Upstart boll weevil speaks
to what the deplorables know
Uh Oh
Gonna start the upheaval
making great the plan
for the American promised
land
Low down, deep state
dossier blues
How they got that FISA
is gonna surprise ya
Unleashing such a torrent
that ill begotten warrant
From the badge
There's no trouble
Inside the deep state DC
bubble
Simple confused contest
for the world to know
The Comey show says so
Lynch didn't flinch
Tarmac meeting was a cinch
The cluster bucks got our
backs
Up the ante
The insurance policy gives
what lacks
Low down, deep state
dossier blues
How they got that FISA
Is gonna surprise ya
Unleashing such a torrent
That ill begotten warrant
In the land of the free
and home of the swamp to
play
Comes this judgment day
Dossier gonna show in ways
you didn't know
Those dominoes are going
to fall
Because, after all, the
swamp's not above the law
If you don't stand, you
will fall
With that misplaced knee
you've passed on liberty
By not choosing, you've
made a choice
If you don't speak, you've
still used your voice
You take that misplaced
knee in the name of liberty for the whole world to see
You tell us about our
county's wrongs and sing victim's songs
While you do little to
confront your enemies from within, for until that is done, that is the greater
sin
Sunday friend once known,
you've lost me and found me besieged
your bitter tree has brown
from the self-seeking seeds you've sewn
You take a knee against
those in blue
We all take a knee against
those who are not true
But take away the good and
you will see who is protecting you
What causes that knee to
bend? is it the urban murders that you can end?
Is it the slaughter of the
unborn, who never knew of a knee to bend?
Is it the endless gang
violence, that that bent knee will silence?
Will that bent knee cure
the soul stealing addictions of self affliction?
Never mind the wars that
came before, disregard the lives lost on those foreign shores loosing sight of
the cost that freedom bore
While taking a knee for a
fallow score
You have a right to make
it right, confront your enemies from within, the remedy for dark is the light
Take a knee to those who
keep you down in your community
Take a knee on the
leadership in the schools who treat you like useful fools
Take a knee to the sins
that keep you from being truly free
Yes, take a righteous knee
against the enemies of liberty
Yes, take a knee against
the despoilers of your liberty, right here, right now, in your own community
Begin to set yourself free
With the election of
Donald Trump as president of the United States and the defeat of Hillary Clinton
for the same office, the cause of liberty was spared a great evil. Now, for the
first time in nearly a generation, the pendulum of government has moved toward
self determination as a people and away from authoritarian statism. It is now
time to stand and deliver. Time is of the essence to clean the Aegean stables of
the Alinsky disciples. The effects of the combination of deliberate degradation
of personal liberty, arrogance and incompetence sold as hope and change can and
will be abrogated by the new administration. Ignore the lies of the losers,
ignore the champions of the failed Alinsky ruling class. The time for proper
leadership of America is now. Stand and deliver.
Time waits for no one.
This is a constant regardless of any political ideology as practiced by
temporary politicians and political office holders. Obviously, no one gets out
of this life alive so it is with sincere scrutiny that the voting American
public should use as keen a sense possible to choose their leaders. The current
president has less time, with each passing day to transform liberty into
tyranny. With that there is relief and resolve to reverse the rampant statism
that befell this country. There should be no nostalgia, no remorse for those that
were gullible enough to fall for the media hype for an inveterate Alinskyite.
Rather, we hope that they were schooled enough in the error of their ways no
never fall for such insanity and vote contrary to such in the future. As we
watch the last state of the union speech by this president mercifully end, the
next election must begin the healing of our frayed land and our clear minded,
rational votes will begin the process of doing so. May God's providence and
workman like wisdom guide us in the ways of self determination while we still
have time. Time waits for no one.
Happy New Year! Take
advantage of your God given abilities despite the outrageous decadence that
passes for merit based success in our morally warped societal norms wherein
selflessness is punished and selfishness is rewarded. Remember that mankind has
been here before and the pendulum is never held against the currently long
awaited revival of rationality. Press on and do not become numb to the current
state of affairs and loose heart. Take the time to equip yourself and whereby
educate your societal circle of influence. Keep in mind, that to give up is
tantamount to joining the oppressors of liberty. One day at a time. Happy New
Year!
Gun free zone = mass
shooting. Liberal policies have deadly consequences. These policies are
politically useful for the politicians who seek greater control over the sheep
that they ostensibly "represent" in political office. Self defense is a God
given right that is codified in the American constitution and is not subject to
the temporal denial of such by tyrants, foreign or domestic. Did the current
president of America rush to the podium and address the American people when
border agent Brian Terry was murdered by drug cartel operatives? Or, with such
fervor when Katie Steinle was murdered by an illegal alien? Or with such urgency
and haste when the Ft. Hood shooter killed unarmed service personnel? Did he
speak with such zealous passion to the American people following the attack on
unarmed military recruiting personnel in Chattanooga, Tennessee? What about his
reaction to the ongoing black on black mass shootings in the inner cities across
America? The answer is no. The reason is obvious. No political advantage = no
answer. The following op-ed piece was written to address the cause and effect of
the Columbine school shooting. It is worth reading again in regard to the
Umpqua, Oregon shooting. Liberal policies have deadly consequences.
American School shootings and values neutral education-
the connection to and conflict with essential liberty
This is one of the most difficult topics on which to write an essay.
The grief and anguish for the slain is very hard to contemplate. It will never
leave those families who were savaged by those attacks. The parents will never
see their children again. On the morning of the shootings, unknowingly, the
parents saw their children for the last time. Can you imagine that empty
feeling? Pray and ask God to comfort them during this time of suffering and
great loss.
Some questions that arise out of these disasters have no answers. We will not
pretend that we have all the answers to this or any other tragedy. Evil exists.
Good exists. Sometimes, evil prevails.
When we analyze these events, some questions we think of are, "What caused
this?, and "What can we do to prevent this from happening again?" These
questions DO have answers. The reason this piece is written is to explore these
answers. The phrase that, "Those who don't learn from history, repeat it" is
quite true. Quotations are included from the founding fathers of American
government in the course of this essay to show that humanity has been here
before. The creators of the American constitution were people who met the
barbarians and realized that they are us, and therefore framed the constitution
and bill of rights around that painful reality in an attempt to check our sad
propensity for self destruction.
In questions of power, then, let no more be said of confidence in man, but bind
him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. --Thomas Jefferson
In our political world today, generally speaking, two types of governments
exist. With varying degrees of application, governments seek to keep societal
order and control. Totalitarian governments control their citizens thoughts,
words and deeds by externally forcing their people to obey the code of law. In
order to bring this about, many personal freedoms don't exist. The government
controls the media and speech of the people to such an extent so as to keep all
activities working for the good of the state. The state sees religious
activities as a threat to it's primacy and atheism is primarily taught.
Individual liberty is a threat to the unified good of the state. Dissent is a
crime and carries a harsh penalty.
No government is respectable which is not just. Without unspotted purity of
public faith, without sacred public principle, fidelity, and honor, no machinery
of laws, can give dignity to political society. --Daniel Webster
In democracies and constitutional republics, such as in America, the primary
method of societal control resides within the people themselves as they exercise
INTERNAL control. This mechanism of order is predicated upon a moral consensus
shared by the society at large. One's respect for their family name or the great
spiritual truths derived from religious traditions informs their inner self as
to what is just and lawful. The guidelines are written on their heart and minds
to the extent that external laws are not generally violated. The external laws
exist to formally detail the law that operates within the internally controlled
individuals. This respect for rule of law is primarily enforced from the inside
out. It might be added that some unjust external laws exist, however, most laws
are enablers of liberty and not it's inhibitor.
John Adams said, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending
with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was
made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the
government of any other. Oct. 11, 1798, Address to the military
"Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best stage,
is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one." --Thomas Paine,
Common Sense; 1776
Being willfully ignorant of that vital element for a free society, deliberately,
over the last thirty years, our government, through the public schools, has
sought to exclude the great religious teachings that have fostered the mechanism
of INTERNAL control. Prayer was eliminated from public schools and evolutionary
teaching took it's place. Students who were once were taught that they were
created in the image of God are now being taught they were nothing more than an
end result of random chance mutations. God is degradingly portrayed as a crutch
and man is the rule maker is now the teaching. Furthermore, the teachings of the
home were ridiculed as being backward and restrictive upon "freedom". The creed
of the schools became "If it feels good-do it". If evolution is true, they
reasoned, why not? This is the ethos of the supposed "values neutral education"
and it threatens to permeate every aspect of our culture.
God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be
thought secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the
minds of men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be
violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect
that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.
--Thomas Jefferson
In time, as these students became young adults, their college professors built
upon these teachings. Then when these college graduates entered the work force
they brought this world view with them into their professions. They now occupy
political office. They are the "credentialed" experts who promulgate the public
school curricula. They are judges and attorneys. Some are school teachers who now
teach these things to subsequent generations; the morally blind now lead the
morally blind.
Thomas Jefferson wrote,
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it
expects what never was and never will be."
What are some of the fruits of all this? Convenience killing for one. Abortion
is called freedom of choice. We see that without God anything is possible.
Without the INTERNALLY applied moral restraint humans are able to rationalize
any behavior. External laws don't avail. The high school shootings are a symptom
of the moral void created by failing to educate the "whole person". External
laws are interpreted as encumbrances to "freedom". These laws are "someone
else's morality". If it "is my body, my choice" in one area of life, why can't
it be the same in other areas of life as well? At least their logic is sound.
Good government generally begins in the family, and if the moral character of a
people once degenerate, their political
character must soon follow. --Elias Boudinot, president of the Continental
Congress
So what happens to our society? Well you can bet the political harlots will
seize upon the visual shock therapy provided by the shootings to make themselves
"relevant" and enact new laws that will diminish the freedom of the law abiding.
Dozens of laws were in place that made what was done in these shootings illegal,
yet they happened anyway. Why are people so mis-guided as to think that more
laws will change this? It will only change when the internal laws are allowed to
function within us as they must. As pointed out earlier, societal control must
happen, it is just a question of how.
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants. -William
Penn
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the
fatigue of supporting it. --Thomas Paine
The present government will play both sides against each other with these type
of tragedies with the end result being more citizens loosing their God given
freedoms as the state passes more and more laws. Freedom and "rights" originate
with nature's God and not with man. Man by his government systems can either
impede or promote "rights". The only way that (exclusively) external laws work
effectively is when personal freedom is lost. The enforcement of this system
requires a police state. We are heading in that direction unless the lawful move
against this process in a systemic manner. The present government is fearful of
our capacity for self protection. They will seek to use these tragedies as a
pretence to emasculate and disarm this country. Do we dare trust them?
No free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest reason for
the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a last resort to
protect themselves against tyranny in government. --Thomas Jefferson
"The basis of our Bill of Rights comes from the teachings we get from Exodus and
St. Matthew, from Isaiah and St. Paul. I don't think we emphasize that enough
these days. If we don't have a proper fundamental moral background, we will
finally end up with a government which does not believe in rights for anybody
except the State!"
Harry S. Truman, Thirty-Third President
The solution to these shooting and other on going tragedies is to return to and
apply the necessary moral teachings that brought this nation about and gave it
animation. The ACLU will cry foul, however, but James Madison wrote,
We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity
of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to
govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the
Ten Commandments of God. --James Madison, chief architect of the Constitution
These fundamentals of our nation's heritage are NOT being taught in the public
schools and this is not by accident. The goal of unregenerate man is to control.
Freedom is a fragile thing and it cannot be domesticated. Values neutral or
values clarification in education is dangerous. The fetish to avoid classifying
behavioral choices as right or wrong is one of the greatest disservices a
government can bring about to it's citizens. The really scary part is the
government KNOWS that our liberty is going to gradually be diminished and this
is part of the formula to bring it about. We the people, I am afraid, have
forgotten the price of freedom. However, we are finding out the cost of having
done so.
I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the
people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and
sudden usurpations. --James Madison
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety.
--Benjamin Franklin
Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and
vicious, they have more need of masters.
--Benjamin Franklin
We have clear choices before us this day. We can continue down the path of least
moral resistance with all it's glossary of obfuscation and grotesque deceit. We
can be emotionally coerced into bowing to the kings contrivance in order to see
ourselves as "open minded" and "tolerant" as we embrace varying forms of
deviancy and normalize this now proven retrograde proscription. We can live in
denial about this for only so long, however. These events will become more
common and will undoubtedly become worse. In many respects, what these school
shootings represent is the beginning of the end of freedom as we have known it.
We can also begin the process of reversing the deterioration we see before us
everyday. The advantages are profound. The solution is simple. We the people,
the ones who know better, despite being characterized as unsophisticated and
elementary, must move to vote away those with these world views. We must remove
from our school boards these destructive teachings and their adherents. These
shootings and other moral enormities are the result of their approach. This is
what they have brought us. The wisdom of the people who began this
constitutional republic and codified the natural rights of man within the
constitution and bill of rights have to be taught to every child. Our heritage
and our humanity will be stolen if we fail to decisively act. This time, without
pretence, we must "do it for the children".
Let us not fall in line with the rest of history, whose fate was described by
Alexander Hamilton when he wrote..."But if experience, in this instance,
verifies the lesson long taught by the enemies of liberty, that the bulk of
mankind are not fit to govern themselves; that they must have a master, and were
only made for the rein and the spur; we shall see the final triumph of despotism
over liberty; the advocates of the latter must acknowledge it to be an ignis
fatuus, and abandon the pursuit. With the greatest advantages for promoting it
that a people ever had, we shall have betrayed the cause of human nature.---A
letter from Hamilton to the citizens of New York containing remarks on Mentor's
reply, 1784
"A mind is a terrible
thing to waste" was the slogan for the United Negro College Fund for decades,
but so are votes a terrible thing to waste when cast for candidates who suppress
the freedom of thought that allows that mind to think for itself. The liberal
black leaders and elected officials count on ignorance, want, prejudice,
self-delusion, dependency on government and the discontent of their constituents
to produce the votes that keep them in office. This yoke of bondage can be
thrown off by a mind that can see through the self-inflicted subjugation that
grievously plagues the American black community. That mind is useful to the
Democratic party and its monopoly of the minorities as long as it isn't "wasted"
by thinking for itself. Independent thoughts make independent people regardless
of race. Independent people don't waste their mind in believing that a self
serving power structure is beneficial to them. A mind will never be wasted
that learns to discern.
Sometimes the thought of
greater personal accountability brings with it the promise of New Years
resolutions for improvement on an individual level. Similarly, the start of a
new Congress and Senate bring with it greater political accountability for the
goal of improving the legislative process to better reflect and represent the
will of the electorate. Certainly that is the basics of it, but we shall see
just how true the newly elected are to their voters and how long these
resolutions last and just how susceptible the new legislators are to Potomac
fever.
The lower house, the
congress, is the most accountable to the voter, that is why that they have two
year terms, thereby facing the voter more regularly and also all legislation for
revenue starts with the House of Representatives. This last election was a wave
election of numerically historic proportions. However, they are no less
accountable to the people who elected them. With each new election, and the
problems facing America, the accountability for those voted into office will
only grow in intensity. Time is running out to correct the problems facing
America, indeed some say that they are past solving, time will tell. Yet,
greater honesty in government as well as keeping true to one's New Years
resolutions will require greater scrutiny and free inquiry. John Adams spoke of
the battles that ensue when truth is sought out in matters of faith, but the
same holds true for personal political accountability...And ever since the
Reformation, when or where has existed a Protestant or dissenting sect who would
tolerate A FREE INQUIRY?
The blackest
billingsgate, the most ungentlemanly insolence, the most yahooish brutality, is
patiently endured, countenanced, propagated, and applauded. But touch a solemn
truth in collision with a dogma of a sect, though capable of the clearest proof,
and you will soon find you have disturbed a nest, and the hornets will swarm
about your eyes and hand, and fly into your face and eyes.
New Year or not, we can
see that mankind never changes all that much. Reject the Alinskites and
work for greater accountability in office
or work to remove the resolution breakers from office. The elections of 2016
will be here before we know it.
What is important to
remember about the accelerating chaos and genocide going on in the Middle East
is that all of the perceived failures in U.S. foreign policy are but collateral
damage from the larger mission of the current presidential administration, the
state department and the United Nations as they progress in the process of
undoing and removing as much of American influence and policy that has
been developed over the last fifty years.
The hatred and prejudice
against Israel and the United States from those in power as mentioned above,
stems from the rejection of American exeptionalism and the embracing of
anti-Semitism. Former secretary of state Clinton (she loves to kiss her an
Arafat) didn't make a mistake in Benghazi because she fundamentally was helping
to "transform" America by weakening and debilitating American influence and
power in the area. President Oblabla was not a failure by holding back from
airstrikes that would have devastated the ISIL convoys that where
vulnerable while driving through open countryside. Instead, his goal was to
allow the last administration look bad by going into Iraq to begin with. Yet, he
is the one who looks delinquent and ill equipped as the slaughter unfolds. He
doesn't care about the deaths or the blood on his hands just as long as the
previous administrations look bad. It has to be somewhat bittersweet for Oblabla
because is such a grotesquely egotistical narcissist and has a fetish for
approval, to be criticized for a en fuego Middle East while enjoying the fruits
of his hatred for America and his latent anti-Semitism. Just some fundamental
transformation going on.
When was the last time
that this country was so imperiled on every facet of her existence as she is
today?
Consider this. America's
borders to the south are being systematically erased. The country of Mexico is
providing a clear path for illegal immigrants from central American countries to
make their way into southwestern states. So many are arriving that the border
patrol and I.C.E. are not presently capable to keep this from happening. This
will change the demographics of America in short order and not for the better.
This influx has also provided cover for criminals who know that they have a
great opportunity to slip into this country unnoticed. They are gang members and
terrorists.
America's economy is
threatened. American workers are being subjected to declining wages. America's
healthcare is threatened. America's debt is growing to bankrupting proportions.
The state department and the executive branch makes poor provisions for a coherent middle east policy and that
conversely threatens us
domestically. Allies are shunned and enemies embraced or treated with dangerous
ambivalence. College graduates have debt laden futures before they even get
started with their careers. Simple morality is attacked as "intolerant" by the
morally bankrupt.
So in six years America is
worse off today and is undergoing the much hyped "fundamental transformation".
Foreign policy from effective to ineffective, border control from bad to
disastrous, economy from mediocre to abysmal, consumer purchasing power from ok to
weak, workers rights from tolerable to hollowed out, from privacy rights to meta
data collection, cameras and drones, the justice department being all about
selective, statutorily capricious quasi-injustice, health care from costly to
completely unaffordable, war on terror from in control to out of control, etc,
etc.
From her founding and
development to today America has always been threatened but those threats have
mainly come externally. The answer to the question of when was the last time
that this country was so imperiled on every facet of her existence as she is
today? Never, this is a fundamentally transformed threat of an internal and
institutional nature. All these problems are produced by a deliberate plan to
transform America from strength to weakness, therefore, because of this America
has never been so imperiled.
Resident in the American
political process is the ethos of most career and establishment politicians of
how to fool most of the people most of the time. Sadly, because most of the
electorate lack the initiative to inform themselves objectively and
sufficiently, they, by default, are fooled and cast the fools vote. It is said
that you can "fool some of the people some of the time but you can't fool all of
the people all the time". The 2014 mid-term elections will see if this aphorism
holds true.
If we further break down
how that enough of the people are fooled most of the time, we need to look at
two of the basic formulae. Inquiring minds want to know! First and foremost is
how our elected officials are viewed by those who vote for them. The trust
factor is key here even though most polls reveal that politicians can not be
trusted, yet the incumbency rate is and has been quite high for a long time.
Look it up for yourself-it is ghastly. Again, what was written earlier, an
uninformed electorate is the key ingredient that facilitates this. The first
formula is for politicians to have politically useful problems. We will use the
metaphorical acronym PUPS, politically useful problems.
What is meant by this? Politicians need problems to fix to be relevant and
campaign upon. Most of these problems are created by the politicians themselves,
disguised as such and presented to the voter as fixable only by the politicians
that are, let's guess, "fighting for you". An informed electorate would see
through the chicanery and obfuscation. Problems such as a porous border,
pathetic energy policy, health care costs from a broken system, job robbing
imports, etc are but examples of problems that they caused that they use for
reelection campaigns. Can these be "fixed"? Of course. Will they? Not if the
same people are reelected in a sufficient majority. If the politicians actually
fixed these problems the average American would have more prosperous and dare we
say it INDEPENDENT lives. Fixing these problems would also take away the
campaign issues that these leeches need to keep themselves in office, so don't
look for much in the way of "fixing" because the "fix" is in.
There is also the
political formula that is as old as dirt and that is the three V's of
dependency. VICTIM, VICTIMIZER, VINDICATOR.
VICTIM-one who either,
real or imagined sees themselves as having been "done wrong" by the victimizer.
VICTIMIZER-one who either,
real or imagined is portrayed as victimizing the victim.
VINDICATOR-one who either,
real or imagined is there, in this equation, to right the wrongs and "save the
day" for the victim.
An example of such is the
top 1% of wealth holders in America-VICTIMIZER.
They are "victimizing" the
rest of us, especially the middle and lower income earners. They are the VICTIM.
VINDICATOR in all of this
is the class envy is the politician who created the mess with their policies.
Remember that that they are fighting for you!
What they are fighting for
is to keep the electorate blind to all of this so that they can gain and retain
their cushy "public servant" jobs and enrich themselves in the process.
Just plug in race, gender,
rights for this class of people or that and the same candidates will keep on
winning and keep on ruling over the serfs . This is masterful strategy of
unending success over the subjects who vote for their own bondage. When they say
that they are fighting for you they don't finish the sentence because if they
did they would conclude the sentence with "fighting for you to stay where that
you are-subservient, useful and dependant". Fool most of the people most of the
time? Not if we vote to stay free! Don't allow yourself to be defined by these
robber barons. Vote away the plexus of political utility that they would have us
ALL live under.
Regardless of one's
religious perspective or persuasion or cosmological rationale, the focus of the
resurrection, the passion of Christ, is a reminder for all people who dwell on the earth
that our time here is finite and that we are to be wise stewards with that which we have
been given. As scripture says, "for the living know that they will die".
Whether one trusts in the
resurrection of Christ for their redemption or not, the example that he set
should cause all of us to question our motives and decisions that we make in
this world. He put others first over his comfort and pleasure, he helped the
helpless. He fought the corruption of the self serving political and religious
leaders of his day. He was a meek servant of man and a bold reprover of the
decadent ruling classes. All should follow his example in this regard.
Faith in Christ is not a
vanity. Faith in Christ is faith in an exemplary and sacrificial life that comports with the
human condition and the ultimate human need-redemption of the soul. Faith in Christ is faith
in the love and sacrificial death of one who was willing to loose his life so others could gain
theirs. Wherever the faith of Christ is accurately and appropriately practiced
in our world, the state of man is improved. This world that we live in is in
need of much selfless love and redemption. His words say it the best as he
readied himself for his physical and mental suffering and anguish, death burial
and resurrection...
John Chapter 17
Jesus
spoke these words, lifted up His
eyes to heaven, and said:
“Father, the
hour has come. Glorify Your Son,
that Your Son also may glorify
You,2 as
You have given Him authority
over all flesh, that He should
give eternal life to as many as
You have given Him.3 And
this is eternal life, that they
may know You, the only true God,
and Jesus Christ whom You have
sent.4 I
have glorified You on the earth.
I have finished the work which
You have given Me to do.5 And
now, O Father, glorify Me
together with Yourself, with the
glory which I had with You
before the world was.
6 “I
have manifested Your name to the
men whom You have given Me out
of the world. They were Yours,
You gave them to Me, and they
have kept Your word.7 Now
they have known that all things
which You have given Me are from
You.8 For
I have given to them the words
which You have given Me; and
they have received them,
and have known surely that I
came forth from You; and they
have believed that You sent Me.
9 “I
pray for them. I do not pray for
the world but for those whom You
have given Me, for they are
Yours.10 And
all Mine are Yours, and Yours
are Mine, and I am glorified in
them.11 Now
I am no longer in the world, but
these are in the world, and I
come to You. Holy Father, keep
through Your name those whom You
have given Me that they may be
one as We are.12 While
I was with them in the worldI kept them in
Your name. Those whom You gave
Me I have kept and none of them
is lost except the son of
perdition, that the Scripture
might be fulfilled.13 But
now I come to You, and these
things I speak in the world,
that they may have My joy
fulfilled in themselves.14 I
have given them Your word; and
the world has hated them because
they are not of the world, just
as I am not of the world.15 I
do not pray that You should take
them out of the world, but that
You should keep them from the
evil one.16 They
are not of the world, just as I
am not of the world.17 Sanctify
them by Your truth. Your word is
truth.18 As
You sent Me into the world, I
also have sent them into the
world.19 And
for their sakes I sanctify
Myself, that they also may be
sanctified by the truth.
20 “I
do not pray for these alone, but
also for those who will believe
in Me through their word;21 that
they all may be one, as You,
Father, are in Me, and I
in You; that they also may be
one in Us, that the world may
believe that You sent Me.22 And
the glory which You gave Me I
have given them, that they may
be one just as We are one:23 I
in them, and You in Me; that
they may be made perfect in one,
and that the world may know that
You have sent Me, and have loved
them as You have loved Me.
24 “Father,
I desire that they also whom You
gave Me may be with Me where I
am, that they may behold My
glory which You have given Me;
for You loved Me before the
foundation of the world.25 O
righteous Father! The world has
not known You, but I have known
You; and these have known that
You sent Me.26 And
I have declared to them Your
name, and will declare it,
that the love with which You
loved Me may be in them, and I
in them.”
April fools day! Some
basics from the deck of the good ship Barry O. First rule is that perception is
reality AND reality is negotiable. Liars figure and figures lie...if $10.00 per
month for contraception constitutes a "war on women" then what does having ones
health insurance cancelled or facing several hundred percent increases in
insurance premiums as a result of the ACA, aka, Obamacare constitute? If the
"most transparent" administration in history keeps sliding the cups around with
the shell game of delaying the "affordable" individual mandate" until after the
2014 mid-term elections then what would define "opaque"? To quote a recent
president, that sounds like "fuzzy math".
By the way, did the first
lady and the first and second children return from China? Her and her sacrifices
of the piece of the pie she once alluded to-sounds like the rest of us are just
to eat cake.
Is Harry "whole cloth"
Reid senile? Depends.
In the same way that the
work force participation rate isn't factored into determining the U.S.
unemployment rate and thereby the rate is fraudulently low by omission, so all
of us can instantly become fifty percent younger by making the year eighteen
months instead of twelve. Just like the amazing seven million "signed up" for
Obamacare, the fraud here is how many lost their coverage. April fools to all
you useful idiots that voted for your own bondage!
The Russian take over of
the Ukraine is but an appetizer. The American president, Barak Obama once again
has proved to the world to be ill-equipped strategically and ill-equipped
morally to provide an effective counter measure to the pending Russian
expansionism. The Russian president Vladimir Putin has nothing to fear and he
knows it. This is what America will discover-that the bully Obama is being out
bullied by Putin. China is cheering Putin on and John Kerry and the state
department don't have the world view that provides for peace through strength.
Just give a speech, blame George W. Bush and print more money, Obama . Maybe the
solution is to get the Russian people hooked on EBT cards. Stay tuned, Russia
will be ready to order the entre soon and it won't be from an EBT.
The solution to repealing
Obamacare and restoring individual prosperity for the common man is to free the
Capitol of America, Washington, DC from the statists and thereby free the
working investment capital of entrepreneurs to restore our prosperity.
Repeal and restore. Statists NO MORE!
The communists have a
phrase that they use to point out the supposed flaw in capitalism, "the
capitalist will sell us the rope with which we will hang them". Seems that the
establishment Republicans have forgotten about this, seems that they are being
bought off by the United States Chamber of Commerce and the "need" for
immigration "reform". The need they say, is not being met by
domestically produced college graduates. They say as subterfuge to cover up what
they really want and what they want is cheap labor.
Obviously, there are not
enough jobs to go around right now and a massive influx of low skilled,
uneducated and English challenged Latin Americans is the last thing this country
needs. With this demographic is a huge reliance on social welfare programs and
medical care. The voting habits of this group is overwhelmingly for the
Democratic party. This group is against limited government, gun rights and low
taxes. Ironically they come from countries that have these policies in place and
suffer under them only to come to this country and want to continue with these
policies here.
Republicans would be
voting themselves out of existence if they vote for "reform" and "amnesty". The
same way that California has gone is the way the ENTIRE country would go. Don't
sell us out and don't sell that rope. We are watching. The only reason that the
House of Representatives is run by the Republicans is because the TEA party got
the vote out and put them in power and now these fools are talking about a "year
of action" with the president?
Hillary Clinton said
"dissent is the highest form of patriotism". She also told us during on a CBS Sixty
Minutes co-interview with our current president that they held very similar views
and policy approaches to domestic and foreign issues. That is as it should be
since the Alinskyite in chief used his methodology to gain and grow his
political career and Hillary, as a Wellesley undergraduate, wrote her ninety two
page senior thesis on Alinsky's teachings and entitled it "There is only the
fight: An analysis of the Alinsky Model." She is hard wired to this corrupt
political philosophy and views America as an unjust country.
From Billy Dale to Vince
Foster to the "vast right wing conspiracy", etc, etc with the commonality of
Alinsky with Barak Obama, if she becomes president it will make what is
happening to her claim of dissent being the highest form of patriotism even more
of a cruel farce and self serving subterfuge.
The allegiance to the all
powerful state is the highest form of patriotism to this president (Obama) and
the president to be (Hillary Clinton). From their perspective, those that show
dissent to this confiscation of individual liberty and pillage of
constitutional rights are worthy of prosecution to the fullest extent of their
ad hoc laws. With these statist in power, Dinesh D'Souza is a political prisoner
and the progressives are the real book burners. Like the song says "...step out
of line and the man come and take you away...". The left of today is "the man" and
they are the establishment. Irony, myopic irony.
Part of the written
mission statement of the NAACP is to "ensure the political, social, and economic
equality of all citizens". Think it over. Political equality. Social equality.
Economic equality. The word equality as used here means in a racial context, without
preference or partiality. Equality of opportunity-not result. These are their
goals, worthy goals for sure.
So when Tim Scott, the
first black United States senator from the south since reconstruction, is
derogatorily described as a "ventriloquist's dummy" by the Rev. William Barber
II, the president of North Carolina's NAACP chapter, one has to wonder just how
serious Mr. Barber is in honoring that mission statement. It makes for an ugly
testimony to those who share the mission statement of the NAACP. It is a
testimony that casts doubt on whether the mission statement is nothing more than
empty words. Tim Scott is a prime example of the aforementioned NAACP goals
being realized. Tim Scott is a black man who is now one of the one hundred U.S.
senators. If the NAACP were true to their calling he would be celebrated.
However, since they don't celebrate Sen. Scott they show that they have a
different agenda than their mission statement.
As a Reverend, Mr. Barber
must know that Jesus said in Matthew 12:36, "But I say unto you, that every idle
word that men shall speak, they shall give account of in the day of judgment".
The words of the NAACP North Carolina president DON'T respect Senator Scott when
it comes to ensuring the political, social and economic equality of all
citizens.
The president of the NAACP
North Carolina chapter also besmirched the character and motive of Senator Scott
with the following words, “The extreme right wing comes down here,” he said,
“finds a black guy to be senator and claims he’s the first black senator since
Reconstruction and then he goes to Washington, D.C., and articulates the agenda
of the Tea Party.”
Let us evaluate those
statements and draw conclusions for as a Reverend Barber II must also be
knowledgeable about the admonition found in the New Testament in James 3:1, "Let
not many of you become teachers, my brethren, knowing that as such we will incur
a stricter judgment". Well, what is his doctrine?
"Extreme right wing" is a
Pavlovian phrase that elicits a conditioned response from the ill reasoned and
misinformed population. "Tea party agenda" is another phrase that has been given
an arranged psychological response in those people who are willfully ignorant of
the actual purpose of the Tea party. The liberal media and government schools
frame this issue.
It has not always been
this way, yet the current NAACP has
sought to retain power and relevance by abetting and perpetuating the victimhood
mind set of dependency upon government programs within the black demographic.
Once dependent upon and thoroughly victimized by the massive governmental
bureaucracy, the need for generational public assistance becomes necessary for their
daily subsistence. Not much political, social, and economic equality of all
citizens going on by this method.
The unemployment rate for
black males is very high and has increased during the last five years and the
pursuit of the "political, social, and economic equality of all citizens" is
endangered and not enhanced by the economic policies that the NAACP advocates.
The Tea Party champions pro growth economic policies that would create jobs, put
people to work and improve the quality of their lives. The Tea party says
that it wants to improve the political, social and economic conditions in
peoples lives and matches it with DEEDS. It is obvious that he Rev. William Barber II is a "
ventriloquist's dummy" for the statists. He is by default an useful idiot.
Tim Scott, conversely speaks his OWN mind.
Senator
Tim Scott has shown the better way to achieve the goals of the NAACP than their
current hypocritical overlords. Economic equality is found by rejecting
the crony capitalist and Solyndraesque money laundering methodologies. Equality
is found when free people are free! History demonstrates that freedom of the
individual is found when the state is synchronized to individual rights and not
the other way around. Economic equality is equal economic opportunity and it is
NOT economic result regardless of skin pigmentation.
True
advancement of the goals of the NAACP are not realized with dependency upon the
state and the mindset that supports such. True advancement of the goals of the
NAACP are realized with a non-statist government that looks these problems square in the eye
and properly relinquishes such a collusionary and controlled operation over a free
people. The overlords of today are, through their self serving policies,
perpetuating the "back of the bus" mentality that keep blacks useful for the
statist. When the self serving nature of the state is held in check and the
rights of the individual are preeminent then we can say, "free at last, free at
last, thank God Almighty, free at last!
The United States
constitution is not an instrument to constrain the American people, it is
designed to constrain the government. When it is slighted or ignored its purpose
is shown to be even more just and necessary. The evasions, mischief and methods
of circumventing the restraints of the constitution are plenty and robust in
this current administration. The delegation of and limits to the federal
government of governmental power are completely necessary if Americans are to remain free.
The goals and objectives
of this administration consistently conflict with our constitutional rights and
protections. This constitutionally antagonistic administration has threatened
and seeks to restrict our private property rights, religious freedoms, health
care choices and all aspects of the private business sector. Ironically, it is
doing this while granting itself the power that it constitution doesn't
authorize. This administration has become a law unto itself. Sadly, the useful
idiots who voted for this don't have a problem with it.
In this new year resolve
to enable freedom under law and resist and reject those who are loyal to
totalitarianism. The only office holder that is of benefit to liberty is one who
knows that political power MUST be divided and muted. Resolve for liberty
America!
The late Daniel Patrick
Moynihan once wrote an opinion paper concerning the moral and ethical decline in
contemporary American society. The work was entitled "Defining Deviancy Down:
How We've Become Accustomed To Alarming Levels Of Crime And Destructive
Behavior.
http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ478731
Moynihan was a liberal and
voted this way most of the time. However, he could be found voting his own way,
his own ethos and his own conscience as opposed to the Democratic party line.
This opinion paper is a contradiction unto itself, yet it makes the point that
without defining what is beneficial to a free society and conversely, what is
not, that society will ultimately reach it's lowest common moral denominator and
will systemically sink lower and lower until anarchy is reached.
Similarly, when president
Obama attended the memorial service for the late and former president of South
Africa, Nelson Mandela he was in the company of international terrorist,
dictators and thugs of all strip and degree. Previously under such
circumstances, former American presidents would not have attended knowing that
one would be judged as sanctioning their criminal behavior, Decorum? What
decorum? Obama was so eager to politicize this event and draw energy from it
that is no wonder such didn't matter to him.
Well America this
"historic" president just keeps getting more historic all the time. If Moynihan
could write a piece about Obama as he visited the Mandela memorial he could
entitle it: "Defining Diplomacy Down: How We've Become Accustomed To Alarming
Levels Of Crime And Destructive Behavior.
It is quite remarkable
that in this generation, which has access to technology that greatly enhances
the collection, distribution and retrieval of information, increasing numbers of
Americans are illiterate concerning events that precipitated the creation of our
country. They are willfully ignorant.
Basic knowledge regarding the historical context and foundations of America are
lacking for the most part, to our detriment, in contemporary society. How can a
free people remain free when they are ignorant of that which they were
liberated? And what about the cost that liberty exacted? This aspect of our
heritage, the price of freedom and the cost of tyranny, must be retained
transgenerationally to maintain our status as a free people. When the roots are
severed the branches will slowly, yet inevitably die.
The main elements of that struggle will never change. Specifically, the
congenital clash between those who seek personal freedom and those plotting
tyranny. Only the venues and the particulars of it's expression change. The
Trojan horse of history is today's creeping socialist utopia. Fascists, as we
should know, take control of the means of production. Doesn't this remind us of
the aims of the EPA and Obamacare?
Medieval feudalism isn't dead. It is
reincarnated in broad generalized grants of unaccountable authority given,
without our voice, to governmental agencies. Today's progressive and
confiscatory taxation calls for a correlative emancipation proclamation. Through
political superficiality this country is unwittingly voting itself into bondage.
Have you ever considered the need for both parents to work to make ends meet?
That is if the EBT well doesn't brings them water. The American taxpayers union
informs us that the average taxpayer begins, as far as their tax obligation is
concerned, to work (keeping gross pay) for themselves well into May. Preceding
this date ALL monies earned flow to the outstretched hand of the government.
This situation grows worse every year. As the state is made stronger the
individual is correspondingly weakened.
Contemporary America is
dropping the cultural baton. Why must this happen?
Pure political devotion to
the Democratic party and the power to rule over as opposed to governing the
American people, gives spirit and animation to the hoax and illusion that is
Obamacare. The personal choices once pertaining to health care and health
insurance by for and of the individual are becoming obsolete as the coercive
demands by for and of the state take precedence.
The scope of this fraud by
omission (keeping your doctor if you like your doctor) perpetrated on the
American economy starts at one-sixth of GDP. This percentage will exponentially
grow since it will be subject to the waste, fraud and abuse that comes so
naturally with the administrative bureaucratic machinery of most federal
government programs. In time, the magnitude of these associated costs will
necessitate higher taxes to pay for the ACA.
The medical care provided
will be substandard since the cost and complexities of the law are causing many
doctors to get out of the profession. For example, the law created the
Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). This board works to reduce Medicare
payments. Because of this, this law will lower the quality and availability of
health care for millions of people. The metastasizing costs of this law and
drain on the economy will create "unexpected" revenue short falls since the cost
of coverage and care will consume and take away more and more money from other
taxable transactions.
The Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (very funny title if not so very tragic) also will obviously
pervert and corrupt the once great "Doctor-patient relationship". Remember that
quaint basis that is the reason for all of this to begin with? Also remember
this, part of the Hippocratic oath of affirmation pledged by physicians is that
they will "keep their patients from "harm and injustice".
The mid-term
elections of 2014 draw closer and closer and with that
is the chance to euthanize the ACA when the voters will
vote to keep America from the “harm and injustice” of
the “Affordable Care Act”.
He built that. This
president, you know, the one that won the last two presidential elections, the
one that lives in 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20500. Specifically,
the president that ran on providing "affordable health care for all Americans"
is who we are referring to. What did he build? He built Obamacare. You know the
president who seemingly has no connection to the debacle that is going on with
the registration process for this "accessible and affordable" health care. He built
that. It has his name on it, he signed it into law on March, 23, 2010 he owns
it, he built that.
Conversely, this same
president, who got it so wrong when he took off his smiley face and whistling
sssssses of his phony "folksy" persona on July, 13, 2012 during a campaign
appearance in Roanoke, Virginia and told his audience, "If you've got a
business-you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
Guess what-they built
that. "They" deferred personal gratification, sacrificed their time, money,
sleep, blood, sweat and tears to build that. The covetousness of this president
over successful business owners and antipathy toward them has blinded his
perception of personal accountability. In the real world outside of DC politics
it is deeds not words that carry the day and matter most. The "they" that built
that-are watching a much vaunted "presidential legacy" legislation implode, know
when things work and when they don't. That ability is how "they successfully
built that". This president, who is looking more discredited by the day has
different skill sets than they. His skills are not a builder of success but a
destroyer. Obamacare will destroy our functional health care and make us all
wards of the state. He built that.
The left is fighting an up-hill,
against the grain, swimming upstream
battle to lie, cheat and steal their way
to successfully teach/brainwash people
into believing that their
"natural" liberty inclinations are wrong
and that only government has the
answers.
Conservatism
comes naturally, conversely, liberalism
requires operant conditioning of thought
and ongoing negative reinforcement to
enslave an erstwhile free people. That
is one reason the left fights so very
hard to retain control of the public
school system.
Horror vacui. This is a
Latin phrase commonly rendered in English as "Nature abhors a vacuum". Aristotle
observed that voids are usually filled in nature. He saw that in the natural
order of things, the earthly physical world operates as such. In the realm of
politics, the same holds true. Sometimes, still, political voids are hidden and
disguised to the voter because not all vacuums are created equal.
The current
president has been the beneficiary of several media created voids. One example
is that we are told that America was too
big for its britches and needed to be knocked down a few notches. Another
example is that the cost of health care would be reduced and availability would
expand with a top down, authoritarian and centralized national health care
system. These vacuums were created to be filled with spin and propaganda of the
left that most of the American voter believed as truth. If anyone opposed these
lies, they were ridiculed as right wing fanatics. The stage was set and in October of
2008, candidate Barrack Obama said, "we are five days away from fundamentally
transforming the United States of America".
For greater clarification, let us
take a look at the dictionary. Merriam-Webster defines fundamentally as,
"forming or relating to the most important part of something, of or relating to
the basic structure or function of something". Merriam-Webster also defines
transforming as "to change in composition or structure", "to change in outward
form or appearance of", "to change in character or condition".
The entire Obama
administration has held true to this promise. America has been transformed. The
people answer to the federal government in "transformational" ways and the
federal government is unaccountable to the people in "fundamental" ways. How is
that "hope and change" working for you, you useful idiots?
With the looming
implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, many life boat
scenarios are emerging to forestall the deliberate ruin of private health
insurance. We read about various groups and organisations looking for ways to
exempt themselves from the economic devastation this bill will cause. Groups such
as the fast food industry, labor unions, small business associations and
ironically enough, the legislative branch of the federal government, all want
protection from this unjust law.
Conversely, this law is
wonderful if the goal is to divide and conquer a free country, subjugate the
people and turn the citizens into subjects. Look at it, group will contend with
group to stay financially afloat and avoid as much of this law as
possible. Sadly, physicians are bailing out of practice and that means fewer
doctors to serve more people and that in turn means rationed care. Like the life
boat scenario, who shall live and who shall die? And who or whom will make these
decisions?
Obviously Orwellian in
name, this law doesn't protect the patient and it makes health care significantly
more expensive. We see our country being made chaotic and needlessly divided by
this law. This law has been unconstitutionally modified expo-facto by the
executive branch without regard to the legislative process as exemptions and
extensions of one sort of another are granted by the President. This law was
never about health care it was all about the life boat and the ship is about to
leave the dock.
The amount and type of
personal information required by the government for the (PPACA) is onerous and
designed to intimidate and control the people of this country. Liberals once
loudly protested for the government to stay out of their wombs, but they are
very quiet when this law will put the government into every nook and cranny of
their bodies and digitize their health information for easy dissemination.
The cost and financial
drain on the American economy caused by this legislation will dry up disposable
income and the discretionary spending necessary for economic growth and
stability. What we have as a result of this law, is loss of liberty, loss of
privacy, loss of choice for medical treatment, loss of income and loss of life
from the law called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Come on
aboard, your life boat is waiting.
Situations reveal
character. The current legislative impasse, aka, the government shut down is
doing that very well. Today, we found out that the Senate majority leader,
Senator Harry Reid is against helping kids with cancer. He doesn't want to help
them, even if he could save one child. The following are his words in response
to a question from a reporter from CNN, Dana Bash. "If you can help one child,
why won't you do it?". The fine upstanding, compassionate, caring, "working for
the little guy", paragon of virtue and morality, sage-like and endued with
wisdom from on high, Reid responded "Why, why, why would we want do that?" "I
have 1100 people at Nellis Air Force Base who are sitting at home, because of
government employee furloughs. They have, they have a few problems of their own.
This is, to have someone of your intelligence suggest a thing means you're as
irresponsible and reckless."
Now, now, Harry, you have to watch that war on
women with such a rebuke to Ms. Bash. So the "honorable" Senator Reid weighs
helping children with cancer against using the political leverage and bargaining
chip of defunding parts of the military and decides that it would be
irresponsible and reckless to even help "one child". It would be a reasonable
bet that Harry takes care of his own when it comes to "saving one child".
It must be noted that the
Republicans in the House of Representatives sent a bill authorising the
continued funding for clinical pediatric cancer trials at the National
Institutes of Health to the Senate. In Mr. Reid's politically calculating mind
he reasons that it would be irresponsible and reckless to sign it-it just
doesn't advance his agenda. Harry has a moral consistency like pond scum.
Several years back, he went looking for an apology from Rush Limbaugh amidst the
distortion of events surrounding the "phony soldiers" episode. You see, Senator
Reid has always had a place of honor and deep, deep respect for our soldiers
(tee hee) because they are so politically useful. He has no concern for them per
se. His concern for them goes only as far as his opportunity to use them for
political ends. Hopefully, even the useful idiots who think that the only place
in the government one can find compassion is with the Democratic party can see
Senator Reid for the cold hearted and bitter man he is. Situations reveal
character.
It has been the ardent
desire of the progressives in the United States government to remove as much personal liberty from the sheeple
of this country as possible by any means necessary. The process has been slow and methodical
and has involved every aspect of the American economy. It has finally come near
to fruition with the pending implementation of The Affordable Care Act (ACA)
(aka) Obamacare. This legislation was voted into law under the pretense of
easing the difficulty for the uninsured to obtain health insurance, and as one
can see, such has not happened nor shall happen. It has been a fraudulent effort
from conception to implementation. With special waivers and conditions for one
group of Americans and no such consideration for other groups, this law is very
corrupt, unconstitutional and without ethical foundation to say the least. It must be resisted by
all who would become, under this bureaucratic nightmare, subjects who were once
citizens.
Regardless of consequence,
some Senators made clear with speeches from the Senate floor as to just how
destructive that this law is; thanks and gratitude must be given for the
courageous efforts of Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Rand Paul and Marco Rubio to
resist the law and its implementation. The House of Representatives has also
made the case to defund/repeal/replace this corrupt law and they need
encouragement to stay the course in this regard. The bottom line is that our
liberty will go away when the government decides who gets what treatment and
care and who does not and those decision makers will be doing so while being
paid with your tax
money. The mandate to buy health insurance is extortion and will destroy this
country. It extorts because one must, as in the mafia, "pay up so nobody gets
hurt".
Taxes are incidental to a persons life-being forced to buy health
insurance as a condition of lawful residence in this country is not. This
amounts to protection money just as it is in organized crime. This law is also
blatantly hypocritical and arrogant since exceptions were given to congressional
staff. These staffers helped write the law and then got around compliance to it because it is so
"affordable".
This is against the background noise of Senate Majority leader
Harry Reid informing us that the Tea Party are "anarchists". Reid is practicing
anarchy by avoiding the law he wants the rest of us to obey. Oh, and by the way,
the original design of the law was to provide insurance for the uninsured, well
MORE people will be without insurance as this law goes into effect and the cost
of care will rise even faster. The old adage that there is not a dimes
difference between the Democrats and Republicans clearly isn't true and this is
really obvious to all but the most useful of the useful idiots in America.
To those of an open mind and candid heart, when
the people shopping in the Westgate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya were attacked, the
liberty of the Western way of life was by proxy also attacked. What we saw there were the
thoughts of Mohammadites turned into action. We saw once again their intentions
to violently resist liberty and impose a seventh century set of laws on the
world. This is what
they want. This is what they think of us and our way of life.
This is what they intend to do to ALL
OF US. Freedom was attacked on that day as well as all who embrace it. Therefore, in the
name of freedom and in the name of an honest, virtuous and true world view, we must
eradicate all those who put
their perniciously tyrannical ways above our own before it is too late. We don't
require allied approbation since all of us were attacked as if we were also in
that mall. Such pathetically ill "reasoned" anger from these porcineaphobics
will eventually come to EVERY country and person who will not submit to their
tyrannical theocracy.
In America these useful
idiots are being taught to hate America and her way of liberty. They are easily
recruited and led by their hate into fighting the "great Satan", America.
America, you see has a degree of religious liberty and allows for the practice
of many different faiths, a circumstance that these hate mongers can't tolerate.
At the preeminent terroristic loci of our time is ignorance, hate and fear
within the mind of these destroyers of life and there are no geographical
boundaries for its expression. They are such cowards when they murder unarmed
shoppers at a mall, bomb the Boston marathon or bomb churchgoers at a Pakistani
church, etc. We must excise this plague on
humanity.
In the same way that the
Democrats fled and abandoned their fellow Americans during the attack on the
American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, the majority of Democrats left
the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing room during the
testimony of the mother of one of the victims and the father of one of the
victims. These people serving on the House Oversight Committee have cowardice of
the soul and spirit and should be removed from office. They must be called on
this and defeated the next election. It is amazing that they even consider
themselves worthy of election. May God have mercy on their souls.
The Naval yard shooter was a wicked man. The politicians who seek political gain at the expense of any
shameful exploitation of this tragedy are of the same ilk as this evil shooter.
They just kill with legislation that makes it easy for mass murderers to kill; they are de facto murderers. Instead
of enabling personal safety by allowing the people to arm themselves vis-à-vis concealed carry permits
most of these victims were unarmed. When the
general population is unarmed and defenseless, these tragedies will continue to
happen and the the soulless, amoral "political leaders" know this and will use
these tragedies to tear down the second amendment. If maniacal people such as this
murderous man where aware that others would be firing back at them then there would
be a self policing element to keep the peace. The actions of one individual
are not to be the basis for removing our Constitutional right of self
protection. This man had a multitude of red flag warnings and was not in touch
with reality. This could have been prevented if he had been given the
psychiatric care that he obviously needed.
What good is all of the NSA snooping
if they can't act on the basics within the frame work of intelligence gathering
and take the necessary steps to keep this person out of the public at large for
the safety of us all? This "data gathering" is misguided at best and sardonic at
worst if we loose our privacy and right to self defense in one fell swoop. After
all, who is watching the watchman?
Vladimir Putin has written
an op-ed to the American people and it was published in The New York
Times. Mr. Putin expressed the sentiments of a master propagandist in a
provocative voice of self serving punk logic. He appeals to reason when it suits
Russia's interests; predictably and naturally presenting himself as a
magnanimous source of moderation and an abater of military action, while he omits
the military actions that he has taken and extols the virtues of the United
Nations. He has seen the ineptitude and rank amateur foreign policies of the
current administration and is cunning and confident enough to exploit them. In
his letter he cites the recent failures of American foreign policy and regales
in it. The American people, by voting for Obama for a second term, have
demonstrated to the world that we are a dangerously divided people that both
lack discernment and a clear sense of national identity. Putin said in his
letter that "It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see
themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation."
He defines his fears, that an America with an accurate understanding of and a
strong belief in her exceptional nature and form of government would present a
powerful force of courageous good in a world of moral chaos and near anarchy.
His letter should be included with the likes of Tokyo Rose, Lord Haw Haw, et al.
Remember and mourn the
dead from September 11, 2001 who died because of the actions of madmen with a
jihadist world view. These jihadist flew hijacked commercial aircraft and turned
them into suicidal war planes as they crashed them into the World trade center,
the Pentagon and a field in Shanksville, Pa. Two thousand nine hundred and
seventy seven died at the hands of these mass murderers. So much has changed
since then but what has remained the same is the threat that Radical Mohammadism
poses to liberty centered societies everywhere, everyday. Also, pray for the
families of the dead and those who survived with scars of body and soul.
Congratulations to the
people of Australia for voting for Tony Abbott to be their next Prime Minister.
Great job in "temporarily" reversing course on the road to Serfdom; it seems
that they took a break from that useful idiots thing. Don't worry, the leftist
will be trying to keep successful people from being successful. They might even
bring in James Carville or Paul Begala to help show the Aussies the "error" of
their ways for voting for Abbott and the center-right Coalition. The left loves
to spread the misery around and will be going cold turkey for a while until they
block prosperity creating legislation or fabricate and exaggerate some "scandal"
to thwart Australia's overall economic revitalization. They know that allowing
individuals independent prosperity will doom their efforts to keep a people down
by Socialistic micromanagement. The cat will be out of the bag. America, it can
happen here too.
Hillary "Benghazi/4dead" Clinton is not going to allow the
individual to prosper when and if she becomes president in 2016, so follow
Australia's lead America. Block the socialist-green weenies in the House of
representatives and Senate so liberty can show what we can do for ourselves.
President Oblabla will
soon give a national address to the American people on the merits of WWIII as he
fights his personal battle to save face and idiotic choice of words with the
United States military. Secretary of State John Kerry will continue to look
French-like and foolish. Some Democrats will not point out how illogical and
self serving military action in Syria is at this point in time because Oblabla
is black. Think of it, they are being racists in the name of not being racists.
Russia will posture and
try to "resolve" the conflict but not before they make out strategically and
financially. The Syrian "rebels/Muslim brotherhood" are patient and look long
term so they will just wait their turn and keep reproducing like bunnies,
recruiting like Jehovah's Witnesses, growing stronger and infiltrating the
powers that be until they get their next turn. Oh yeah, as members of the
"religion of peace" they will coerce conversions by bullet or blade to their
"religion of peace" as they demonically destroy great sites of historical
significance to the people of Christ and the rest of the civilized world. And
these are the people Oblabla wants to be in power in Syria.
That's right, he knows
the path to peace better than all the rest of us-he did win the Noble prize for
peace. Remember he said "Don't bring a knife to a gun fight". Peace maker in
chief doing peace loving things as the anniversary of 9/11/01 approaches.
Brilliant! All of his supporters are proven to be useful idiots once again,
since they bought the lie that he told them about foreign entanglements and
"stupid wars". Stupid is as stupid does!
On August 6th, 1945 the
United States dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima Japan. The city of
Nagasaki was next, on August 9th, 1945 it was bombed with a nuclear bomb.
On August 15th, 1945 Japan announced it would surrender to the Allied forces, of
which the United States was the major party. In conclusion, Japan signed the
instrument of surrender on September 2, 1945 formally ending World War II. It
was a sobering and solemn occasion albeit a great victory over an enemy of
devout purpose. Not a place in the heart or mind of those directly or indirectly
involved with the prosecution of that war missed the significance of that
surrender. The Japanese were going to fight to the bitter end with every man,
woman and child. They only surrendered when hundreds of thousands of their
fellow countryman were killed or injured by the newly unveiled atomic bomb. The
necessity of such force was unfortunate but it was inevitable. The Japanese
plans for military domination of Asia were providentially ended and many lives
were saved as a result.
It is said that "as one
thinks, so they are". We have written this before and related it to the
philosophical predicate of governmental policy. The human race has not changed.
The freedom that we enjoy is not a sure thing. In fact, it is under attack as it
always has been but the difference now is the miss-education and destructive
mindset promulgated in the American school system will destroy us from within
and our heritage will be taken. Victory over Japan in WW II was a victory over
the forces of imperialism and wide eyed fanaticism. It was clearly defined and
understood by America and her allies. Such absolutes are not the case today
because of the mind set that currently is held by the progressive/liberal forces
in our government today and is being taught in most of the public school system.
The hierarchy of good over evil has always been under attack. Now it is being
attacked from the inside out by misguided and hateful blind leaders of the
blind. For them, it is a instinct to seek tyranny. For those of liberty, it is
our calling to fight tyranny and identify it as such.
Simple
sentences will be used in this editorial. The facts of this case will be easier to understand this way. George
Zimmerman was acquitted on charges against him stemming from his role in the death of Trayvon Martin.
Trayvon Martin was shot by George Zimmerman. Trayvon Martin was in the process
of physically beating George Zimmerman to the point of unconsciousness. George
defended himself. George shot Trayvon and Trayvon died. George Zimmerman was watching
out for the neighborhood where this happened. George was looking to keep crimes from happening.
George was
an extra set of eyes and ears for local law enforcement. George saw Trayvon
walking. Trayvon was walking through a gated neighborhood. George called 9-1-1.
He did so because he was suspicious of Trayvon. His suspicions about Trayvon
came from the time of night Trayvon was there and the recent rash of burglaries
in the neighborhood.
Trayvon was not using
common sense. The best way to stay safe is to avoid danger. Trayvon made
himself suspicious. The place to be was somewhere else. When these factors are
eliminated the danger is greatly reduced. Trayvon died a needless death. It was
highly preventable. It is grievous for everyone who respects life.
George called 9-1-1that
night. He was providing the information in real time to the police dispatcher
concerning Trayvon. George sought to prevent crime. When Trayvon beat George to the
point of self defense, George stood his ground-he defended himself. The police who first responded to
the case saw this. The jury did too. It is a shame all can't see this.
There is not much independence to
celebrate with the looming implementation of Obamacare. The
historical context of the colonial break with England and the great, great
sacrifice to ensure it are being squandered. In this context, increasingly, more people have lost
their apatite and understanding for independence and have become dull of
their responsibility to secure self determined liberty. If this course is not
altered and liberty valued, every subsequent year will yield less and less
liberty.
The congenital conflict
between liberty and tyranny in governance is a permanent condition of humanity;
only the venues and expressions change. The separation of powers as set forth in
our constitution are meant to stay our sad propensity for self incarceration.
The news of today originates from a script long ago written. As the marketing of
the persona of modern liberalism slowly gives way to the Marxists personalities
behind it, the obvious is obvious to those Americans with eyes to see and ears to
hear and their numbers are growing. More people are relating to the tyrannical
scandals and seeing through the means and motives behind them. Those abridging
liberty are "old wine in new bottles". There really should be no surprise here.
Morally bankrupt is as morally bankrupt does.
The problem of securing a
country, any country is in the determination of national best interest. What
type of country shall we be? Based upon what? What is the scope and nature of
our laws as pertaining to national preservation? It is said that freedom isn't
absolute and comes about only with the denial of individual rights. True to an
extent. The
fulcrum of individual liberty rests upon the capabilities of the governed to keep those
accountable for whom they voted to govern them. Therefore, the degradation of
individual rights would not be so great if those who are opposed to our
constitutional republic were not allowed entrance into America. They can't blow us
up if they are not here to begin with! We wouldn't need to look under every
rock, bed sheet and hard drive if the government would do it's
constitutionally mandated job of securing the borders.
"Dissent is the highest
form of patriotism" said Hillary Clinton in criticising George W Bush. In her
politically motivated diatribe against the effort to rid the world of Saddam
Hussein, she didn't want the lines so clearly drawn so as to allow the
Republicans the place of leadership in fighting global terrorism. That
impression would be politically disadvantageous to the left. So conversely and
ironically, when this current regime seeks to squelch dissent and uses all the
technological power at its disposal to do so, we find that "dissent is NO
longer the highest form of patriotism. Separate but very unequal for sure.
Recently, the
commemoration of June sixth, 1944 (D-Day) where history saw the allied forces
establish positions at five beaches in France against the occupying forces of
Nazi Germany was very sobering. So much was won and lost there and we still live
free because of those who sacrificed there. In their memory we should never seek
armed conflict and the horrors that accompany such. Think about it, America has
a monetary debt problem. Metaphorically, America also has a debt problem of a
debt that can only be repaid with the continued respect of those who died to set
and keep us free. Our votes and voices must always be heard to secure these
freedoms. That is what makes the new "Operation Overlord" of the current
administration so wrong and so grievous.
Let us not fall in line with the rest of history, whose fate was described by
Alexander Hamilton when he wrote..."But if experience, in this instance,
verifies the lesson long taught by the enemies of liberty, that the bulk of
mankind are not fit to govern themselves; that they must have a master, and were
only made for the rein and the spur; we shall see the final triumph of despotism
over liberty; the advocates of the latter must acknowledge it to be an ignis
fatuus, and abandon the pursuit. With the greatest advantages for promoting it
that a people ever had, we shall have betrayed the cause of human nature.---A
letter from Hamilton to the citizens of New York containing remarks on Mentor's
reply, 1784
Greater love hath no man
than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. These were the words of
Jesus that gave the full import of his pending crucifixion and self sacrificial
death for all humanity. In America, Memorial Day is a day of remembrance and
recollection of the mental, emotional and physical sacrifices made by our men
and woman for our freedoms sake. When considered, the cumulative effect of these
sacrifices, for the good of the way of life we enjoy, is overwhelming. We are
blessed as a nation because of people willing to put themselves second to the
cause and blessing of liberty. However, these are perilous times since the
external enemies of liberty have infiltrated the instrumentalities of our
society and the government thereof. These are those that put themselves first
and the country second. It is evident who they are. When their ethos prevails in
government, we loose liberty. Conversely, when country is first, when we come
second, when we are a nation of laws and not a nation of men, we gain liberty.
It has been said that
"eternal vigilance is the price of liberty", yes this is true. We must stand
guard and watch against the despoilers of liberty. The question for this
Memorial Day is do we, as a nation, have the sufficient moral clarity and
fundamental discernment of what will enhance and grow liberty or do we lack the
substance of national identity and purpose as a free people so as to be blind
and ignorant to what will keep us free? Can we identify the threats and fight
against them? Do we know what liberty means thereby valuing it and fighting to
preserve it? Or, is it the sad case of "where there is no vision, the people
perish"? Without proper values and an informed national consensus rooted in our
history as a nation, we will loose our liberty. Of our veterans, "some gave all,
all gave some", but all will be in vain if we allow those enemies from within to
take away our freedom and make us all wards of the state. Thank you vets for
your love of country. Vote to stay free America.
E Pluribus Unum. This
phrase is commonly rendered in English as "out of many, one". It was the de
facto motto of the United States when this country began. Despite the
differences in the colonies over many different matters, this simple phrase
addressed the need for national purpose and unity. It was this primary and basic
awareness of the need for unity that drew the colonies together against the
greater enemy of the British crown. Later in this nation's history, president
Lincoln, with his "House divided" speech made clear the need for national unity,
lest our country fail and become disparate parts of contending factions. Lincoln
said..."A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government
cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to
be dissolved—I do not expect the house to fall—but I do expect it will cease to
be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other." So it is today in
America; division and disunity are growing stronger by the day. Our sense of
national purpose is fragile and the prospects for reversing this trend is bleak.
Some politicians in this
country are made strong by our national disunity. Divide et impera. Divide and
rule is their de facto motto. So, when we hear commencement speeches made by
the president before a primarily black student body and audience about how the
wounds of past racial injustices are just as raw and insurmountable today as
when they happened decades and even hundreds of years ago, we can be sure that
his intentions are to divide the people. He chooses an audience that has been
groomed to see the world as antagonistic to them, manipulative of them and
prejudicial toward them to the point that they cannot make much of themselves
without the direct involvement of some government program or assistance. Most of
the content of his speech was designed to provoke anger and inflame the passions
of what is worst in human nature against their fellow man. Divide and conquer.
Don't assimilate young graduates, thereby becoming independent of the
government. No, stay full of alienation, mistrust and discomfort about the
country in which you live. Not, "out of many, one". Divide and conquer for me,
says the president. You will never "fit in". You are the off spring of slaves!
President Obama is a man who sees the world with a chip on his shoulder. He
seeks to effect vengeance upon the U. S. A. because a "white man's greed drives
a world in need".
How is that hope and change
working out for you black America? Look at Obamanomics in real time. If we look
at deeds not words, it is worse today than it has been since the Reagan
administration fixed the damage that the Carter administration inflicted on the
black community. Candidate Obama received 96 percent of the black vote in 2008 and
nearly the
same percentage in 2012, against the back drop of a worsening unemployment crisis among
blacks. The record shows unemployment at fourteen percent for adults and forty three percent for
sixteen to nineteen year old teenagers, blacks, despite hope and change, still have the highest jobless rate of any
minority group in the U.S.
If any of us red, black,
white, yellow, brown, chartreuse, polka dot, etc want to have a better, humane,
equitable and stronger country try rejecting the race baiters. Racism in and of
itself is harmful enough and should be unanimously condemned. Racism for power,
prestige and profit by the ruling class is worse because generations of people
are enslaved to mind control and financial ruin. All races must unite against
it. Vote away from
office the race hustlers and call them out for who they are. Then and only then
will ALL of us be free and united at last; thank God almighty free at last. E Pluribus
Unum!
Have the scandals of the
Oblabla administration got you down? Have you been saturated and disgusted by
the elitist, self appointed and self anointed communistic creeps in the
compliant news factories. Has their divestigative not investigative "reporting"
worn your psych down to the bone? Well, there is hope for you, beleaguered
conservative/libertarian! Here it is. The highest calling that one can have in
this day of identity politics is to be (drum roll please) an OFFENDED
AMERICAN!!!
This is the holy grail,
holy ground and holy smoke of all groups known to exist in all of politics. It
transcends race, it transcends gender, it transcends your mommas apple pie! All
one has to do is name it and claim it to immediately gain the high ground in any
debate or discussion. For example, four Americans died in a negligent homicide
scenario in the Benghazi attack and an Obamabot spokes puke goes on with Fox
news with Chris Wallace and claims that Wallace is "offensive" in his
questioning of the whole wretched affair. There you go ladies and gentleman,
under any and all circumstances claim to be an "offended American" and you,
that's right you will be on the moral high ground.
Sergeant Shultz from the
classic television show, "Hogan's Heroes", knew more of what was going on during
his watch than President Oblabla, Attorney General Eric With-Holder, the I R
Slave Masters and Sir Edmund Hillary Rodham-Clinton purported to know about the
current batch of scandals that involved their direct oversight. If they didn't
know what was going on, then who did? If they didn't know what was happening
then it is time for someone to take their place because these people have the
competence of an egg plant. There is blood on their hands. People died because
they didn't know what was going on. Constitutional liberties were abridged
because they didn't know what was going on. American citizens were turned into
enemies of the state because they didn't know what was going on. These people
are really, really selective with their memories. They will tell you all about
what happened, real or imagined regarding the Bush years, yet lack any
recollection of what happened several months ago. You useful idiots that voted
for these low-lives will drown in the tyranny along with the rest of us unless
you LEARN from you mistakes and in 2014 vote as many of these parasites OUT OF
OFFICE.
The statists, in order to
realize their goal of complete governmental and societal control in the United
States, need a way to fight against and defeat the bill of rights as found in
the Constitution. Their goal of a strong, centralized government is an ongoing
effort being fought against the basic liberty of a free people. The purpose of
the first ten amendments to the constitution are to limit a self serving government
and protect individual liberty. The freedom of speech as protected in
the first amendment is an effective tool that ensures the political speech of a free
people unless a centralized, authoritarian government can
control, harass and intimidate a people to speak freely no longer. The second
amendment provides for, among other things, the right of self defense to ensure that
governmental tyranny is held in check by
a free people.
Currently with the
recently revealed scandal with the I R S, the progressives-elected or
appointed-fight to keep dissenting speech as silent as possible. Agree with us?
Well, we will grant your group tax exempt status. Disagree with us-well, let's
talk about the who, what, where, why and when about your group. Then we
will use what we have strip minded from our statist inquisition of your group
against as many public figures that we disagree with! Groups wanting to
represent the cause of liberty need to be watched for "extremism, etc".
Progressive groups are given the green light and sail, expeditiously right
through the process. This violates the fourteenth amendment of the constitution
equal protection clause. The bottom line with the anti-liberty statist is to
control the speech of as many dissenting voices as possible-by any means
necessary. Then with "gun control laws" deny the people the right of self
defense against a tyrannical government and other assorted criminals. Wake up
and see the pattern of control, control, control! It is time for America to take
back control of an abusive and out of control government. The progressives want
a "positive" bill of rights, so they say. We can see what they really want by
these scandals. We might decide to
wire tap you for good measure-right Associated Press!
Transparency is as
transparency does. Not much of that going on from the Executive branch. They
have a "lumpy rug" of tyranny that might be in the process of being swept out
with some basic reporting from the liberal press. That I R ess thing
might be causing a bit of "jitters". Over sees, and in the WH registry the anti
porcine brother hood is giving them pause. Kosher phobics have his
ear because he always had a call to prayer soul. Professional profiling of the
freedom Luddites juxtaposed upon the sheeple. Arugula for breakfast? Home grown
misanthropic Alinskyites are feeling the mojo of political nihilism. Got to wish
them fell. Reference the W hite h Ouse dot for a clue for feel good, open
gubment, hyper hypocrisy. Who is this guy, Neb gazzzzi? Fear them, yet posit the
solution of self governance. Don't regret the life that you are living. Regret
the life that others would have you live. This emperor has no clothes-do you
have any self respect? O wait, some one left a dog on the roof...
Global warming is a servile
mechanism of fear. It is based upon a priori reasoning and is prolepsis for man
only being a part of nature and not the principal of nature here on earth.
Remember; fear equals research funds, therefore we will have fear! If the one
world globalist were consistent in ideology, evolution would dictate man as
unchallenged controller of the world he lives in and not to be controlled by
the flora and fauna he dominates. Man made global warming was created by the
left to keep the individual from realizing their God given right of freedom.
Their plan calls for America to slow up and scale down and have a diminished
quality of life in a more heavily regulated and governmentally "patrolled" way
of life. In the past, nations around the world would look to things like the
Kyoto treaty to make things more "fair" because America is just too big for it's
own environmental britches and needs to come down to their sorry economic pace,
so they imply. This is wrong-we have national sovereignty. We make it happen for
good in the world and should not be so foolish as a people to succumb to the
siren sound of chicken little-even if he wears a white lab coat and has a PhD.
Our hope in keeping this pseudo-science from hurting our personal and economic
freedom is that BOTH sides of the issue are looked at in light of their
legitimacy. However, simple common sense and fundamental truth derived from
proper science don't generate much research grant money. That money is the green
upon which "big green" depends and their collective hands are insatiable.
To quote the preacher of
the hate church where president Obama attended, Reverend Jeremiah
Wright,..."America's chickens have come home to roost". They are the roosting
birds of Obamacare. These birds are so foul (pun intended) that the ruling class
wants to be exempted from them. Imagine that! Those public servants! Liberals
are all about equality, right? They are so happy with all forms of "equality",
except when it comes to living under the laws that they pass. Civil rights and
separate but equal and all that are causes that bring them votes and they use
them for their own good-they really don't care about anything else. Fourteenth
amendment be damned! The point is being made once again that you are the ruled
and they are the rulers. We are not citizens, we are subjects.
Earth day 2013 is here!
Yeaaaaah!
President Obama's fiscal 2014 budget is here, too! Yeaaaaah! It was only over
two months late
after the legal deadline. Remember, he won't rest until he rests and he is, let
me guess..."fighting for you". Wow, let's take a look at the budget in light of his "wise
stewardship' of U.S. taxpayers dollars, shall we?
He is so committed to his core
values of environmental commitment that we are sure that we can be sure that
anyone who disagrees with him obviously lacks sufficient commitment to see his
commitment to a greener future for our children and their children's children's
children. So what we have in the budget, are, as the result of the subsidization
of "renewable, sustainable, earthen, papoose friendly, mountain water high
colonic, greenie weenie" energy sources are energy sources that can't compete
one on one with the horrible and mean spirited Republican fossil fuel sources.
Meanwhile, this administration targets with taxes and ultra regulation the
suppression of market based efficiencies inherent in the production oil, coal
and natural gas. You just have to have a green feeling when you consider that
the Obama family presidential vacations are producing more outhouse gases than a
large village in China-post digestion cabbage gas production.
As the details emerge
regarding the who, what, where, why and when of the Boston Marathon bombing we
can see that once again that wonderful and beneficial "religion of peace" has
killed, injured and maimed more people. This time it is two brothers from
Chechnya who lived in America, went to college in America and committed murder
in America. These are two seventh century barbarians who demonstrated the
peaceful nature of their "faith". These brothers were supposedly so upset and
full of "righteous" indignation that they "reasoned" the best way to "correct"
the moral excesses of the decedent United States was to blow up two pressure
cookers laded with anti-personnel nails, bb's and ball bearings in a crowd of
unarmed civilians.
As of this writing the
response of law enforcement brought about the death of the oldest brother. A man
hunt is on for the younger brother. It is clear that this will be costly for the
police budget and local economy. Again, the "religion of peace" bring us such
blessings and joy as these worms further decay our liberty and erode our quality
of life. Our current president has vowed to catch and bring to justice those who
were responsible for the bombings. This looks to be most likely at this time
since one brother is dead and the other is within reach of the police. The
police deserve every praise for their work.
However, there are some
questions to ponder. President Obama began his political career in the living
room of his neighbor Bill Ayers. Bill Ayers is a man who used bombs in the
bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, the Capital building in
Washington, DC in 1971 and the Pentagon 1972. Obama has shown no condemnation
for his friend and associate Bill Ayers. Birds of a feather. He is right it is a
shameful day-every day-in Washington, DC.
Political harlots exploit
the terrorism and terroristic acts of terrorist to advance their agenda of the
state and control of the American people. Terrorist exploit the mindset of the
liberals that was created by the political harlots that only through
"understanding" and the "peaceful sharing of power" will peace be had in our
time. The goal of both groups is to deprive us of our liberty and self
determination by intimidation. Reagan had it right..."peace through
strength"...is the only way out of this.
The beginning of wisdom is
the definition of terms. When we identify the meaning of the terms in use
relating to the "gay marriage" issue we need to define what marriage is.
Currently, fundamentally marriage is a legally binding unification of a male and a female as
recognized by the state and or church. This legal arrangement is seen by the
state as being mutually beneficial to the married parties and the state.
In practice, the state is benefited by the stable family relationship found in a
good marriage and the married couple is benefited by the legal protection
afforded them by the
state in contractual matters.
The beneficial nature of good
marriages is also found in the procreation of the next generation. It is
essential that this takes place so that society can replace the dead. This is
axiomatic. Some of the discussions concerning this issue are elementary, basic and
simple. How hard is it to know the DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MALE AND A FEMALE? Nature
provides the definition. For those of you missing the point: hermaphrodites don't
define the rule of the gene pool. A same sex marriage is impossible because of the
impossibility of sexual reproduction by those of the same sex. If this definition is changed
then any and
all definitions would be legally permissible. Polygamy, polyandry, incestual marriages,
group marriages, marriages to animals, etc, would, by precedent, as undergirded
and authenticated
with the premise of equality and non-discrimination, thereby become law. This would
cause societal disorder and degradation of the basic moral core of this country.
It must be noted that a legally drawn up domestic partnership contract will solve the legitimate legal and contractual problems in same
sex partnership situations.
It is proffered by the
advocates of gay "marriage" that they want the same civil rights as
those who can legally marry. They equate their struggle with the civil rights
sought out by blacks and other minorities. This is baseless comparison since
homosexuality is a behavior. Being a minority or black is a matter of race. It
is myopic and self indulgent to equate the civil rights struggles blacks have
endured and overcome with homosexuality.
The cultural ramifications
would be substantial if same sex marriage became legal. The religious freedom of
many in this country would be at variance to this new standard of marriage.
Homosexuality is prohibited and declared a sin in many faiths in America. When
it is preached against by people of faith, the "legally" married couple would
claim that they are being discriminated against. Hate crime anyone? The school
curriculum would also be changed to accommodate homosexuality as normal.
These are a few examples of what comes next societally.
The Declaration of
Independence spells out how our rights are given by natures God and governments
are instituted by man to protect these rights. The government can't legitimately
create rights that don't originate from God. Marriage is from God and an
honorable government protects it. Marriage is
between the opposite sex as nature shows and needs for replication of the human
race. Same sex "marriage" therefore, by definition, is illogical and an impossibility.
The collectivists in America have used a
progressive approach to take away individual freedoms. These changes are
accomplished gradually and happen at a pace that a "new normal narrative"
has been
created and it thereby assuages and squelches opposition. Unfortunately, this
hypnotic progression even works on those on the right. So it was a fantastic
thing to see Senator Rand Paul (R) of Kentucky take a public stand against the
use of drones against American citizens on American soil. Paul went on
record with a filibuster in the U.S. Senate to command attention that this
president or any other president does NOT have the legal right to kill any American at any
time for any reason, minus due process of law regardless of context as a
terroristic threat. He wanted to shine the light on just how
our rights as Americans are absolute and not subject to prejudice and any whim
from the executive branch.
With the filibuster Paul found criticism from members
of the Republican party establishment. Senators John McCain (AZ) and Lindsey
Graham (SC) who were eating dinner with President Obama at the time that the
filibuster, petulantly whined that the filibuster was misguided at best and
crazy at worst. Their blindness to the ruthlessness of the President is what is
crazy. They are losers and have lost whatever capability that they may have had
to lead the opposition to Obama. The GOP must build on
this momentum created by the filibuster else a third party emerge. It is the grand old party not the go
along party or the party is over.
The left in American politics
is very crafty and surreptitious in method and operation. They seek to "control
the message" in policy, appearance and governance. The way that they go about
their tactics shows that they must put much effort into affecting the political
narrative and the cause and effect of their policies. Their policies are bad
news for basic liberty. The left knows this and lies about it as they punish
wealth and success for everybody but themselves. They are practiced at deception
and very knowledgeable about the psychology of group think. The policies and
goals of the left serve to minimize freedom for the individual and maximize the
power and control of the government.
They say that they are
fighting for the "little guy" against "powerful forces" and that without them
all hope would be lost for a decent life and freedom would be nearly extinct.
Yet, if we look closely at their words and compare them with their deeds it is
obvious that they frame the issue to hide the damage that their policies have
wrought. For example, they use words like "choice", "fairness",
"opportunity"," affordable", "reproductive rights" etc. To the left, when they
say choice they mean conformity. "Fairness" means fairness for the state and
unfairness to the individual. Opportunity means conformity to the dictates of
the government for a strings attached government program. "Affordable" means the
devastation of the real estate market-see Barney Frank. Reproductive rights
means state funded abortion on demand, this obviously doesn't apply to the
pre-born. They use words to create the perception and world view that are quite
the opposite of the real world.
The left in American politics
also, as a result of the long and determined, brick by brick, progressive
construct of obfuscation regarding their damaging policies and governance become
extremely agitated and wildly exited when any EFFECTIVE attempt is shown by
their opponents to counteract them. They hate it when the right fights fire with
fire, because they know how successful such an approach it is.
The left will tell you what
they are afraid of politically, one simply has to have the trained eye to see
it. Examples are Clarence Thomas, Rush Limbaugh, Fox news, the NRA, Sarah Palin,
The Drudge Report and The Tea Party, etc. Thomas is a black conservative that
proves them wrong about blacks being perpetual victims of racism. Limbaugh
dissects the falsehoods and media bias with wit and biting satire and brings the
factual refutation of the folly of the left on over 600 radio stations
nationwide. Fox news present both sides of the issues and prompts the viewer to
think for themselves to arrive at their own conclusions. The NRA stands guard
against the progressive degradation of one of the key amendment in the bill of
rights. Sarah Palin is a conservative female that shows that the left doesn't
own the female vote and that there are many women who don't suffer fools gladly
when it comes to big and unaccountable government. The left would burn books it
disagreed with in America today, but because of the carbon footprint of such,
they do the next best thing by bashing Matt Drudge and The Drudge Report. The
Tea Party is a threat because they are not "we the sheeple, they are we the
people". The tea party is a threat to the whole system of political favors and
the blatant cronyism and nepotism that is practiced by the Washington
establishment.
This leads to the
Sequestration. The small amount of budget reductions in spending (NOT
EVEN REAL CUTS) is not going to be as catastrophic as the hype says that it will
be. Sure, the design of the sequestration will be to pressure the American
psyche into seeing that certain high profile goods and services will not be
there because of those evil Republicans. Surprise, it's all political!
In conclusion, all the
examples of what frightens the left and why shows what they see as their
strengths and weaknesses. These examples show how the right can turn the lefts
weaknesses into our strengths. The question is, can the leadership of the right
and Republicans in general recognize this and capitalize on it?
President Obama and the
supporters of the so called "Affordable Care Act" are practicing fraud by
omission. When the law was signed into law the American people were told...
On March
23, 2010, Obama said “If you like your current
insurance, you will keep your current insurance.
No government takeover. Nobody’s changing what
you’ve got if you’re happy with it.”
A new CBO
budget report released today says that’s
probably not true for 7 million Americans.
That’s the number who are expected to lose
employer-based coverage as businesses recognize
that its not worth paying for the government
approved plans when other options are available.
It is obvious
that the intent of the law is to make health
insurance so prohibitively expensive that private
insurance companies will not be competitive enough
to stay in business against the government issued
health coverage. The above statement is and was a
lie. At the time it was said, Obama knew that it was
a lie because he knew that the bill would put
private insurers out of business. He knew that
employer provided insurance would go away and
thereby ENSURE a government takeover. The mechanism
of administration of the health care involves health
care exchanges that didn't exist at the time that
Oblabla assured us that we could keep our current
insurance. Again, he knew that this distribution
system of exchanges would "change what you've got".
Keep in mind that the law will be gradually
implemented and as it progresses more and more
"surprises" will be revealed that will be the
opposite of what we were told. Again, more fraud by
omission. Those people who believe this man and his
ilk are useful idiots.
Imperiling all of the law abiding by restricting their
capacity for self-defense, the anti-second amendment forces are making it
easier for the criminal element to succeed by reducing private gun ownership.
The deterrent to criminality and the self policing our society gains by having
an armed people will disappear if our right to bear arms is abridged. This is
the legislative and cultural agenda of the Democratic party and the current
American president.
Juxtaposed upon the Democrats
intent to disarm the people of America is a maniacal "foreign policy" that arms
the Egyptian Muslim brotherhood! These barbarians control the instrumentalities
of power in that country and are to receive F-16 fighter aircraft and
two hundred M-1 Abrahams tanks. These will be used against Israel in warfare to
destroy that nation. Chaos is the freedom destroyers best tool to use to gain
the complete control of the citizenry in both situations. The building blocks
are in place and what is being done about it?
Our time on earth is a finite
non-renewable resource. An informed electorate votes in such a manner as to make
the best use of time for liberty's sake. Else, time is initially wasted by
voting for poor and inferior governance and time will then be needed to recover
from the initial bad decision. Inauguration day marks time and presents another ring on liberty's tree.
The rings of this blessed tree, through our nations history show both good and bad
voting decisions and the thick and thin of the effects thereof.
Metaphorically speaking, the last four years have proven to be a time of
general malnourishment for liberty's tree. Thomas Jefferson's admonition concerning
liberty's tree are forceful and powerful and should be properly understood never to mean anarchy or mindless bloodshed...
"God forbid
we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion.
The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part
which is
wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of
the facts
they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such
misconceptions,
it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty.
...
And what
country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not
warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit
of
resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right
as
to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives
lost
in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from
time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
It is its natural manure."
The nature
of our liberty is that it cannot come from man. It is from our
creator. The point of Jefferson's words here are to remind us
that liberty is always under attack. We should always look to
our liberty as a blessed gift and attend to it accordingly. The
wolves of political ambition are very strong in force right now.
Congress is currently nothing more than a parlor game for
eunuchs in it's efficacy. Let us inform ourselves with knowledge
and paramount respect for human life and dignity as we labor to
expand the reach of liberty's tree. Freedom cannot be
domesticated.
The road to servitude is
clear and wide open thanks to the complicity of the Republican house of
representatives with President Oblabla. The national debt and the running annual
deficit will continue to grow unabated after this current budget "deal". The current
percentage of gross domestic product being spent on the cost of the federal
government is about twenty four percent. That amount is the highest since world
war two and is increasing. The victory is for the left with these numbers
because they seek to reduce wealth. Less wealth means more dependency upon
government and the demoralization of a once free America. That is what Oblabla
meant by "fundamentally transforming America".
Their top down, centralized,
authoritarian, command and control government model depends on dependency. The
excessive spending is what the Democrats need to maintain their power over their
dependent constituency and they are never going to change course and relinquish
their power. As a result, the economy has been so enfeebled that self
sufficiency is becoming more difficult. The pocket book is no longer personal
but Uncle Sugar Daddy is right there putting ebt dollars in. This country is
being bought off person by person, street by street, etc. It is a war between
liberty and collectivism and right now the collectivist are winning. The world
is watching and they know that economically, America can't afford to keep this
up.
Remember that the federal
government spends 4 billion dollars per day of which forty percent is borrowed.
This rate means that in time 100% of the federal budget will be for interest
only. At that point, Oblabla and the anti-Constitutionalist will tell us that
they need some more time and it is exclusively the Republican's fault. The
really sad part is that there will be enough useful idiots that believe them.
A United States Senator is proposing to require individuals, as a condition of lawful fire arm
ownership, to provide personal photographic identification and fingerprints for the
purchase of fire arms. The problem with this? These laws won't work to prevent
the mass shootings such as in Newtown, Connecticut but they will work quite
effectively to diminish the Constitutional right of self defense. Those that
propose these laws know this and that is exactly why they want them. Progressively, as
these laws fail to prevent these mass shooting atrocities, that will allow them
the excuse that we need even MORE gun control. More shootings=more bad laws.
More bad laws=more shootings. Remember, in the macro view, the second amendment, that basic right
of self defense, is not given by man but by our Creator.
However, the incremental degradation of
that right is brought about by such laws as proposed by the likes of this
Senator,
et, al. Their cohorts see the horrible mass shootings, such as in Newtown,
Connecticut as emotional vehicles to be used to legislatively advance
their agenda to register all weapons and dramatically restrict the effect of the
second amendment. They have had, in years immediately past, multiple legislative opportunities to proffer gun
control legislation. Yet, however, they watch and wait to "do something about
it" and when the emotions run high and reason runs low they use that chance
to violate our right of self defense. Such legislative action would not be a positive in the polls (such
character) so they wait and anticipate for the next chance to steal away the
Constitutional right of self defense. These morally bankrupt, political harlots were willing to "let it go" until
now. These foes of essential liberty didn't have the "courage" to tell the truth
of what they are all about until their failings of their past "laws" came to
fruition. Suddenly, they want to portray themselves as " being there for the
children and the rest of a sane society". This Senator used to pack heat to
protect their own safety-but this right is not for the rest of their "fellow
Americans". These collectivist lie in wait to produce legislation that
exploits the short comings of human nature, thereby making all of us vulnerable
to crime and the legislation of these political harlots. They are practiced at
the art of deception and their political calculations drive their
votes-Constitution be damned! What about the slain? THEY DON'T CARE unless they
can gain political advantage from them. They are heartless.
Juxtaposed upon this, these
"guarantors" of the Constitution, want any requirements for photo identification
and or fingerprints for voting in elections to be labeled as oppressive and
disenfranchising. Why? Because they want to stuff the ballot box with every
vote they can beg, borrow or steal that abrogate the Constitution. Priorities
and motive are revealed by this legislation. Simply put, with the proposed firearm
requirements, our second amendment right is disregarded and our liberty reduced.
Conversely, with the abandonment of requirements for voter verification (photo
id, etc) made more sure through the lack of photo
identification, our sacred right to vote is adulterated and made a thing of
political sport. These legislators know that votes of illegal aliens are promoted and unchecked thereby
ensuring the anti-Constitutionalist power to rule over the American people. It
is fraud by omission to NOT have voter identification. It is clear that the
people who would be screened out as a result of voter identification, mostly "vote"
for the anti-Constitutionalists. The payback to these "unrestricted" illegal
voters is government goodies from Uncle Sugar Daddy. In summation, by voting against our second amendment and against voter photo
identification the left makes our country weaker and substantially more
vulnerable to criminal behavior. If anyone thinks that the left has our
country's best interest in mind they are useful idiots.
Merry
Christmas! Peace,
comfort and joy to all!
Newtown, Connecticut has become the latest
town and the the Sandy Hook Elementary School school the latest venue for the
display of the valuelessness of Godless humanism where a diabolical maniac
murdered innocent unarmed children and adults. How many times do we have to go down this road of individual accountability?
How many, many times do we as a nation, need the poisonous fruits of humanism to steer us
back to the fundamental rendition and recognition that we are to do unto others
as we would have them do unto ourselves? Judeo-Christian world view anyone? If
this is our integral, primordial morality, then no such shootings would EVER
occur. We must rehearse the matter, but in a different context, yet with the
same foundation, we see the same. Consider the earlier piece pertaining to the
Columbine school shootings...timeless principals of our humanity...he who has
ears to hear...
American School shootings and values neutral education-
the connection to and conflict with essential liberty
This is one of the most difficult topics on which to write an essay.
The grief and anguish for the slain is very hard to contemplate. It will never
leave those families who were savaged by those attacks. The parents will never
see their children again. On the morning of the shootings, unknowingly, the
parents saw their children for the last time. Can you imagine that empty
feeling? Pray and ask God to comfort them during this time of suffering and
great loss.
Some questions that arise out of these disasters have no answers. We will not
pretend that we have all the answers to this or any other tragedy. Evil exists.
Good exists. Sometimes, evil prevails.
When we analyze these events, some questions we think of are, "What caused
this?, and "What can we do to prevent this from happening again?" These
questions DO have answers. The reason this piece is written is to explore these
answers. The phrase that, "Those who don't learn from history, repeat it" is
quite true. Quotations are included from the founding fathers of American
government in the course of this essay to show that humanity has been here
before. The creators of the American constitution were people who met the
barbarians and realized that they are us, and therefore framed the constitution
and bill of rights around that painful reality in an attempt to check our sad
propensity for self destruction.
In questions of power, then, let no more be said of confidence in man, but bind
him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. --Thomas Jefferson
In our political world today, generally speaking, two types of governments
exist. With varying degrees of application, governments seek to keep societal
order and control. Totalitarian governments control their citizens thoughts,
words and deeds by externally forcing their people to obey the code of law. In
order to bring this about, many personal freedoms don't exist. The government
controls the media and speech of the people to such an extent so as to keep all
activities working for the good of the state. The state sees religious
activities as a threat to it's primacy and atheism is primarily taught.
Individual liberty is a threat to the unified good of the state. Dissent is a
crime and carries a harsh penalty.
No government is respectable which is not just. Without unspotted purity of
public faith, without sacred public principle, fidelity, and honor, no machinery
of laws, can give dignity to political society. --Daniel Webster
In democracies and constitutional republics, such as in America, the primary
method of societal control resides within the people themselves as they exercise
INTERNAL control. This mechanism of order is predicated upon a moral consensus
shared by the society at large. One's respect for their family name or the great
spiritual truths derived from religious traditions informs their inner self as
to what is just and lawful. The guidelines are written on their heart and minds
to the extent that external laws are not generally violated. The external laws
exist to formally detail the law that operates within the internally controlled
individuals. This respect for rule of law is primarily enforced from the inside
out. It might be added that some unjust external laws exist, however, most laws
are enablers of liberty and not it's inhibitor.
John Adams said, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending
with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was
made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the
government of any other. Oct. 11, 1798, Address to the military
"Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best stage,
is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one." --Thomas Paine,
Common Sense; 1776
Being willfully ignorant of that vital element for a free society, deliberately,
over the last thirty years, our government, through the public schools, has
sought to exclude the great religious teachings that have fostered the mechanism
of INTERNAL control. Prayer was eliminated from public schools and evolutionary
teaching took it's place. Students who were once were taught that they were
created in the image of God are now being taught they were nothing more than an
end result of random chance mutations. God is degradingly portrayed as a crutch
and man is the rule maker is now the teaching. Furthermore, the teachings of the
home were ridiculed as being backward and restrictive upon "freedom". The creed
of the schools became "If it feels good-do it". If evolution is true, they
reasoned, why not? This is the ethos of the supposed "values neutral education"
and it threatens to permeate every aspect of our culture.
God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be
thought secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the
minds of men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be
violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect
that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.
--Thomas Jefferson
In time, as these students became young adults, their college professors built
upon these teachings. Then when these college graduates entered the work force
they brought this world view with them into their professions. They now occupy
political office. They are the "credentialed" experts who promulgate the public
school curricula. They are judges and attorneys. Some are school teachers who now
teach these things to subsequent generations; the morally blind now lead the
morally blind.
Thomas Jefferson wrote,
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it
expects what never was and never will be."
What are some of the fruits of all this? Convenience killing for one. Abortion
is called freedom of choice. We see that without God anything is possible.
Without the INTERNALLY applied moral restraint humans are able to rationalize
any behavior. External laws don't avail. The high school shootings are a symptom
of the moral void created by failing to educate the "whole person". External
laws are interpreted as encumbrances to "freedom". These laws are "someone
else's morality". If it "is my body, my choice" in one area of life, why can't
it be the same in other areas of life as well? At least their logic is sound.
Good government generally begins in the family, and if the moral character of a
people once degenerate, their political
character must soon follow. --Elias Boudinot, president of the Continental
Congress
So what happens to our society? Well you can bet the political harlots will
seize upon the visual shock therapy provided by the shootings to make themselves
"relevant" and enact new laws that will diminish the freedom of the law abiding.
Dozens of laws were in place that made what was done in these shootings illegal,
yet they happened anyway. Why are people so mis-guided as to think that more
laws will change this? It will only change when the internal laws are allowed to
function within us as they must. As pointed out earlier, societal control must
happen, it is just a question of how.
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants. -William
Penn
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the
fatigue of supporting it. --Thomas Paine
The present government will play both sides against each other with these type
of tragedies with the end result being more citizens loosing their God given
freedoms as the state passes more and more laws. Freedom and "rights" originate
with nature's God and not with man. Man by his government systems can either
impede or promote "rights". The only way that (exclusively) external laws work
effectively is when personal freedom is lost. The enforcement of this system
requires a police state. We are heading in that direction unless the lawful move
against this process in a systemic manner. The present government is fearful of
our capacity for self protection. They will seek to use these tragedies as a
pretence to emasculate and disarm this country. Do we dare trust them?
No free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest reason for
the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a last resort to
protect themselves against tyranny in government. --Thomas Jefferson
"The basis of our Bill of Rights comes from the teachings we get from Exodus and
St. Matthew, from Isaiah and St. Paul. I don't think we emphasize that enough
these days. If we don't have a proper fundamental moral background, we will
finally end up with a government which does not believe in rights for anybody
except the State!"
Harry S. Truman, Thirty-Third President
The solution to these shooting and other on going tragedies is to return to and
apply the necessary moral teachings that brought this nation about and gave it
animation. The ACLU will cry foul, however, but James Madison wrote,
We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity
of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to
govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the
Ten Commandments of God. --James Madison, chief architect of the Constitution
These fundamentals of our nation's heritage are NOT being taught in the public
schools and this is not by accident. The goal of unregenerate man is to control.
Freedom is a fragile thing and it cannot be domesticated. Values neutral or
values clarification in education is dangerous. The fetish to avoid classifying
behavioral choices as right or wrong is one of the greatest disservices a
government can bring about to it's citizens. The really scary part is the
government KNOWS that our liberty is going to gradually be diminished and this
is part of the formula to bring it about. We the people, I am afraid, have
forgotten the price of freedom. However, we are finding out the cost of having
done so.
I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the
people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and
sudden usurpations. --James Madison
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety.
--Benjamin Franklin
Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and
vicious, they have more need of masters.
--Benjamin Franklin
We have clear choices before us this day. We can continue down the path of least
moral resistance with all it's glossary of obfuscation and grotesque deceit. We
can be emotionally coerced into bowing to the kings contrivance in order to see
ourselves as "open minded" and "tolerant" as we embrace varying forms of
deviancy and normalize this now proven retrograde proscription. We can live in
denial about this for only so long, however. These events will become more
common and will undoubtedly become worse. In many respects, what these school
shootings represent is the beginning of the end of freedom as we have known it.
We can also begin the process of reversing the deterioration we see before us
everyday. The advantages are profound. The solution is simple. We the people,
the ones who know better, despite being characterized as unsophisticated and
elementary, must move to vote away those with these world views. We must remove
from our school boards these destructive teachings and their adherents. These
shootings and other moral enormities are the result of their approach. This is
what they have brought us. The wisdom of the people who began this
constitutional republic and codified the natural rights of man within the
constitution and bill of rights have to be taught to every child. Our heritage
and our humanity will be stolen if we fail to decisively act. This time, without
pretence, we must "do it for the children".
Let us not fall in line with the rest of history, whose fate was described by
Alexander Hamilton when he wrote..."But if experience, in this instance,
verifies the lesson long taught by the enemies of liberty, that the bulk of
mankind are not fit to govern themselves; that they must have a master, and were
only made for the rein and the spur; we shall see the final triumph of despotism
over liberty; the advocates of the latter must acknowledge it to be an ignis
fatuus, and abandon the pursuit. With the greatest advantages for promoting it
that a people ever had, we shall have betrayed the cause of human nature.---A
letter from Hamilton to the citizens of New York containing remarks on Mentor's
reply, 1784
12/13/12
What an irony for the union
leadership in Michigan to declare that non-union workers unfairly benefit from
the collective bargaining process. The union bosses are greatly dissatisfied
with the supposed situation that when union and management work together to
provide pay and benefits to the union membership, those who also work for the
company in non-management, non-union membership jobs benefit unfairly. Union
leadership reasons that for the non-member they don't contribute, yet they
benefit from the dues paying member. This is debatable.
This is again, very ironic
when overlaid upon the 47% of Americans that Mitt Romney said were virtually
unreachable and were sure to vote for President Obama. Most of these people are
receiving benefits from the producer class. The food stamp-ebt nation that
contemporary America has become is sustained by the tax dollars of others who
work for their living. It is funded by borrowed money from foreign lenders. This
is not debatable.
12/04/12
There are many forms of
slavery in our world today. While not to trivialize the brutal and inhuman types
and levels of slavery found in sweat shops, the sex trade and other absolutely
hideously offensive circumstances, we as ostensibly free people, here in
America, must remain on guard to the inevitable consequences of collectivism.
The market place is a mechanism of establishing worth of a commodity or other
goods and services between buyers and sellers. These exchanges are done
voluntarily for mutually beneficial ends. Each day more and more government
regulations, taxes and fees corrupt this process that potentially could result
in complete government control of the marketplace and with it, complete control
of the individual. The health care industry is being taken over gradually by
bureaucratic overlords and with it, the individual freedom to choose one's
physician and modes of treatment.
When the government has
control of the healing arts, the government has control of you. The state has
become the master and you it's servant. The fortifications that the government
has put into the health care law create progressively punitive enforcement
measures that will drive most of the private insurance companies out of business
and that in turn will result in a single payer health care system. Americans
will have to abide by the edicts of the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
The law was written "subject to construction". Pelosi's remark "that you must
pass it to see what is in it" rings true. The language of the law gives
unbridled authority to hyper bureaucrats to change policy what ever way that
they see fit. They have control over your body. Slavery is the result. Whoever
voted for the modern Democratic party to be in power have voted themselves into
the yoke of bondage.
11/29/12
The metaphor of the
"financial cliff" to describe the coming economic debacle is not accurate.
A more accurate one would be that the economy of America is in a real hole. Our
president and the modern Democratic party are trying to destroy wealth because
wealth is a threat to the financial dependency that is needed for them to control
the individual. When wealth is taxed, there is less of it. The whole point of
the redistributional collectivist is to reduce economic independence and
increase economic dependency. The poor and "middle class" don't go away
proportionally to the increased taxation of the "rich". The dog and pony show of
a "bi-partisan agreement" on the federal budget is just a ploy and a foil of the
collectivist to keep the wool over the eyes of the gullible American. Obama,
first and foremost, is
trying to take revenge on the wealth of this nation.
This
technique is not new. The new thing here is that so many Americans lack the
discernment and skepticism to figure this all out. Words and historical
precedent are ineffective to change the minds of the simple minded in this
regard. Events and dire consequences are the only way to cause these useful
idiots to see that they are being played for fools. If we look at the complete
confiscation of the wealth of the "rich" and were to give it to Uncle Sugar Daddy, the money
would not make the difference that the collectivists say that it would. They
would spend it just as they always do with "other people's money". Meanwhile, no
meaningful cuts in spending will happen and the country will go deeper and deeper into
debt. It is a macabre exercise in the absurd. To show a point of reference, the
recent power ball jackpot of over 550 million dollars would, as according to the
national debt clock, run the government for one hour and a half. These
federal programs and department budgets grow AUTOMATICALLY every year. It
staggers the mind to say that a "cut" is defined by reducing the rate of growth.
A cut in "Washington-speak" is to grow a budget at, for example, four percent
instead of six. Guess what? The budget is still GROWING!!! One hundred to be
used as par, for a
cut, would need to be reduced to a lower amount. One hundred needs to be REDUCED
to ninety nine or less. That would be a real cut. However, most of the American
voters are ignorant of this and this fraud and slight of hand continue unabated.
The dirty little secret is
that about 68 trillion dollars is owed to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid,
etc. This is in addition to the 16 trillion owed on the current operating
expenses. This debt is so large that it cannot reasonably be paid back. In
summation, taxing, confiscating, etc, the wealth of the rich won't put a dent in
the national debt. It is analogous to trying to sink a battleship with a bb gun.
The spending is the cause, pure and simple.
Democrats gain and remain in
office by providing all manner of public assistance that is funded upon the
backs of the producer class. The appetite of the dependency class for such is
growing larger by the day. There is no sense of the prerequisite pride shown by
them to free themselves for the cause of an independently lived better life.
this is a moral problem as well as a economic one. We need to have the growth of intrinsic
value and net worth coupled with job creation and the revenue increases that job
growth would create. The Republicans have their work cut out for them.
11/20/12
Thanksgiving in the United
States is to be a time of gratitude and fundamental appreciation for the
blessings we enjoy in this life. It is a time to take the time to give thanks to
our Creator. Unfortunately, the way our country is going, we will have less and
less to be thankful for. This is the result of the fallacy of liberal ideology
being taught and lived in our public schools, most universities and then put
into practice in society in general.
William Bradford and the
pilgrims were fooled into the socialistic model of government. It didn't work
then and it doesn't work now. Plymouth colony in Massachusetts or modern day
America have the same results from this "philosophy of failure, gospel of envy
and creed of ignorance" as Winston Churchill described it.
"'For this
community [so far as it was] was found to breed much
confusion and discontent, and retard much employment
that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For
young men that were most able and fit for labor and
service did repine that they should spend their time and
strength to work for other men's wives and children
without any recompense,'"....
"The experience that
we had in this common course and condition,'" Bradford
wrote. "'The experience that we had in this common
course and condition tried sundry years...that by taking
away property, and bringing community into a common
wealth, would make them happy and flourishing -- as if
they were wiser than God,' wrote Bradford."
"Every family was
assigned its own plot of land to work and permitted to
market its own crops and products. And what was the
result? 'This had very good success,' wrote Bradford,
'for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn
was planted than otherwise would have been.' .
Bradford saw that
collectivism breeds indolence and dependency. He also
saw, as did the other members of the colony, that when
incentive and labor and industriousness are rewarded,
everyone has a better quality of life. Through great
hardship of the voyage across the Atlantic and the
horrible toll that the winter took upon them, they
fought through it all, including socialism by seeking
out God's providence. Modern America must do the same if
she wants to keep receiving her rich blessings from God.
This is the abbreviated yet compelling story of
Thanksgiving. Let us give prayerful thanks as a nation.
11/18/12
Righteousness exalts a
nation. Envy does not. President Obama in his first post-election press
conference, paraded envy as the solution to the financial disaster that he and
his fellow travelers brought upon this nation. He is not illiterate when it
comes to economics and budgeting. He knows how to put policies into place that
will generate MORE tax revenue. He also knows, as all Marxists do, that the best
way to subdue and subjugate a free people is to reduce their opportunities for
financial success by reducing wealth by taxing it beyond its capability to
replace itself in the marketplace. Let's also look at his words that show what
he thinks about capitalism and his belief system that all money belongs to the
government.
If the rich pay more in
taxes, the middle class will also get hit. The ripple effect is real and the
Marxists know it. The behavior of the wealthy will not remain the same in the
face of higher taxes. The rich will reduce investments and reduce participation
in business ventures and entrepreneurialism. The middle class will have less
opportunities to have employment from the wealthy who would be using THEIR money
to grow the economy, produce jobs and generate MORE tax revenue.
By what objective standard
can the government honestly come to the wealth producers time after time after
time, with the same old sorry excuse that the rich are not paying their fair
share? The rich pay most of the taxes in this country according to the IRS and
for what? So Uncle Sugar daddy can hook the underclass on the addiction of
entitlements? So these people will vote to keep the gravy train coming their way
and blame the rich for their plight; this is morally wrong and antithetical to
liberty. Obama's response and logic behind his answer to a question from a
reporter is very revealing about who he thinks he is and what he has the right
to do.
Q: You've said that the
wealthiest must pay more. Would closing loopholes instead of raising rates for
them satisfy you?
A: I think that there are
loopholes that can be closed, and we should look at how we can make the process
of deductions, the filing process easier, simpler. But when it comes to the top
two percent, what I am not going to do is extend further a tax cut for folks WHO DON'T NEED IT, which would cost close to a trillion
dollars.
Wow, he has just showed us
the way to go. Imagine the possibilities! First of all, lets say a robber thinks that you don't need your
money-he needs your money-so he takes it. How about the illegal immigrant
thinking that you don't need your job-he does-so he takes it. Shopping for food?
This big rich store DOES NOT NEED to be paid for your groceries-take them-just
like Obama and the Democrats do with the wealth of the rich. You are completely justified-they don't need to
be paid. After all, they have more money than you, it is only "fair".
Obama and the modern day
Democrats show that they see all money as THEIR money. They make these judgments
and pronunciations that show their fundamental world view. They are envious,
bitter, covetous and a threat to the constitution and our basic human rights. We
have a morally bankrupt political party headed by a Marxist that hates the
individual's freedom to prosper. The tenth commandment prohibits coveting.
Exodus 20:17
Thou
shalt not covet thy neighbor's
house, thou shalt not covet thy
neighbor's wife, nor his
manservant, nor his maidservant,
nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any
thing that is thy neighbor's.
This is what we have in our
president and those that think
like him. Envy and covetousness
does not exalt a nation. We have
four more years of it. Pray for
America.
11/06/12
Elections results as well as
a civilization's direction go in cycles.
From bondage to spiritual
faith
From spiritual faith to courage
From courage to liberty
From liberty to abundance
From abundance to selfishness
From selfishness to complacency
From complacency to apathy
From apathy to dependence
From dependence to bondage again
The world has its eye upon
America with ever increasing scrutiny. The web makes it so easy. We are looking
weaker by the day. Our dependocrat citizens are ripe for the picking. We will
find our place in history as a vain nation that had the most and squandered it.
This election was a mirror of the American soul and the reflection showed an
incurable taste for the Trojan horse of socialism. With the reduction of wealth
will come the reduction of numerically represented votes that are cast by the
possessors of wealth for the defense of capitalism. As the wealth is taken and
given to the dependency class, the numbers of their votes will increase. The
hand writing is on the wall. The democrats rob Peter to pay Paul. Paul is broke
and they are blaming it on George Bush, etc. Alexander Hamilton had this to say
about it....
"But if experience, in this
instance, verifies the lesson long taught by the enemies of liberty, that the
bulk of mankind are not fit to govern themselves; that they must have a master,
and were only made for the rein and the spur; we shall see the final triumph of
despotism over liberty; the advocates of the latter must acknowledge it to be an ignis
fatuus, and abandon the pursuit. With the greatest advantages for promoting it
that a people ever had, we shall have betrayed the cause of human nature.---A
letter from Hamilton to the citizens of New York containing remarks on Mentor's
reply, 1784
11/05/12
Election day 2012 has
finally arrived in America. Without dispute, this election is the most critical
and pivotal in our lifetimes. The election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was the
most pivotal election in our nation's history. Lest, without the civil war, the country would have broken
apart in every way. The great depression and the election of FDR was a defining moment in the
administration of self-governance in America and in many ways is the bedrock
upon which today's socialistic superstructure rests. But the election of FDR was
but a start and it can be said that this election could be the finishing touch
of such
if Obama is re-elected. In 2008, when Barack Obama won the presidency, he
campaigned as an uniter. He ran as a transparent poly-partisan, person of
gender, a healer of the wounds of partisan origin. He was and is a media
creation in that regard. For when he won, he also had both houses of congress
and vigorously fought working with the Republican party. He chose partisanship,
division and discord. He told the Republicans, that they could come along, but
that they would have to ride in the back. His version of bi-partisanship was to
tell the world..."I won. So I think on that one, I trump you."
These quotes come
from a man who was and is a community organizer at heart and thrives as he
divides. He has shown who he is and how he thinks. America is more racially
divided after he took office than before. We have a choice. Unity or division.
On this we say vote for Romney. Reject the life boat, dog eat dog, ever
dwindling wealth scenarios of
Obama and his wealth destroying socialism. Embrace and vote for wealth creation.
In our economic system, when we proceed in this direction, everyone except the dependency overlords will benefit.
This election is crucial
because of Obama's potential supreme court appointees. Obama wants to negate,
through his appointees, the
constitutional protections afforded us in the bill of rights. His appointees to
the bench are selected to conform to a judicial orientation and temperament that
finds fault with the premise that government should be limited. He sees in the
constitution an encumbrance to government's proper place in the citizens lives.
The bill of rights LIMITS government. Obama wants to change that with the judges
that he appoints. Romney wants strict constructionists and judges of judicial
temperament who understand that the bill of rights should be protected and not
legislated away from the bench. Consider this from the Bible concerning choices
of leaders and realize that hope and change, in one form or another, has always existed. It is
far more than a vain emotional
phrase...
Israel Asks for a King
I Samuel 8:1-22
When Samuel grew old, he appointed his sons as
judges for Israel. The name of his firstborn was Joel and the name of
his second was Abijah, and they served at Beersheba. But his sons did not
walk in his ways. They turned aside after dishonest gain and accepted
bribes and perverted justice.
So all the elders of Israel gathered together and came
to Samuel at Ramah. They said to him, “You are old, and your sons do not
walk in your ways; now appoint a king to lead us, such as all the other
nations have.”
But when they said, “Give us a king to lead us,” this
displeased Samuel; so he prayed to the Lord.
And the Lord told him: “Listen to all
that the people are saying to you; it is not you they have rejected, but
they have rejected me as their king. As they have done from the day I
brought them up out of Egypt until this day, forsaking me and serving
other gods, so they are doing to you. Now listen to them; but warn them
solemnly and let them know what the king who will reign over them
will do.”
Samuel told all the words of the
Lord to the people who were asking him
for a king. He said, “This is what the king who will reign over you will
do: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and
horses, and they will run in front of his chariots. Some he will assign
to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to
plow his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons
of war and equipment for his chariots. He will take your daughters to be
perfumers and cooks and bakers. He will take the best of your fields and
vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants. He will take
a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials
and attendants. Your menservants and maidservants and the best of your
cattle and donkeys he will take for his own use. He will take a tenth of
your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves. When that day
comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, and
the Lord will not answer you in that
day.”
But the people refused to listen to Samuel. “No!” they
said. “We want a king over us. Then we will be like all the other
nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our
battles.”
When Samuel heard all that the people said, he repeated
it before the Lord. The
Lord answered, “Listen to them and
give them a king.”
Then Samuel said to the men of Israel, “Everyone go back
to his town.”
The Democrats always say that they
are "fighting for you". Just like the people in Samuels' day-there is a
sucker born every minute. In comparison to today, they got off easy. This nation falls for that
"fighting for you" shtick almost every time. The Democrats never finish
that sentence. What they are really saying is that they are "fighting
for you to stay dependent upon them so that they can have as much
control over and say so over you in every aspect of your life".
The reasons to vote Republican are
easy to understand. If you want greater dependency on foreign oil, an
eroding quality of life through higher food, gas, water, commodity
prices-vote Democrat. If you want your health care choices and cost and
quality of care greatly diminished-vote Democrat. If you want a military
that has seriously regressive resources, deficient funding and fading
moral-vote Democrat. If you want to hasten the moral decline and
accelerate the acceptance of decadence masquerading as "entertainment"
then vote Democrat.
If you enjoy the devaluing of
real-estate and home values and having the housing market controlled by
Dodd-Frank (they are no longer in office) then by all means vote for the
Democrats.
If you want to devalue the dollar and with it the
net worth of America, vote Democrat. If you want to continue to spend
four billion dollars every day and fund that spending with forty cents
of every dollar being borrowed and watch that percentage rise until it reaches 100% and
with it a national default and bankruptcy, then vote Democrat. If you
enjoy and approve of the endless minions of regulators and their
regulations using you as useful idiots in the airport "TSA zone", water
usage, "gasoline blends", mandatory menu postings for restaurants, dust
regulations, etc, then vote Democrat.
If you want to see our youth
squandered for the collective and made useful tools of the state, (with
the funding coming through property taxes), through the public education
system then vote Democrat.
If you want
to see the cost of borrowing for the consumer become so high that
virtually no one can pay the interest-let alone principal then vote
Democrat. If you want a wall of ignorance erected around our Godly
national heritage and with it a form of apartheid against the
Judeo-Christian world view then vote Democrat. If you want to end
liberty, end the state serving the citizen and in it's place have the
individual serving the state, then by all means vote Democrat.
If you want any of this then to end then vote for the Republicans. May God give this
nation eyes to see and ears to hear and a heart beholden to Him.
When the colonies were dissolving
from British rule, Patrick Henry gave a speech to the Virginia House of
Burgesses. His words represent the spirit and tenor of a war long fought
and recognized throughout the history of humankind. The very same
applies today and will be with us forever. Indulge yourself, educate
yourself and revitalize yourself to the focus of what is ever with us.
It is the congenital battle of freedom versus collectivism; only the venues
and particulars change.
Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death
March 23, 1775
By Patrick Henry
No man thinks more highly than I do of the
patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy
gentlemen who have just addressed the house. But
different men often see the same subject in different
lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought
disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I
do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I
shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without
reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question
before the house is one of awful moment to this country.
For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a
question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the
magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the
debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to
arrive at the truth, and fulfill the great
responsibility which we hold to God and our country.
Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through
fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as
guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of
disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere
above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the
illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a
painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till
she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise
men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for
liberty? Are we disposed to be of the numbers of those
who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not,
the things which so nearly concern their temporal
salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it
may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know
the worst, and to provide for it.
I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and
that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of
judging of the future but by the past. And judging by
the past, I wish to know what there has been in the
conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years
to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been
pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that
insidious smile with which our petition has been lately
received? (Oblabla has a great smile.)
Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your
feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss.
Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our
petition comports with those warlike preparations which
cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and
armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation?
Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled
that force must be called in to win back our love? Let
us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements
of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which
kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this
martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to
submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible
motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this
quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation
of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are
meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are
sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which
the British ministry have been so long forging. And what
have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir,
we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we
anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have
held the subject up in every light of which it is
capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to
entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we
find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not,
I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done
everything that could be done to avert the storm which
is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have
remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated
ourselves before the throne, and have implored its
interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the
ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been
slighted; our remonstrance's have produced additional
violence and insult; our supplications have been
disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt,
from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these
things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace
and reconciliation. (Hope and change anyone?)
There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free--if we mean to preserve
inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have
been so long contending--if we mean not basely to
abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long
engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to
abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall
be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must
fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all
that is left us! They tell us, sir, that we are weak;
unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when
shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the
next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and
when a British guard shall be stationed in every house?
Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction?
Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by
lying supinely on our backs and hugging the
delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies
shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak
if we make a proper use of those means which the God of
nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people,
armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a
country as that which we possess, are invincible by any
force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir,
we shall not fight our battles alone. There is
a just God who presides over the destinies of nations,
and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for
us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong
alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave.
Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base
enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from
the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and
slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be
heard on the plains of Boston! The war is
inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it
come.
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter.
Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace--but there is no peace.
The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps
from the north will bring to our ears the clash of
resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field!
Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish?
What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so
sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and
slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course
others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give
me death!
Do not be a
loyalist to the modern day incarnation to the Crown.
Vote for Romney/Ryan. Vote Republican and then hold them
accountable! Vote away the collectivists. We have the
greatest advantage for liberty the world has ever seen.
It is up to us.
10/26/12
The third and final
presidential debate concluded with little "won or lost" by either candidate.
Foreign policy tends to be less interesting than domestic issues to most
Americans and therefore this debate was not compelling as the first two debates
were. Yet we can see how very important foreign policy is as it relates to the
Benghazi atrocity. This administration knowingly allowed four Americans to die.
Despite repeated calls for help by our ambassador no help was allowed. The
decision was made to not help our ambassador during the attack or to help with
preparing for the anniversary of 9/11 with increased security at the U.S.
Consulate. Mitt Romney is for America and the safety of Americans around the
world. President Obama is against the safe keeping of Americans abroad. Whether
for keeping the politically crafted "Bin Laden" is dead and al-qaeda is on the
run message going or for you name it, this administration knowingly allowed them
to perish. This is tantamount to manslaughter. It is hard to believe that this
is what has become of our Executive branch. Vote them out, they are not on our
side, they are only for themselves. Foreign policy is in disarray and hurtful to
U.S. interests with Obama and it is time for him to go before any one else
looses their life.
10/18/12
Can water fuel a fire? Will
ice form at 90 degrees Fahrenheit? Is salt a fertilizer for crops? Can one
breath a vacuum? Obviously not; yet not so obvious to some American voters is
that debt doesn't lead to prosperity, that displacing prosperity with carnal
self indulgence somehow remedies a nation in moral decay, that capitulation to
envy and strife, finding place for division for politically useful benefit and
hatefully ignoring the philanthropic nature of free market economics will curry
votes for the betterment of America. If one objectively observed the town hall
style presidential debate between Oblabla and Mitt Romney, in it was shown, on
one hand, an incurable, psychotic malcontent (Barry O) with his mandated
predilection on spewing demagogic subterfuge whilst "getting even" with, as his
world view dictates, America-the mischaracterized robber nation. (He pronounced
his "sssss" so well.)
On the other side of the
debate was a man (Romney) who is equipped with the fundamental, real world
experience to recognize a nation in crisis, a nation that must correct course
and clearly can be lead by his real world experience to repair the damage done
by the left. He, in this debate, expressed an expectation that America can vote
herself out of the current socialistic bondage. The Candy Crowley effect was
minimal and the predictable bias was small. On to the next debate.
10/15/12
It's the next best thing to
book burning. America's promotional radio voice of liberty, Radio Liberty, will
cease to broadcast to approximately 150,000 Russian people on the AM band on
November tenth of this year. This is in response to a law passed in Russia that requires
companies that are more than 48 percent foreign owned to cease broadcasting to
Russia. When the Soviet Union was in force as a communist nation, these
broadcasts were a rare and powerful source of information for the captives of
communism. Our "flexible" president is showing what he values in this case, and
it is not liberty. What he is all about is the suppression of free speech. Where
are the liberals on this? They are in the same place that they were regarding the supreme
court ruling regarding the Citizens United vs. The Federal Elections
Commission. With the decision of the Citizens United case,
speech was expanded. With this situation regarding Radio Liberty, speech is
reduced. Wow, that is so Reganesque! Oblabla is so Reganesque! Try Castroesque!
If the price of your
liberty and self respect is an Obama phone, you are a useful idiot. The well has
run dry, in this generation, as it has and always will, whenever socialism is
tried.
10/09/12
A problem isn't always
obvious to everyone. When it IS obvious to everyone, it generally is too late.
For example, America's national debt. It has been extensively discussed on radio
and television, blogged about on the internet and read in the print media. Even
with the pending consequences that this debt brings such as currency
devaluation, higher interest rates for the borrower, lack of liquidity for the
commercial markets and the need for generations yet born to pay it off, many
Americans don't have the foresight to vote to correct this crisis. The Federal
Reserve has kept the problem from being functionally addressed by printing more
money and monetizing the payback of the debt. It is analogous to repetitively
changing the fuse in an automobile instead of addressing the cause of the short
and all the while melting the wires. Currently, the federal budget expenditures
are causing the debt to rise with every dollar spent because forty cents of that
dollar is borrowed. The leftist politicians in America have bought the votes of
a growing dependency class in this current generation with the prospective debt
of the generations yet unborn. The modern Democratic party is a party of
subjugation of the individual to the servitude to the state. The main stream
media assists them in disguising their methods and real term effects of their
socialistic policies. For them, it is not what is but rather, what it appears to
be. A strong and independent individual threatens their plans of societal
control. “Everyone sees what you appear to be, few experience what you really
are.”-Machiavelli, The Prince. (Except in the Denver presidential debate!) As
election day approaches, the problem of our national debt becomes more obvious
as does the solution to it. It is not going away by itself. Vote to end this
abuse of our economic liberty while you still can. It is sixteen trillion
dollars and when counting other unfunded programs it is over SEVENTY
trillion(2012) dollars. You can't say that you didn't see this one coming.
10/3/12
The first presidential debate
between President Obama and Mitt Romney wasn't a debate about superficialities.
This debate revealed the basic nature of each man and how he views his
responsibilities as a man and as an elected official. Character matters and it
is essential to keep the freedom we enjoy. Obama is a figurehead of the left
that is being asked to both advocate and defend ineptitude and ideological
obsolescence. Romney is an individual with credence and clarity. He has lived a
life that has made him aware of the goals of the gainsaying leftist and the
destructive nature of their philosophy. Obama is running for president to take
out his envy on liberty. Romney is running for president to make America proud
of herself as the greatest nation in the history of the world. He doesn't need a
teleprompter to do so!
9/20/12
In light of the recent video
revelations from President Barack-the redistributist-Obama and Mitt-freedom
knows best-Romney the American voter has seen the fundamentals of these two
candidates and should be pleased with this degree of candor. Neither should
apologize or change their words and "go wobbly" because of the media or public
reaction. Man up, as it is said, be who you are, beholden to no one other than
yourself and represent your words and deeds in this election.
Organic, intrinsic economics
provides the value upon which the world depends. No speculative theories, no
adjunct, no formulaic, no positor of economic justification, no fiat printing of
national worth will produce economic liberty. Organic intrinsic worth is barter;
either such is worth "it" or not. Not needed is this socialistic
"spread the wealth around" president who is a by product of wealth creation,
to declare to the producer class just how we shall live. Parasites don't call the shots
for the host; ibid: the rejection of the current Democratic party. That faction
of dependency is a hateful rendition of envy. Add to wealth, add to liberty, add
to self determination or subtract, retributionally, from the cause of freedom.
We know where they stand.
There is a basic governmental safety net in place to meet the needs (not wants) of
the poor, destitute, down trodden and economically disadvantaged among us.
Private charities exist as well as faith based institutions that do wonderful
work to help those in need and we all should be moved with compassion to help
them as best we can.
However, this safety net is
not to be a hammock-it's use should be temporary and those needing it should be
challenged to find work and be motivated to find their way to a better way as
soon as possible. This is the way to keep people independent and not needy of
the government for their daily bread. That was Mitt Romney's point in saying
that 47% of Americans are intractably addicted to government sustenance and
provisions to the point of being conditioned in mind and ethos so as to be found wards of the
state. Romney advocates the most compassionate and liberating approach to
maintaining and propagating liberty for a free people; that is self determination.
Conversely, if a people are told that they can't make it without the government
providing for their every need-and they fall for it-then they will vote for a
permanent hand out and not a temporary hand up. What of their children who grow
up with this mind set? Will they rescue themselves out of this entrapment? Will they
see through the comfortable trap of Uncle Sugar Daddy?
This election, with the
increasingly seismic 16 trillion pre-worth quake tremors being felt, the brazen
printing of currency diluting "Bernanke bucks" and the pending taxmageddon for
2013, etc, it is going to be a tough, tough awakening to the entitlement class.
Forty seven per cent does not compromise the dependency class.
NOT ALL those receiving public assistance are moochers. AGAIN, NOT ALL those
receiving public assistance are moochers. WE are talking about the freebie
minded, the world owes me a living grasshoppers, that see the prosperity and
success of others as something that they will never have and, as a result, jealously vote to
legally "steal" from the producers. Ergo the Congressional Research Service
report that shows a DOUBLING of able bodied people receiving food stamps. The
report says...
Under the rule adopted in 1996, food stamps for
able-bodied adults without dependents were limited to
three months in a 36-month period unless the participant
in the program “works at least 20 hours a week;
participates in an employment and training program for
at least 20 hours per week; or participates in a
(Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) ‘workfare’
program for at least 20 hours per week.”
Not military beneficiaries,
not social security recipients or any other false construct that the leech
masters present as "the heartlessness of Mitt Romney and the right"
are apart of the presupposed forty seven percent composite. So we say
again, let the candidates run on what they said in these videos. Those who pull
the wagon among us will out number those who are riding in the wagon and will vote
them into pulling with us as the well is about to run dry on the gravy train;
Sixteen trillion and counting.
Only prosperity and growth will once again put intrinsic food on the table and only the
Romney/Ryan ticket will do such.
9/18/12
Can anyone hope
for the best when the worst is championed as the best solution? Can anyone say
that our lifeblood is vouchsafed by the encroaching statist's rendition of
liberty?
Welcome to the philosophical
warfare of serfdom. Mitt Romney tells it like it is and the collectivist count
him as out of touch. This country is in deep trouble financially with it's debt
and credit downgrades. Growth and jobs are scarce because of it and that in turn creates
dependency and when Romney points this out his observations are derided and scorned.
When the dependency class in this country begins to be viewed as a permanent and
celebrated achievement by candidates for office, then the incentives to make a
better life for one's self and their family are ostracized by the welfare state.
Alexis De Tocqueville says it this way...
"But one also finds in the human heart a
depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to want to bring the strong
down to their level, and which reduces men to preferring equality in servitude
to inequality in freedom".
9/15/12
Four Americans unnecessarily lost
their lives as a result of a mindlessly indifferent and self absorbed White House and its
destructive Middle East foreign policy. So, all of you who voted for Obama, is
this what hope and change looks like? You useful idiots placed a myopic and vain
man in charge of one of the most complex and problematic geo-political cross
currents confronting the world today. His pathetic excuse for this disaster is
some moronic movie with minimal hits on the internet and microscopic exposure in
that part of the world. The corrupt media is complicitous in promulgating this
farce. The weakness of Obama's foreign policy and virtual abandonment of Israel
gave the green light to these hate mongers to indulge their hate.
In the currently championed, Abū
al-Qāsim Muhammad themed "American foreign policy" for the Middle East, we are given the occasion to see what
the left never saw coming. They are so blinded by their humanistic world view, the
elected powers
that be, that have had the helm of governance in the last four years, that they are spellbound
by their "higher learning" to obligatorily perform their folly as they fail
the cause of liberty for America. When the American voters elected
an unproven, unknown pawn of the seventh century legalistic cognitive
dissonance, albeit with a bright shiny face and popular and great swelling words
of vanity, "Yes we can", it was expected by the lemmings who voted for him that everything would be alright. Read the head
lines...it is not! What a ridiculous failure this gross ineptitude of a
president this man has been! His revenge against his personal perceived wrongs
in his formative years, is not the way to forge and conduct foreign or domestic
policy; such injurious thinking is in the way and clog's the rational thinking
needed to solve this debacle. The world is governed by force.
America, as we speak, is governed by our votes. Our vote has real force. If we
fail to vote for sovereign choices, we will be ruled by the scattershot foreign
malevolence that other nations will decide for us. Please devote yourself to the fundamentals
of our nation: one nation under God. America
is as only as good as our people vote. Our vote is only as good as our people
think. This test will prove gravely important.
Do you like your liberty? Then vote for it! What a great opportunity to
dismiss his pathetically dysfunctional world view and embrace the cogent world
view of Mitt Romney. Just go ahead and vote for four more years of this, think
how "historic" liberty would become, because it will be lost!
9/7/12
The quadrennial carnival, commonly known as the
Democratic national convention is over. Such was a great representation of the
Alinsky leftist coup d'état at the dog and pony show of the convention. President Barack Obama accepted his
party's nomination with a moribund and predictable speech that was a rerun of
other speeches from times past. He showed himself, in this speech, to be the same as he has been and will continue
to be, that is, a collectivist wealth redistributor, a man steeped in Marxism as
his driving ideology, a man bound and determined to subjugate the free market to
government dictates, suppress free speech and subdue the creation of capital. He
is a great orator and rhetorician who has never seen America as a beneficial force in the world.
Rather, his world view judges America as grievously exploitative of the world's
resources and indigenous peoples. He fancies himself as the fanciful "avenger in
chief" for colonialistic "sins". When, in reality, it is HE who is the commander
in THIEF. He has stolen the economic liberty of Americans yet to be born with
trillion dollar per year deficits that will be THEIR bill as taxpayers. He has,
through his policies of redistribution, stolen the capability of the labor force
to work and keep the fruits of THEIR labor. He and his party have consistently
made each and every day harder than the one before by enacting more and more
onerous retrograde regulations that squelch capital appreciation and its
attendant benefits.
Like any other failed president, Oblabla mostly
avoided his record of economic degradation; instead, he just blames others. It
is his way of "putting lipstick on a pig" to quote him. According to him, you
"still have a pig", lipstick or not. He was talking about Sarah Palin at the
time; seems that he has his own war on women going on. Just saying. His goal is
to enfeeble the economy, for in thereby doing so, he and his party become
stronger and would gain more control over the private sector by labor surpluses
(persistently high unemployment) and capital shortages (persistently high
deficits) and then present themselves as the one's who care about your plight by
offering more food stamps, housing vouchers, ebt card, wic checks, section eight
housing, etc, so as to have your useful dependency for the subsequent elections.
Keep you down and tell you that they know the way up. Meanwhile, he and
his ilk will demonize the engines of growth and prosperity and the ill reasoning
voter will follow the lead to their own demise.
It is very regrettable to see so
much time and effort expended by the democrats to portray wealth and prosperity
as something to be feared and loathed. According to their economics, they say
that they want good paying jobs-but just not "too" well paying. They want you to
have a nest egg-but not "too" big of one. Because, if you did, you would
automatically become portrayed as wealthy and evil. If one becomes wealthy to that point then
that wealth separates that individual from dependency on or need for government assistance. This is a matter of job security for them and it is how that they do
business. Speaker after speaker upbraided those whom have had financial success
in the private sector as robber barons and exploiters of the market place rather
than the edifying and sustaining force behind it. And they were cheered! The
audience was more than ok with it!
Is the
concept so hard to realize and so obscured by their envy blinded eyes that taxes
are on capital and wealth and not on people? Is it so hard to grasp that their
political leadership's policies are a mass of conflicting impulses that have
regulated and taxed American's prosperity into other countries? Outsourcing
anyone? They have only them selves to blame and not the previous president. It
was quite revealing and a hot episode of the theatre of the absurd to see the
gelatinous platform of the DNC as it played peek-a-boo with God, Jerusalem and
wayward delegates. Well at least, they found their real core values in time to
amend their platform. Wink-wink, nudge-nudge!
With
both conventions over, the campaigns will run at full speed until the November
elections. Everyone of us must do our part to make the case for liberty and
against collectivism. We must show the before and after policies and effects of
each because we can and have done far better as a nation. Issues such as energy independence, national sovereignty, immigration control,
restoring the vitality to the housing market, the relationship between tort
reform and medical insurance costs, reducing and ending the racial divisions
spawned by the rhetoric of the last three and a half years, reducing taxation and regulatory excesses, national
debt and monetary policy, border fortification and our language and culture are
paramount concerns The world is watching America very closely. Vote for
liberty!
8/30/12
The Republican national convention in Tampa Florida
was an opportunity fulfilled that showed
with boldness that America has a choice for the better on election day 2012. It
was the time to passionately represent the need to grow the economy, reinforce the
place for traditional family values and to advantageously prepare and position
America for a changing world. Time well spent.
Vision, courage and fortitude of
spirit and heart was found in the great array of speakers. Many were self made
antitypes of the "you didn't build that" psychosis that plagues the left. America has regressed in influence and in our
sense of national purpose with this current administration and his political
party. The longer a sports team loses the easier it is to accept loosing. So it
is with team Obama. It is time to embrace the winning ways of an opportunity
economy that will come with the Romney/Ryan ticket.
8/12/12
Since the American economy has been caused to perform at a near depressionary
level by the leftist and regulatory overlords, it can be seen here that the
selection of Wisconsin congressman Paul Ryan (R) by Republican presidential
nominee Mitt Romney was a good choice. Paul Ryan will correct these excesses. A federal budget has been prepared
by the Republican controlled House and
sent to the Senate, yet without the Senate taking it seriously. The
democratically controlled Senate dose not want to go on record by voting on that
budget, else that vote
become a campaign issue. Ah, priorities, well this farce is going to be exposed
with the addition of Paul Ryan to the Presidential ticket. The economy is being
deliberately suppressed and thereby being used by the democrats to grow
dependency on government social programs. This will be relentlessly pointed out
by congressman Ryan and he will show what needs to be done to fix the economy
and in doing so, clearly show the differences between Obamaism and capitalism.
His committee positions and excellent grasp of the budget numbers and his
capability to articulate it and make it understandable to the common man is
excellent. Go Romney-Ryan!!!
8/05/12
If our country is to correct course and begin the economic healing process,
it would do well to stop the bleeding figuratively brought about by the
socialism that so easily seduces and besets us. All the wealth that the "rich"
possess would not fund the current expenditures made by the federal government.
If all of their money is taken and it is all "fair" then it is on to the middle
class and the lower class, etc, etc. All economic activity is interrelated and
this is a false premise that the rich live like Scrooge McDuck and hide all
their money in ever expanding mattresses never allowing it to recirculate and
grow our tax base. The states that have elected conservative governors have
unemployment rates lower than the states with liberal governors. Wealth can be
taxed away or it can be allowed to grow. Vote accordingly.
7/21/12
How many times do we have to go down this road of individual accountability?
How many, many times do we as a nation, need the poisonous fruits of humanism to steer us
back to the fundamental rendition and recognition that we are to do unto others
as we would have them do unto ourselves? Judeo-Christian world view anyone? If
this is our integral, primordial morality, then no such shootings would EVER
occur. We must rehearse the matter, but in a different context, yet with the
same foundation, we see the same. Consider the earlier piece pertaining to the
Columbine school shootings...timeless principals of our humanity...he who has
ears to hear...
American School shootings and values neutral education-
the connection to and conflict with essential liberty
This is one of the most difficult topics on which to write an essay.
The grief and anguish for the slain is very hard to contemplate. It will never
leave those families who were savaged by those attacks. The parents will never
see their children again. On the morning of the shootings, unknowingly, the
parents saw their children for the last time. Can you imagine that empty
feeling? Pray and ask God to comfort them during this time of suffering and
great loss.
Some questions that arise out of these disasters have no answers. We will not
pretend that we have all the answers to this or any other tragedy. Evil exists.
Good exists. Sometimes, evil prevails.
When we analyze these events, some questions we think of are, "What caused
this?, and "What can we do to prevent this from happening again?" These
questions DO have answers. The reason this piece is written is to explore these
answers. The phrase that, "Those who don't learn from history, repeat it" is
quite true. Quotations are included from the founding fathers of American
government in the course of this essay to show that humanity has been here
before. The creators of the American constitution were people who met the
barbarians and realized that they are us, and therefore framed the constitution
and bill of rights around that painful reality in an attempt to check our sad
propensity for self destruction.
In questions of power, then, let no more be said of confidence in man, but bind
him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. --Thomas Jefferson
In our political world today, generally speaking, two types of governments
exist. With varying degrees of application, governments seek to keep societal
order and control. Totalitarian governments control their citizens thoughts,
words and deeds by externally forcing their people to obey the code of law. In
order to bring this about, many personal freedoms don't exist. The government
controls the media and speech of the people to such an extent so as to keep all
activities working for the good of the state. The state sees religious
activities as a threat to it's primacy and atheism is primarily taught.
Individual liberty is a threat to the unified good of the state. Dissent is a
crime and carries a harsh penalty.
No government is respectable which is not just. Without unspotted purity of
public faith, without sacred public principle, fidelity, and honor, no machinery
of laws, can give dignity to political society. --Daniel Webster
In democracies and constitutional republics, such as in America, the primary
method of societal control resides within the people themselves as they exercise
INTERNAL control. This mechanism of order is predicated upon a moral consensus
shared by the society at large. One's respect for their family name or the great
spiritual truths derived from religious traditions informs their inner self as
to what is just and lawful. The guidelines are written on their heart and minds
to the extent that external laws are not generally violated. The external laws
exist to formally detail the law that operates within the internally controlled
individuals. This respect for rule of law is primarily enforced from the inside
out. It might be added that some unjust external laws exist, however, most laws
are enablers of liberty and not it's inhibitor.
John Adams said, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending
with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was
made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the
government of any other. Oct. 11, 1798, Address to the military
"Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best stage,
is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one." --Thomas Paine,
Common Sense; 1776
Being willfully ignorant of that vital element for a free society, deliberately,
over the last thirty years, our government, through the public schools, has
sought to exclude the great religious teachings that have fostered the mechanism
of INTERNAL control. Prayer was eliminated from public schools and evolutionary
teaching took it's place. Students who were once were taught that they were
created in the image of God are now being taught they were nothing more than an
end result of random chance mutations. God is degradingly portrayed as a crutch
and man is the rule maker is now the teaching. Furthermore, the teachings of the
home were ridiculed as being backward and restrictive upon "freedom". The creed
of the schools became "If it feels good-do it". If evolution is true, they
reasoned, why not? This is the ethos of the supposed "values neutral education"
and it threatens to permeate every aspect of our culture.
God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be
thought secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the
minds of men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be
violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect
that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.
--Thomas Jefferson
In time, as these students became young adults, their college professors built
upon these teachings. Then when these college graduates entered the work force
they brought this world view with them into their professions. They now occupy
political office. They are the "credentialed" experts who promulgate the public
school curricula. They are judges and attorneys. Some are school teachers who now
teach these things to subsequent generations; the morally blind now lead the
morally blind.
Thomas Jefferson wrote,
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it
expects what never was and never will be."
What are some of the fruits of all this? Convenience killing for one. Abortion
is called freedom of choice. We see that without God anything is possible.
Without the INTERNALLY applied moral restraint humans are able to rationalize
any behavior. External laws don't avail. The high school shootings are a symptom
of the moral void created by failing to educate the "whole person". External
laws are interpreted as encumbrances to "freedom". These laws are "someone
else's morality". If it "is my body, my choice" in one area of life, why can't
it be the same in other areas of life as well? At least their logic is sound.
Good government generally begins in the family, and if the moral character of a
people once degenerate, their political
character must soon follow. --Elias Boudinot, president of the Continental
Congress
So what happens to our society? Well you can bet the political harlots will
seize upon the visual shock therapy provided by the shootings to make themselves
"relevant" and enact new laws that will diminish the freedom of the law abiding.
Dozens of laws were in place that made what was done in these shootings illegal,
yet they happened anyway. Why are people so mis-guided as to think that more
laws will change this? It will only change when the internal laws are allowed to
function within us as they must. As pointed out earlier, societal control must
happen, it is just a question of how.
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants. -William
Penn
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the
fatigue of supporting it. --Thomas Paine
The present government will play both sides against each other with these type
of tragedies with the end result being more citizens loosing their God given
freedoms as the state passes more and more laws. Freedom and "rights" originate
with nature's God and not with man. Man by his government systems can either
impede or promote "rights". The only way that (exclusively) external laws work
effectively is when personal freedom is lost. The enforcement of this system
requires a police state. We are heading in that direction unless the lawful move
against this process in a systemic manner. The present government is fearful of
our capacity for self protection. They will seek to use these tragedies as a
pretence to emasculate and disarm this country. Do we dare trust them?
No free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest reason for
the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a last resort to
protect themselves against tyranny in government. --Thomas Jefferson
"The basis of our Bill of Rights comes from the teachings we get from Exodus and
St. Matthew, from Isaiah and St. Paul. I don't think we emphasize that enough
these days. If we don't have a proper fundamental moral background, we will
finally end up with a government which does not believe in rights for anybody
except the State!"
Harry S. Truman, Thirty-Third President
The solution to these shooting and other on going tragedies is to return to and
apply the necessary moral teachings that brought this nation about and gave it
animation. The ACLU will cry foul, however, but James Madison wrote,
We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity
of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to
govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the
Ten Commandments of God. --James Madison, chief architect of the Constitution
These fundamentals of our nation's heritage are NOT being taught in the public
schools and this is not by accident. The goal of unregenerate man is to control.
Freedom is a fragile thing and it cannot be domesticated. Values neutral or
values clarification in education is dangerous. The fetish to avoid classifying
behavioral choices as right or wrong is one of the greatest disservices a
government can bring about to it's citizens. The really scary part is the
government KNOWS that our liberty is going to gradually be diminished and this
is part of the formula to bring it about. We the people, I am afraid, have
forgotten the price of freedom. However, we are finding out the cost of having
done so.
I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the
people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and
sudden usurpations. --James Madison
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety.
--Benjamin Franklin
Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and
vicious, they have more need of masters.
--Benjamin Franklin
We have clear choices before us this day. We can continue down the path of least
moral resistance with all it's glossary of obfuscation and grotesque deceit. We
can be emotionally coerced into bowing to the kings contrivance in order to see
ourselves as "open minded" and "tolerant" as we embrace varying forms of
deviancy and normalize this now proven retrograde proscription. We can live in
denial about this for only so long, however. These events will become more
common and will undoubtedly become worse. In many respects, what these school
shootings represent is the beginning of the end of freedom as we have known it.
We can also begin the process of reversing the deterioration we see before us
everyday. The advantages are profound. The solution is simple. We the people,
the ones who know better, despite being characterized as unsophisticated and
elementary, must move to vote away those with these world views. We must remove
from our school boards these destructive teachings and their adherents. These
shootings and other moral enormities are the result of their approach. This is
what they have brought us. The wisdom of the people who began this
constitutional republic and codified the natural rights of man within the
constitution and bill of rights have to be taught to every child. Our heritage
and our humanity will be stolen if we fail to decisively act. This time, without
pretence, we must "do it for the children".
Let us not fall in line with the rest of history, whose fate was described by
Alexander Hamilton when he wrote..."But if experience, in this instance,
verifies the lesson long taught by the enemies of liberty, that the bulk of
mankind are not fit to govern themselves; that they must have a master, and were
only made for the rein and the spur; we shall see the final triumph of despotism
over liberty; the advocates of the latter must acknowledge it to be an ignis
fatuus, and abandon the pursuit. With the greatest advantages for promoting it
that a people ever had, we shall have betrayed the cause of human nature.---A
letter from Hamilton to the citizens of New York containing remarks on Mentor's
reply, 1784
06/28/12
With the recent supreme court decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act, we
realize that history does indeed repeat itself. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote
the majority opinion to uphold the law. This was a incongruent and unlawful decision for an
appeals court judge to make. The function of the appeals process is either to
agree or disagree with the facts of the case and the arguments as set forth and
explain why. It is not the pervue of the court to write law or offer an
amplification of statutory authority that essentially serves to legislate from
the bench. In voting for the five to four decision, and thus upholding the law,
Judge Roberts didn't stay true to the role of an appeals court judge. He rendered
his decision upon HIS construct that the funding for the ACA was a tax and
should stand. President Obama's representative before the supreme court,
Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. vacillated between arguing for and
against the funding mechanism as a tax or a penalty fee. His arguments were
disjointed and illogical, yet Justice Roberts became the source for the
conclusion for the weak arguments that Virrilli tried to make. Allegorically,
Verrilli was playing solitaire with 51 cards and Roberts decided to give him the
last card to complete the deck. That is NOT a judge's responsibility or function.
That being said, what does this bill mean for the, at one time, "land of the
free and home of the brave"? We will be writing about this in the days to come.
This court's decision is a profoundly bad one for the cause of liberty and a
free people.
06/20/12
Let the facts speak for themselves regarding the American economy. There have
been declines in household net worth, mortgage foreclosures are or have been at
all time highs, unemployment is at a persistently high level not seen since the
great depression, GDP growth is feeble, etc, etc. This is a demonstrable pattern
that accelerated under the Obama administration. It began in 2007 when the
democrats became the majority party in both legislative houses. Consider the
facts and recognize the "before and after picture". The day the Democrats took
over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd 2007--the day the
Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very
start of the 110th Congress.
The Democrat Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time
since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.
For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that
everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:
January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the
Congress. At the time:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB
GROWTH!
Remember the day...
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial
Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the
economy?
--BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
Unemployment... to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION
Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
FIASCOES!
Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because
it was financially risky for the US economy.
And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA
And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
OBAMA and the Democrat Congress
So when someone tries to blame Bush...
REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007.... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!"
Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well
as 2010 &2011.
In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to
compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending
increases.
For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely,
passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama
could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to
complete the 2009 budgets.
And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very
Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the
omnibus bill as President to complete 2009.
If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the
Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth
straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took
control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.
If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself. In a nutshell, what
Obama is saying is, "I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to
expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th." WHY, WHY, WHY will any clear
thinking free citizen vote to allow these parasites to maintain any power in
office? Learn and discern and make your vote count in a way to stop this
madness.
06/03/12
The facts of history remind us that
when early American's fought their way free of the British crown and King George
III, they did so for the purpose of LIMITING government's role and place in
their lives. They did not fight the war of DEPENDENCE they fought the war of
INDEPENDENCE. The rejection of the stamp act and the Boston tea party were
actions taken over small
taxes when compared to the spider web of taxes contemporary Americans are forced
to pay. The property taxes we pay today, for example, would NEVER be accepted by
those that fought for freedom and started this country! It is a gross
misrepresentation of history and human nature to suggest that government is a
benign "problem solver".
In light of this, the U.S. Constitution
originally contained strong protections against unlimited taxes. An income tax,
as we have it today, was not permissible, and for many years scholars understood
that Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution granted to Congress only 18
specific powers such as the ability "to raise and support Armies." With the
addition of the 16th Amendment in 1913 the government (that trustworthy
institution) authorized an income tax without limitations.
The Supreme
Court in the 1930s enfeebled the doctrine of enumerated powers by ruling that
the government's spending power was "not limited by the direct grants of
legislative power found in the Constitution." (United States v. Butler,
297 U.S. 1, 56 S. Ct. 312, 80 L. Ed. 477) With the Constitution's original
tax limits traitorously removed, taxes were then made "legal" by our
"representative" government's "authority". The national taxpayers union created,
for purposes of illustration, Tax Freedom Day, to demonstrate the day of the
year when an individual theoretically stops paying their taxes and starts
working for themselves. This benchmark went from January 30 in 1913 to April 12
last year. Isn't it comforting to hear from those responsible for this that the
"rich" have to pay their "fair share"!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a brazen collection of
thieves who justify their tawdry existence by pitting "rich versus poor", the
haves versus the have-nots, etc, etc. Can't you see what is going on here. This
country now has a nearly insurmountable debt because of their power hungry
recklessness and the socialists have made generations to come financially liable
for their "compassion". Just remember all this when they say that they are
"fighting for you-the little guy".
04/17/12
The modern Democratic party is a party of obeisance to the secular world
view. To them, the State is the absolute and total authority. This party and all
who give it their allegiance, are fundamentalist believers in the doctrines of
humanism. Accordingly, they vote and pass laws that reflect this belief system.
The progression of their belief system into greater and greater control over the
lives of Americans is slow and steady. While this progression moves ahead, the
passage of time itself dulls awareness and basic reference points of the
American people as to just how far we have been moved away from the
Judeo-Christian world view that gave this nation it's foundation as expressed
through the declaration of independence and the constitution. Without the
guidance and understanding that American's rights come from their Creator and
instead erroneously believe that our rights come from our government, we then
become subjects of that government and are no longer citizens. When we as a
people have to even consider whether or not that the state, for "the greater
good" can compel us to purchase health insurance as a lawful condition of
citizenship and with it violate our religious faith, our government has failed
to uphold the constitution. It has failed to subordinate it's authority to the
authority of the constitution. However, in this election year, the secularists
are calculating that the birth control debate will be a sufficiently distracting
and divisive issue to divide the Republican's along the so called "socially
liberal/fiscally conservative" demographic. What they are doing is a
contemptuous disregard of individual rights, the authority of the constitution
and religious liberty. That is what the secular statist sees when they look at
the American citizen. They will deride and ridicule any who oppose their world
view, especially those who seek political office. Let us take a moment and mark
a point in time right now to remember and reflect upon the Judeo-Christian world
view that has been expressed by our political leaders from the past. Use these
quotes, learn them and tell others about them. It is our obligation to liberty.
John
Adams said, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending
with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was
made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the
government of any other. Oct. 11, 1798, Address to the military
God
who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought
secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the minds of
men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated
but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is
just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.
--Thomas Jefferson
Those
people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants. -William Penn
"The
basis of our Bill of Rights comes from the teachings we get from Exodus and St.
Matthew, from Isaiah and St. Paul. I don't think we emphasize that enough these
days. If we don't have a proper fundamental moral background, we will finally
end up with a government which does not believe in rights for anybody except the
State!"
Harry S. Truman, Thirty-Third President
We
have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of
mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern
ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten
Commandments of God. --James Madison, chief architect of the Constitution
I
believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people
by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden
usurpations. --James Madison
Only
a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious,
they have more need of masters.
--Benjamin Franklin
03/14/12
Don't be a loyalist to the crown! The authority of law from the foundational
document of the United States, the Constitution, is being explained away. The
language is simple..."Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . . When, under the pretence
of "the greater good" "the free exercise thereof is denied ANY LAW that does
this is unlawful. Health care is the latest example of lawlessness. Our rights
are first and preeminent over any construct or contrivance of the king. Remember
why this nation came into being and never loose that focus. Don't be a loyalist
to the crown!
01/09/12
With the new year comes a sense of new beginnings and resolution to better
one's life and circumstance. These thoughts must be predicated upon an informed
mind coupled with zeal to accomplish the goals of resolution. Individually, if
we move to remove the things in our life that are holding us back from
self-sufficiency and independence, then, we as a country will reach the same
goals on a national scale. It is by firm reliance upon God's Providence, his
wisdom in our lives and trust in his blessings that we will be successful and
once again regain the limited government that serves all of us the best. Let us
focus on these things everyday and call them to mind especially now as the New
Year begins. Again, Happy New Year!!
12/23/12
Time to contemplate much as the year ends and consider the years behind and
hopefully the years ahead in one's life. Faith is the bedrock of one's existence
whether realized or not. Think through the under girding of your life and what
gives us purpose and surely one's faith is measureable and valuable to this end.
That being said, consider the following small essay on one solitary life.
The winnowing process of selecting a candidate from the republican party to
oppose the sitting president, Barack Obama, is entering the primary election
phase. It is a beneficial process for that goal as long as the focus remains
chiefly upon why and how to defeat him. If a mature, prescient, informed and
thorough debate occurs then the process to victory will be fruitful. If, on the
contrary, name calling and immature ad hominine attacks supplant logical debate,
the goal will not be achieved.
With the seventieth anniversary of the bombing of
Pearl Harbor by the Japanese, we see again how hard fought it was for our
liberty to be preserved. America at that time was very ill-prepared to wage war
against the burgeoning war machine of the Japanese. The signs were there that
some such an attack was coming-we chose to ignore them. We as a nation didn't
want to involve ourselves in such costly entanglements that come with a foreign
war. That option of to get involved or not was removed by the events of December
seventh nineteen forty one. Let us take the time to honor and remember that day
and the cost to our fellow country men and women. Do your due diligence and
become aware of the nature of that event and how it changed our world. Honor
those who are still alive who were there and lived to tell the story. Finally,
honor them with the votes that you cast next year so
our liberty is defended and preserved. Don't be caught off guard like in the
case of Pearl Harbor. Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom...remember...
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for
good men to do nothing." -- Edmund Burke
The news of protesters marching in different cities across America is a
sign of complete manipulation of the thought processes of the protesters by
their puppet masters. The protesters have modern technology, food, clean
drinking water, clothing, foot wear, sleeping bags and the basic safety provided
them by the system that they decry as being "oppressive". They need to but look
at the world around them to see the abject folly of their own self deluded
discontent. The protesters spectacularly embody the term "useful idiots". The
protesters are very, very opposed to many, many things (almost Dr. Seuss like)
in their opposition. Green eggs and ham come to mind? They are not the
left's answer to the tea party as some in the big lib media say. They are
organized and paid for in some part by various progressive organizations and the
tea party was not. Their objectives are ill-defined and blurry at best. The
basis of the tea party was to give voice to their strong objection to a one
party ruling class (democrats) that governed without any meaningful
accountability to the producer class. The "occupy" protesters seem to want to
restructure our representative form of self governance into mob rule. The tea
party seeks a government that views it people as citizens and not subjects.
These are but some of the differences between the two groups. The "occupy
protesters" should be called the anti party. They are but chess pieces being
used to both stage and give higher profile to the hard leftist who lead them.
These protests are the precursors to more and greater public displays of
orchestrated discontent.
There are undoubtedly honest souls among the "occupy
protesters" who sincerely believe that they must be present in these marches to
call attention to a nation that they see as failing them and their hopes for a
better life. Agreed. But WHY is this nation failing them in their eyes? They
cite the usual roll call of leftist tripe as reasons for why they must be
present, waving weird signs and allowing themselves to become pungent in hygiene.
Wall street greed got their goat? Question for them is government greed more
dangerous or is Wall street greed more dangerous to them? The government prints
the money that is used as currency in this country-no corporation, stock broker,
hedge fund manager, brokerage house, etc does that. The same government that
prints this money also borrows money that it pays back with this inflated
currency by monetizing the debt that it created. This devalues the financial
state of nearly every person living in this country. Again, no corporation can
do that.
Let us pose arelevant question here, who did you vote for in the last election?
"Occupy protester", yes, answer that question, if you voted for Obama and the
Democrats, you voted for people who seek to render our national economy so weak
and debt ridden through their policies that your life and hope for a better life
will be so degraded that you, and subsequent generations will be their
indentured servants. This is done by design to create economic life boat
scenarios where choices and opportunities to live INDEPENDENTLY are gradually
eliminated. Your only hope for the basics of material living will come from some government program that
will make you DEPENDENT upon the government for your needs. March all that you
want but if you keep voting for Socialist/Marxists you have voted away your
chance for a better life. It's not Wall street doing this to you, it is you
doing it to yourself.
When vague emotional terms are the basis for voting for a
presidential candidate..."hope and change" anyone...and said
candidate's voting record was ignored or explained away by
those in the media and those who voted for him, then you
have voted to have the fox guard the hen house.
This president inherited what HE VOTED FOR as a U.S.
Senator-and wanted more than he inherited-as he now decries.
He and his socialist ilk employ an economic approach that
eventually dries up capital and causes high unemployment and
greater government dependency. It's NOT the president or a
PARTICULAR POLITICAL PARTY per se, IT IS THE PLAN NOT THE
MAN. It is preposterous to think that such socialistic plans
ever, ever work in a sustainable way. Oh sure, the
socialistic plan works for those in power and at the top of
the totem pole but other than the ruling elites the average
citizen suffers.
Corporations are sitting on cash because they live in fear
of what the socialists will do next. They are trying to
survive. The risk/reward of expanding their businesses is no
longer is their favor. It is basic survival mode for their
businesses. It is time
for Americans to make a choice that is informed by
consequences when they vote. If we vote for socialists then
we get what we have today. If you don't like the results
then don't continue to vote for it. If we vote for those who
seek to grow our economy through innovative free market
entrepreneurialism then investment capital will be put to
work and the economy (and employment opportunities) will
grow. Tax revenues will then increase because we will have more
tax payers. We now have a clear before and after picture
concerning what socialism does to a people and their economy.
Next election, choose liberty if you like liberty. Next
election, choose socialism if you don't like liberty. The
choice is clear. It is that simple. We are living through
one voting choice and it's destructive results. We can
do better and have done so in the past. It is up to everyone
of us. This is job number one. Choose liberty by voting for
liberty. Remember the words of Margret Thatcher, "The
problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of
other people's money".
Vote as you live. Don't cast your ballot as a nebulous fantasy by which you
take leave of your senses. If you look to save money on your household budget
(food, gas, etc.) then likewise vote for those candidates that won't tax and
regulate it away from you. Remember that your money is not theirs unless you
give it to them. More money to them is never, never enough. That America is in
the midst of record setting financial turmoil there is no doubt. The way out of
it is also not in doubt. As business is forced to downsize during tough economic
times so must government downsize. Remember, your vote can make your life easier
or more stressful and difficult, so use the same approach to voting as to the
everyday decisions you make because they are much the same in cause and effect.
Live as you vote.
To determine the value of the currency (fiat money) that each country uses,
an evaluation of the financial stability of that country must take place. It is
a basic process that occurs every moment of every day. Without such, the value
of that currency cannot be known. This rudimentary process is profound in it's
breath and scope as it pertains to every aspect of that particular country's
people living standards. The value of the currency is a proxy for the aggregate
work and capabilities of that nation's people. Election results, generally
speaking, can by their nature greatly influence the "value" of that nations
currency. In a representative republic, elections serve to place the elected in
a position of authority to represent the majoritarian will of the electors. When
the elected officials exercise their votes in legislation they can either
increase, keep stable or decrease the value of the currency. In America, the
financial state of affairs is no different in how her net worth in determined.
The three branches of government of the United States are subject to the will of
the electorate. The legislative branch originates the bills primarily through
the congress and then through reconciliation with the senate. Such legislation
then is presented to the president for acceptance or veto. In all of this, the
office holders are supposedly carrying out the majority will of the electorate.
However, it can be seen that a people can vote themselves in captivity or liberty.
Liberty and captivity are in the eye of the beholder in the world today. This is
no joke, for ignorance and superstition are catastrophic when they guide the
mind and will of the electorate. This is where we are as Americans today. Peter
has been robbed to get Paul's vote and now Peter is going bankrupt. Unscrupulous
politicians have framed the issue to the place where Peter is the villain, Paul
is the victim and the politician is the vindicator. This is a economic model for
bankruptcy and degradation of a republic. Until this process is corrected by
wisdom in the voting booth born from clear thinking, the state of America will
continue to deteriorate. It is the epitome of what is meant by the term "useful
idiot". Ostensibly free people voting themselves into bondage because they can't
think straight. Most of these people live their lives in a skilled and wise
pattern but when they enter the voting booth they have the reasoning power of a
two year old. They live the role that lazy voting brings them and then complain
about the results. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. We cannot be
ignorant and free. Just look up Thomas Jefferson for more on this. That is,
unless you like being captive.
"Halt, who goes there"? The American experiment in self-determination as a
nation is an ongoing manifestation of individualism manifested in aggregate
choices. Contradictory? Not so when viewed as in the context of a Republic,
evidenced by the individual choices to be represented by our elected
representatives. Who we are as a nation is found as who we are as individuals.
As a people, were are directed by the moral consciousness inherent in our
operative world view. That is predicated upon self identity and self awareness.
The self government we espouse cannot be realized by raw collectivism. That is
contradictory. Else, we lose our directive of limited self-rule. We define
ourselves, as a nation, by what we allow as individuals. "Halt, who goes there"?
Every election fills in the blanks to this question. Every election defines this
answer. The rest of the world longs to answer the question we can only answer
for ourselves. That is not their place. No other nation is as close to this as
we are. This is unique and very rare in human history. Collectivism is at
variance to self determination and a representative Republic. We must always as
ourselves, therefore, "Halt, who goes there"?
May God hear our prayers for the victims of the Arizona shootings. They are
deserving of all of our compassion and God's healing hand. God gave the shooter
free will and he chose to use it for evil. May justice be served in his case.
The leftists in our midst have figured out a way to make this horrible situation
even worse. They are doing it by politicizing this tragedy. Did we expect them
not to...did we expect them to have any other priority? Lets look at their words
with a few examples to see how hateful and inciting to violence that their words
are...George J. Mitchell the former senator from the state of Maine said "cities
could burn this summer" when the Republicans were proposing welfare reform in
1995. The actor, Alec Baldwin chimes in with his warm and fuzzy thoughts
regarding then congressman Henry Hyde. When he appeared on the comedy show
Late Night with Conan O'Brian on December 12, 1998, eight days before
President Clinton was to be impeached, Baldwin said, "if we were in another
country... we would stone Henry Hyde to death and we would go to their homes and
kill their wives and their children. We would kill their families, for what
they're doing to this country." Where was the call by the left for the
repudiation of these remarks? They have selective outrage and lie about
conservatives being perpetrators of violence while ignoring the hate mongers on
their side. Pray for them to be honest with themselves and remove politics from
the sad events regarding the Arizona massacre.
Now the governing begins. Objectives are to be pursued. The U.S. house of
representatives is now composed by a majority of conservatives. The context is
still the same, that is, that the main stream media and their world view of the
government, when under the control of conservatives is a very bad thing. When
the socialists are in the majority control of the government then government
becomes a very good thing to them. Most in the media have not been disabused of
the folly of socialism (in denial) and therefore will also be pursuing their
objectives to undermine and force from power the conservatives. This effort will
be extremely challenging for the left this time because they cannot so easily
control the message and shape "the truth" as they have in the past. The reason
for this is that the reality of persistently high unemployment, record
foreclosures, the nationalization and destruction of the healthcare system and
record debt is so strong that the media and it's pro socialist, pro democrat
efforts won't be able to hide these realities. The contrast between their words
and the realities Americans face everyday won't allow it. For the conservatives
in power, a clear before and after picture must be presented in stark, clear and
unambiguous terms so that their solutions will be embraced and that they will be
encouraged to "fight the good fight" against the socialists in our government.
This is to be won, one day at a time until the end of time. Time is short as
always, so let them, with haste move liberty foreword and socialism backward.
The failures of the Democrats at the polls were predictable. Their promises
were as usual predicated upon the mythology of socialism. Wealth was
redistributed and in doing so it was diminished in value. "Why work when they
are taking from me, why work when they are giving to me" this is what their
policies have brought America. They have devalued, diminished and destroyed the
lives of so many with their policies. They got into office by lying and now they
are trying to regain any semblance of a political foothold by lying again. The
democrats are saying that the reason they lost is because they failed to
communicate effectively. No, the reason they lost is because they were heard
LOUD and CLEAR. The American people saw and heard that their liberties were
being jeopardized by a small group of collectivist and voted them out of
political office. It is as simple as that. The Democrats showed their true
nature. It was not ambiguous, it was clearly communicated what their intent was.
Now the rebuilding process begins. The conservatives need to act with total
resolve and undaunted purpose as they seek to rescue and restore individual
liberty for those that have been aggrieved by these political robber barons.
This will not be easy or smooth. It will be mischaracterized by the leftist
media. It will be portrayed as a scheme to enrich the wealthy. Any misstep or
slip up by the Republicans will be distorted so as to make them look like they
are incompetent. We have seen this before. However, this time the more the left
in the media do this the more it will motivate and energize the right. Liberty
is our to keep and the mid-term elections of 2010 is a great place to renew that
responsibility.
The election of 2010 is part of the ongoing struggle that the citizens
of the United States have engaged in since this country began. This struggle has
primarily been to overcome the enemies of liberty both foreign and domestic.
However, this election has the main component of voting out of power the enemies
of liberty. Why? Because those whom have supposedly been elected to help the
citizenry remain a free people have voted against our liberty. It has become
crystal clear through the legislation that they have enacted that some office
holders objectives are at complete variance with the majority of Americans. They
don't represent our will. They reject the preponderance of polls that show the
majority of Americans DON'T want to go socialist. What is the most troubling in
this development is that the socialists are looking long term and seeing the
projected loss in 2010 as a mere temporary setback. This is troubling because
they are going to be patient with this initial rejection of their socialistic
agenda and when the political pendulum swings back in their direction, they will
continue to build upon the foundation that they have built in the last two
years. This election is of paramount importance and will carry great
implications for the 2012 election. It is not the terminal blow to the
socialization of America as some may hold. Question...is it the end of the
beginning of this blatant and raw socialism as advocated by the current
democratic party? Is it the beginning of the end of our constitutional republic?
Whoever is victorious in 2010, their primary directive needs to be the complete
repeal of any and all vestiges of this socialist foundation. It must be plucked
by the root and never have chance to grow again. Lets look at a before and
after picture.... In two years our national debt has nearly quadrupled, our
unemployment rate has surged to over 10%, the foreclosures on homes are at
record highs, our healthcare system has been nationalized, some of our major
industries have been taken over by the government, a "stimulus plan" has done
virtually nothing (other than explode the debt, and those that brought us this
enormity have the shameless gall to seek reelection. Therefore, whenever
any liberal or otherwise conditioned political commentator asks what the tea
party means when it says that we want to "take our country back" they can refer
to the before and after picture. If we are asked, "do to you want to go back to
the policies of the past", the answer is you bet I do. May all vote for liberty
in 2010! Pray for our nation.
An illegal immigrant enters our country ILLEGALLY and thereby resides
in it in violation of the law, that is why they are correctly classified as
ILLEGAL. The enforcement of these laws should be axiomatic. Predominantly, in
the United States, the illegal immigrants originate from Mexico and Central
America. This is a simple statistical observation without prejudice or passion.
Why is it so controversial to enforce such duly legislated laws? The nature of
the objection to such enforcement of these simple laws emanates from the
potential political viability of converting these illegal immigrants into votes
for the ruling class, power hungry left. The cheap labor provided by this group
of people also serves to cause some on the right to "look the other way" in
enforcing these laws. Through this process of laws left unenforced, those who
pay the tab for the illegal's presence have become disenfranchised with this
whole progression. Remember it is "we the people" and not "we the undocumented".
Gimme shelter...from the Marxists. Is it just a shout away? We must stand
strong in the storm of this left's choosing. We are NOT going to fade away. Just
say no to this passing tyranny. Today's point of purchase politics has settled
the matter or has it? On 3/20/2010, BE there and shout..." Hell no we won't go!
Hell no we won't go! Hell no we won't go!" REJECT the Obama gulag (IRS enforced)
of the compelled healthcare segregated-reservation. Reject the contrived radical
abuse of the leftist. The Mafioso in chief is looking for protection
money...that he prints. RESIST, REJECT and RESURRECT the liberty and ethos that
made this country THE world leader. Manifest destiny is blind and has no
boundaries. To quote P.J. O'Rourke "The three branches of government are NOT
money, bullsh&t and television. They are the executive, legislative and
judiciary. It is laws constructed and passed and (VOTED ON) by the
constitutional process. We will NOT go quietly into this third world night. GO
to the west side of the Capital building and compel and give all voice, prayer
and the sheer will of your human substance to all peaceful resistance
against the subjugation of our constitutional self-government to the Alinsky
leftist coup d'état. No more. Not here. Not now. Not
never!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Let's "solve" the current problems at the U.S. postal service by using the
proposed Obamacare business plan. An analogy needs to be made. The financial
problems at the postal service are recurring and growing worse. The financial
problems with the United States healthcare system are recurring and growing
worse. What needs to be done to solve or mitigate these situations? Transposing
the template of the left in the health care debate onto the postal service we
would:
(1) Make villains out of every private carrier (UPS, Fedex, etc) as being
"excessive" profiteers and greedy and in the pocket of the Republicans
(2) Tax and regulate them to the point that their profit margins greatly
diminish and they, in order to stay in business, raise their rates to excessive
levels
(3) Undercut their now sky high rates with a government subsidized "single
shipper" carrier solution that will ultimately force the private carriers out of
business.
See how easy that was! All the government has to do to solve the problems it
created is lie about the role they play in destroying the market place for
healthcare and the postal service. Follow that up with pinning the blame on the
private sector and portray themselves as compassionate vindicators of the
victimized. Finally, if anyone figures this out, label them as "unpatriotic",
unsympathetic, selfish rightwing kooks. Also, any news organization that exposes
their schemes will be deemed a "tool" of the fringe right wing. You see,
"single shipper" and "single payer" really have a lot in common. What can brown
do for you?
Happy New Year!!...as the saying goes. Indeed Happy New year to us all! The
nature of liberty is unchanged in any setting, New Year or old. Is there a
difference, is there a new setting, is there a "change" really worth noting? Not
necessarily. We embark on the same eternal playing field, the same
objective and the same stakes of victory or defeat. THE objective is not shared
by the governed and the governors. We are to rule over our "rulers" and they are
NOT to rule over the supposed ruled. History unquestionably and without dilution
or equivocation shouts that out and only through limited government that is held in check
by the constitution is individual liberty provided through SELF GOVERNANCE. In
this year we will witness the utter failure of a death spiral, that is the Keynesian, money
pumping, net worth devaluing "Bogarts" who smoke the weed of self
aggrandizing delusion. In
no part will the guise of collectivism bridge the gap of lies well told and the
reality of buyers remorse for "hope" and redistributed change.
The main elements of that struggle will
never change. Specifically, the congenital clash between those who seek personal
freedom and those plotting tyranny. Only the venues and the particulars of it's
expression change. The Trojan horse of history is today's creeping socialist
utopia. Fascists, as we should know, take control of the means of production.
Doesn't this remind us of the aims of the EPA and Al Gore? Medieval feudalism
isn't dead. It is reincarnated in broad generalized grants of unaccountable
authority given, without our voice, to governmental agencies. Today's
progressive and confiscator taxation calls for a correlative emancipation
proclamation. Through political superficiality this country is unwittingly
voting itself into bondage. Theses self imposed shackles are coming off in the
mid-term elections!
Here is a brief primer on how an erstwhile free people lose their liberty.
The free market is composed of a buyer and a seller. It operates voluntarily. It
serves to render mutually beneficial results between the buyer and seller.
Classic competition works to establish a market price. Choices made between the
buyer and seller empower both and allow others involved indirectly to benefit as
well. This arrangement isn't dependent on government per se. However, corrupt
governments are threatened by such self determination. Government is not
relevant in such a model. Therefore, that disdainful form of government
surreptitiously devises encumbrances to the free market to gradually enfeeble
it. Over time and with multiple regulations, taxes and minimizing basic
competition, etc, the corrupt government achieves its goal of eroding the
efficiency of the basic market system and thereby opens the door up for it to
take control of the buyer and the seller. The government will then, after
causing the collapse of an industry or company, inform the public that "the free
market can't function without our direct oversight and control".
Apply this model to the domestic automobile companies, banking system and now
the health care insurance providers.
It is amazing how a bankrupt government is to be believed that it has the
capability to "fix" the problems it purposefully created by so many, many useful
idiots. These useful idiots are primarily democrats whose blind allegiance to
big government is astonishingly sad! This country is at the crossroads of
life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness vs. life lived for the state,
liberty to only obey the state and the pursuit of serfdom. We are being
dispossessed of our property to pay for a government leviathan that will use our
own money to enslave us and our offspring. This must end. We must start singing
"we shall overcome" as those who were oppressed and discriminated against for
their race, for we are being discriminated against for our love of liberty.
Consider the following...
"I am inviolably attached to the essential rights of
mankind, and the true interests of society. I consider liberty in a genuine
unadulterated sense, as the greatest terrestrial blessing. I am convinced that
the whole human race is entitled to it, and that it can be wrested from no part
of them, without the blackest and most aggravated guilt." These words
appeared in Alexander Hamilton's response to the "Westchester Farmer"
which had advocated a more "responsible" position of remaining loyal
to the British crown and all it's benevolent over-lording of the colonies.
Americans pay more attention to beach erosion that the erosion of the ethical
and equitable administration of our "promised" constitutionally based
representative government. Many people have replaced the causes and effects for
what constitutes the mechanics of sound government with a compulsive system that
exists to serve their every need. The existence and acceptance of such an
arrangement inevitably leads to the deprivation of freedom of the governed. I
quote from the declaration of independence, "But when a long Train of
Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces (gives
evidence of) a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their
Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards
for their future Security. IT IS TIME TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT and
throw these captors from office in the next election! But, then again, we have
to deal with this..............
Bigots on the bench? The nature of the judicial branch is strict
impartiality-not partiality-else it ceases to be judicial and becomes
PREJUDICIAL! No juror is deemed suitable for the role of a jurist if, through
the Voir dire process, is found to be ineligible through bias, prejudice
or passion as per the pending case at hand. Similarly, judges have the strict
responsibility to recues themselves from cases when their role as judge will be
influenced by their inability to judge impartially. This is fundamental and
basic common sense in all areas of our legal system. Obama's selection of
Sonia Sotomayor
to
appointment to the Supreme Court disregards all of this. Remember, "As a man
thinks, so is he" (Proverbs 23:7) Deeds, not words, show what thoughts animate
this whole sorry process.
We live in a age of profound access to voluminous information. The computers
we now take for granted are portals into the accumulated experiences and
collective knowledge of mankind. However, some of our understanding used to
produce our current world view is regrettably swayed by old fashioned
propaganda and raw superstition. Current events regarding the "global warming"
credo are a prime example of such. The premise that man made pollution of
earth's atmosphere (anthropogenic) is causing an increase in world wide
temperatures is accepted as fact as the prevailing orthodoxy of "those that
care" about our planet. Conversely, those who disagree and seek to present a
differing viewpoint are categorized and labeled as "out of touch" and being
tools and greedy fools for big business. We all have a right to our opinions but
we DON'T have a right to "our" own facts. The high profile Al Gore and his
crusade to "save the planet" is an affront to those of us who want the facts
about this issue without the hype. He and his ilk are supported by the dominate
media and his motives are held to be altruistic and unquestionably pure. This
amalgam of propagandists refuse to allow full and fair debate and basic open
inquiry into the scientific proof they use to back their assertions. Simply put,
"why won't Al Gore debate this issue". If it is of such dramatic and critical
importance one would suppose that he would welcome any and all who "don't see
the light" he supposedly is trying to shine on the ecological "errors" of our
industrialized way. He is hiding behind smoke and mirrors and he knows it. He
has become a very wealthy man by championing this "king's contrivance" that will
reduce our liberty, prosperity and independence. Let us consider the source when
we look at Mr. Gore and his lack of intellectual honesty guided by his greed of
dishonest gain and the fraud that he espouses. Please explore these links and
draw your own conclusions.
The left is fighting an up-hill,
against the grain, swimming upstream
battle to lie, cheat and steal their way
to successfully teach/brainwash people
into believing that their
"natural" liberty inclinations are wrong
and that only government has the
answers.
Conservatism
comes naturally, conversely, liberalism
requires operant conditioning of thought
and ongoing negative reinforcement to
enslave an erstwhile free people. That
is one reason the left fights so very
hard to retain control of the public
school system.
The AIG issue reinforces their
mind control that was started way
back in grade school, to wit, that "big
business" is big because it is
corrupt and deprives the individual of
opportunities to be truly free. However,
there is no "bigger big" than "big
brother' a.k.a. Uncle Sam!!!
The main problems with such
propaganda/public
show trials (IE: AIG) is that it
is arbitrary, illegal
http://www.heritage.org/Research/LegalIssues/wm2356.cfm and politically
self-serving. Question is, who or what
group is next? No law was broken with
their bonus payments. Yet the liberals
want to feed the mindset that they
created for political gain. The door has
been opened for them to vilify ANY ONE
or ANY GROUP of people. Such is
prohibited by the Constitution and
corroborated by the ensuing relevant
case law.
Obama knows what he is doing. Don't doubt that for a second. He wants to
weaken the individual and strengthen the state. The net worth of the
individual has declined vis-à-vis equity and real estate values. This creates
more dependency upon government. Unemployment has risen and continues to
rise. Jobs are hard to come by and will become harder to find. This creates
more dependency upon government. Free speech and dissent are being oppressed
and those who speak out against Obama are being labeled as fringe and partisan.
Without opposition to Obama's socialism he will be more free to create even more
dependency upon government. There will be other areas explored relevant to the
primary directive of Obama and the socialists however, for the time being, this
is some food for thought and clear evidence that Obama is achieving his goals
and that he knows what he is doing.
Today we will hold up a dollar before a light source to see if it has any
inherent value. Take a look, it is a well constructed piece of paper but other
than that, in and of itself, it is a really good book mark. A specific book mark
at that, a book mark pegged to the value of a nation's cumulative worth as
derived from a real or perceived net worth. It is a relative valuation compared
with other proxies of national net worth vis-à-vis the peso, euro, etc.
Everyday, obviously, all of these change, in a great state of flux, subject to
what way the "leaders" decisions move that worth. All of these are subject to
many factors outside of their control-earthquakes, strikes, etc, and national
purpose. Enter words vs. deeds and specifically, the grossly misnamed "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009". George Orwell would
be proud of such blatant doublespeak. Why? Because a nation's (Federal/National
government) leadership cannot honorably "reinvest" the theft of a future
generations "proxy of worth" to solve today's deficiencies. The liberal well is
running dry. Soon words won't matter-but that's all the socialists ever "had" to
begin with.
Observe the operant nature of the deception of the democratic party as the
bailout currency valuation of "The Word of Obama" deflates. Book, chapter and
verse these deceivers owe a debt on their campaign promises as their reality
checks bounce in the "depression" of our liberty. They are bankrupt of
truth and borrowing on their "political capital" to lead America out of the
recession that they created. Brother-can you spare a dime?
Happy New Year! Each trip around the sun is noted by this phrase by most of
the inhabited world. We hope for the best and yet brace for the worst as we mark
our mortality and place in time. May we all recognize the fragility and
ephemeral nature of our situation with the divine truth we so soon forget, may
we take it with us and incorporate it into our frame of reference for the new
year; when times are good and when times are not so good. From scripture...
So teach [us] to number our days,
that we may apply [our] hearts unto wisdom.
Learn, watch, give, revive the good, deny the evil and may all of us prosper
and flourish with what we have and who we REALLY are. Happy New Year!!!
It is very instructive to observe how a government responds to difficult
situations confronting the governed. How it responds shows how it views the
people it represents. It's motives are revealed. Such is the case with gun
control, crime, property rights, taxes, etc and now the mortgage crisis.
In 1995 hard political pressure was brought to
bear upon lending institutions to issue credit to
minorities. Nothing is wrong with wanting to help
those get a leg up in the world who faithfully
desire to get started in private real estate
ownership. However, "civil rights" activists and
their groups saw fit to portray lending practices as
"racist and unfair to minorities". That is the
premise that they create and all bow down to it and
as a result credit was unduly issued to the
non-credit worthy.
Under duress, the powers that be passed
legislation that called on banks to be required to
lend to non credit worthy borrowers. Such laws,
including the Community Reinvestment Act, the CRA,
required two large quasi-government sponsored enterprises,
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to purchase lower
quality mortgages from the banks, insure them, and
then sell them to the public. Then these investment
products were grouped
into aggregates of subprime mortgages and sold
worldwide.
These were hot investment vehicles at the time
(housing boom). Private investors went to banks and
bought their subprime loans, packaged them, and sold
them as Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
worldwide.
(CMOs) Collateralized Mortgage Obligations were designed so that buyers could have a
higher probability that they would be repaid. The
design was flawed as we now see.
CMOs were sold short and the market crash began.
This short selling overwhelmed the mortgage and
banking system to where the current "bailout" was
required. Imagine that...our government at work in
places it has no business being.
In summation, bad loans equal bad results. Common
sense lost out to common politics and greed.
Yet,
please notice how a functioning private sector
arrangement and business relationship has been
turned into a tool of the left to advance their
agenda of greater government control and basic
infiltration of our liberty. The government caused
the problem and now they reap the rewards as they
"fix it". The useful idiots that voted for Clinton
are the culprits. The government just gives them
voice and power.
With this election of 2008, in America, past is prologue. We are witnessing
the endless cycles of deceit and delusion followed by walking on the nails of
liberal consequences. Except this walk is crippling until we decide to re-heal
ourselves. Oblabla has two years and his subjugation of liberty will be gone.
Even those that voted for him will reject him in due time. This declaration of
dependence comes with a high price. He brings class envy, prejudice, division,
mindless humanism, the boorish negation of free speech, forced allegiance to the
state, oppression of financial ambition, among other things to bear on a free
people...but only for a time. The nature of a people will and will always be
determined by why and what we allow. Make no mistake, liberty is NEVER
completely secure and can only be temporarily secured by an informed electorate.
America, it is time for the school of hard knocks. Oblabla is the best thing
that ever happened to the Republican party. Let's trade
the misery index
for the fairness doctrine. Go Oblabla!!!
On November fourth we will vote as a country for those who will represent our
political interests: candidates vs. candidates, or so it seems. What we need to
be about on election day is voting for ourselves. To wit, voting for the
governing power to remain under our control. We must vote vis-à-vis for
ourselves! This is our place and inherited duty.
Can a self-absorbed, childish, in fecund, retarded imbecile call the play for
a "better" tomorrow as per another country is concerned? We thinks not. Consider
one Hugo Chavez. Commie go home! Communism only "works" for the
administrators of it. Thanks Hugo for being such a crass elitist class bozo and
asking us to vote for Obama. Obama and Hugo. Biden is more fun? You are such a
man of the people...you and your ruling class people...the wonder of you Hugo.
What if we stopped working...all of us...for a long, long time...nothing would
be worth anything...capitalist or socialist or communist...now that is our kind
of constitution. Oil won't be worth a dime when we SHUT DOWN. Man to man, you
are a worthless piece of sh*t.
It has come to this. This insults the term "being dumbed down". Senator, and
vice presidential candidate, Joe Biden (D) of Delaware has a ruling class
vernacular and speaks from a dictionary with definitions framed by professional
leach-class politicians. Consider how he defines patriotism from the following
quote from a recent interview...
"We want to take money and put it back in the pocket
of middle-class people," Biden said in an interview on
ABC's "Good Morning America."
Noting that
wealthier Americans would indeed pay more, Biden said:
"It's time to be patriotic ... time to jump in, time to
be part of the deal, time to help get America out of the
rut."
Patriotism is patriotism. Class warfare is class
warfare. It is also a tool of the divide and conquer,
politically ambitious prostitutes of the left.
He "wants to take money"..."take
money"...say it again and again...he wants to TAKE
money!!! Outrageous but par for the course
because his ilk thinks it is THEIR money.
This is not patriotism this is theft. Patriotism
is shown in the speeches from Patrick Henry and not Joe
Biden.
The rut we are in is because of the liberal's socialism
that purposefully inhibits the success of those who work hard to make
their dreams come true. Biden/Obama define wealth as $250,000
per year-why that number Joe? Lets add more to those who
are "part of the deal" and say $100,000 or $80,000, etc.
We might want to "take" their money and expand the
number of "patriots" out there, right Jerky Joe. Biden
is such a hack professional politician that he won't or
can't see or admit to the dynamics of our economy that
those who make $250,000 often run small businesses and
often employ the middle-class. In doing so, these
"wealthy" Americans enable the middle class to put money
in their OWN pockets-without the "help" of the liberals
like Joe and Senator Oblabla. Consider this quote
for a frame of reference, from James Madison,
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger
on that article of the Constitution
which granted a right to Congress of expending,
on the objects of benevolence,
the money of their constituents."
Also, as if we needed any more proof that the liberal
media is in the tank for the democrats, consider this
editorializing from this Associated press article...
By DOUGLASS K. DANIEL, Associated Press Writer
McCain released a television ad
Thursday charging that Obama
would increase the size of the
federal government amid an
economic crisis. Contending that
"a
big government casts a
big shadow on us all," the ad
features the image of a shadow
slowly covering a sleeping baby
as a narrator misstates
the reach of the Obama tax
proposal. Wow, "misstates",
MISSTATES!? How does that work
for you? If McCain and Obama are
still in a dead heat even after
this sort of advocacy journalism
it has to show that
Sen.Oblabla is but an empty suit
and it shows more and more
everyday.
Some glass ceilings are not as equal as others. Consider Sarah Palin's
treatment in the American media. So very damn sexist-shame on you all!
Also consider, if one is a liberal politician then that ceiling is
useful, propagated and simultaneously benefitted from while being decried. If
one is a conservative that barrier is identified as a problem, fixed and
progressed away from. Conservatives solve problems-liberals keep them for
political usefulness.
Liberals can't politically afford to let this "issue" go away or be
mitigated by a conservative woman who has made the way to the top of the
political food chain. Palin disproves them and they know it. When the definition
of what JFK spoke of when he asked..."And
so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you
can do for your country"
is shown to be manifest in deeds and works we see
Sarah Palin. Conversely, Obama will speak his way against deeds and bring
futility to fruition. This is the pivotal difference between the Obama ticket
and the McCain ticket. To the liberals...lead with deeds...and use words
when you can't...the world is watching your deeds.
The Obamathon is such a force fed phenomenon. He is the "emperors clothes"
personified. Do we dare tell the naked truth about an empty suit? Bad ideas
expressed wonderfully are simply wonderfully bad ideas nonetheless. His "European
calling" reveals just how strong a socialist he really is. Patrick Henry spoke
of hope, as does Sen. Oblabla. His hope in hope rendered a frame of reference
lost on the Obama kool-aide drinkers, specifically this, that words mean NOTHING
without corroborating DEEDS. Henry showed everyone that false hope, no matter
how strongly believed, is vanity. Read his words that corresponded to his
deeds...and thus judge the hopeful illusion that is Barak Obama. Hope cannot
open the doors that reality has shut on socialism.
Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death
Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.
No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as
well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just
addressed the House. But different men often see the same
subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not
be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as
I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall
speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no
time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful
moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as
nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in
proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the
freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope
to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which
we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions
at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should
consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of
an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I
revere above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the
illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a
painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she
transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged
in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to
be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having
ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their
temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it
may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the
worst, and to provide for it.
I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is
the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the
future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know
what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for
the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen
have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that
insidious smile with which our petition has been lately
received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet.
Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves
how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those
warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land.
Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and
reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be
reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love?
Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of
war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I
ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its
purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign
any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy,
in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation
of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for
us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind
and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have
been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall
we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten
years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing.
We have held the subject up in every light of which it is
capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to
entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which
have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir,
deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be
done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have
petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have
prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its
interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and
Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances
have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications
have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt,
from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we
indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There
is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free--
if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges
for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely
to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long
engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon
until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we
must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms
and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!
They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so
formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it
be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are
totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in
every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and
inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by
lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of
hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir,
we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the
God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people,
armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as
that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our
enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our
battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the
destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our
battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it
is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have
no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too
late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in
submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking
may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable--and
let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may
cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually
begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to
our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already
in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen
wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet,
as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid
it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as
for me, give me liberty or give me death!
The United States Department
of the treasury is responsible for preventing counterfeit money from
entering the U.S. money supply. This is part of their official mission statement.
From their web site we read..."Although the counterfeiting of money was
substantially suppressed after the establishment of the Secret Service, this
crime still represents a potential danger to the Nation's economy." It is
understood that without specific measures taken to safeguard the value of our
national currency the American economy could potentially suffer undue hardship and be
subjected to a perverted manipulation of that proxy of national worth that is
the U.S. dollar. This is basic common sense and is one of the main stewardship
functions of our representative government. Counterfeit currency can and will
dilute the worth of legal currency. The overall money supply is at risk because
of the threat posed by counterfeit money.
The monetary policy
of the Federal Reserve aside, as a nation, it is imperative that we protect
the value of our currency. Quite similarly, our labor force is to be protected
from the diluting effects of "counterfeit labor" also referred to as illegal
aliens. For when such a major infusion of labor floods our economy with laborers
willing to work well below the par of prevailing wages, the entire work force
value is degraded and suffers the dilutive effect of their presence. In world
markets, the dollar is constantly being valued, compared and evaluated against
the other currencies. Our standard of living is derived from our own net worth
as referenced and reflected in the value of the U. S. dollar. Therefore, as with
counterfeit currency, counterfeit labor can and will dilute the worth of legal
labor. One follows the other. The question we ask is why does the U.S. Treasury
vigilantly enforce laws to eliminate counterfeit currency while "sanctuary
cities" exist in the United States? Why are there two standards regarding
U.S. economic security respective to our currency and workforce? "Sanctuary
cities" aid and abet lawlessness. If enough people decided to manufacture
counterfeit currency in the name of opportunity and inclusiveness, would
consistency prevail and counterfeit printing locations be classified as
sanctuary enterprises? If not, why not? We don't advocate ANY illegal
undertakings, yet we are compelled to point out such blindness and lawless
inconsistency. If illegal labor does jobs most American's won't do, so does
counterfeit money. A free America must rid itself of both.
Enter the era of point of purchase politics. With a fond dismissal of the
morning after, all is well with the Obama church. Hillary is wiccan bound with
her eyes on the prize while losing the view. McCain is serving his vendetta in
overmatched territory behind enemy lines. Two years and congress is newly old
and the dye is cast from south of the border. Third party is named chaos. Vote
accordingly.
Ceremonial salutations to the great land of liberty called America. Happy
2008!! Humanity changes not from year to year, yet the calendar does and so we
take note. America has changed much in the last four years. This new year will
be full of sound and fury as this quadrennial election manifests that change.
From the advent of the retirement of the baby boomers and that economic impact
to immigration law, this election will proxy the will of the people to the
extent that elections will allow. National sovereignty, the Almighty GOD, rule
of law, national purpose and basic enforcement of law will be voted on vis-à-vis
those running for office. Remember, government at best is a necessary
evil-choose your poison carefully! Pray much, think clearly and choose wisely.
Yes, it has been a long time; so much in the world to comment upon and so
little time to do so. A recent article in
the news
has prompted this response. What passes for garden variety "environmentalism"
today is a tool of oppression against liberty; given that the consistent theme
brought to bear against man is that man himself is the greatest problem in the
world he inhabits. When we have eco-crisis profiteers decrying and defining
individualism as the basis for the maiming of our planet we fortunately have
come back to the root premise and argument between world views. Such an occasion
provides a educational place of discernment where reason can triumph over
superstition, willful ignorance and global gullibility.
Dr. Julian Simon has presented the
world with the population economics of the ultimate resource-human beings. The
evolutionistic environmentalist world view is that we were all evolved from
lower life forms and have no right of preeminence over the world. We only get by
and can not therefore have the greater authority over the world we live in. As
Ingrid Newkirk
says, "a cat is a dog is a boy"...no hierarchy, no place of responsible
preeminence over the creation and certainly no order of relevance. The
creationistic environmentalist holds that man is to have charge over the world
he lives in and is uniquely authorized and equipped to conscientiously
enforce the tending of the garden that is his home. The evolutionistic
environmentalist relate to their world as a weed laden garden where no weed dare
be pulled and conversely, the creationistic environmentalist looks for weeds to
pull thereby increasing earths yield. World views matter and will bring us
environmental chaos or environmental order.
A few points of order are needed regarding the confused
anti-war protesters and their march on
Washington on 1/27/07. Among other things, they show
themselves to be fantastically useful idiots because they
have no enemy in their minds greater than President George
W. Bush and they are completely blind to the power that they
provide through such awful displays of idiocy to the
jihadists. They have Hollyweird spokesfolks telling us all
about the virtues of capitulating to the decapitators-thank
you Jane from us all. They dare mention comparisons to
Vietnam-where is the draft Hanoi Jane?
Vietnam was not a holy war like this one is.
Vietnam was not a battle with over 150 dead
on four commuter trains bombed in
Madrid.
Vietnam was not a battle where
a
Bali nightclub full with people was bombed.
Vietnam was not the tragedy of
several bomb explosions on the
London subway that killed and maimed hundreds of
people.
Vietnam was not 9/11.
The tragedy here is that these idiots play right into the
hands of the terrorists who know that the American network
news media will dutifully report their "voices of dissent"
for all the world to see and hear. The tragedy here is that
the American network news media is against the preeminence
of liberty in America and thus, ipso facto, for the
terrorists. When these idiots shout-bring the troops
home-our enemies hear this-we can and will defeat the
Americans and her allies because in
Washington they march against the war against us-they
are weak and lack the will to win. Such a rally is what
the other side needs in their efforts to boost the moral of
their fighters. We will NEVER-EVER witness a march against
the terrorist-insurgent-fighters in
Iraq by their own people. NEVER. Why? Because they
know the meaning of propaganda and because they are aware of
the consequences of such as it relates to their goal of
victory. Do you recall how that president Bush stated "that
you are either for us or against us" after 9/11? These
people who marched are so filled with hate for Republicans
and George Bush that they by virtue of this end up being FOR
Islamic tyranny. To the jihadist they are more than useful
idiots, they are useful infidels.
We have all heard the phrase that "actions speak louder than words" well, it
appears that the inactions of the Republicans to speak the words that describe
and defend their actions has spoken loud and clear in this mid-term election
process. Yes, that it is...a process, with many pages yet turned on the way to
the chapters ahead. Please don't hate President Bush so much, that is the job of
the foolishly blind miscreant nations that envy the United States. President
Bush is a convenient Logos of the incoherent left; flawed in many ways, yet he
represents what Lenin termed "ruggedness". He might not exercise the speaking
capabilities of the glib, however, he talks with the deeds and actions of an
a-political champion of world-wide liberty (not going to use the co-opted
word...global) for all people. Tyranny never rests. Liberty is always ours to
keep for if we don't who will?
What will the rings on the tree of Liberty show for our time and generation?
By any means, this election is not sequestered from an historic accountability.
This election is a dose of context, flavored with empirical relativism bearing
upon the next chapter of our self determination. If economy of thought
renders the direction of consensus obligated to the lowest common
denominator-bail and wail-it will still be alright. Why? Because the
power-celibate-dems will overplay their deprived hand and give the open door to
the conservatives of the opposition party a functional force of argument
wherewith to send the Pelosiites back and away to yesterday...in two short
years. Vote Democrat to open the door of our nation to the bombs of the Islamo-fascists
and Mexicrats-and conversely-vote Republican to keep the wolf away from the door
of our dear nation and liberty enabled way of life. Vote for why they want both
to kill us and join us-we shall overcome-by God's grace.
Thinking of Mark Foley the ex-congressman and his sins...he could have been a
political survivor and not been voted off the island by doing one or all of the
following. He needed to switch party affiliation from the republicans to the
democrats and scream about the gross intolerance being shown to his lifestyle.
Ok all wet...you might need a raincoat, tee hee. How about if after he switched
he fought the good fight of tolerance untried by the body politic as pertaining
to his egalitarian "mentorship" of those of the page hood class. Guess he
couldn't win for loosing, because one of the prize obfuscatorial possessions and
fault dodging moves of the liberals is that we JUST CAN'T LEGISLATE MORALITY!!!!
Lenin was able to kill and control because he understood freedom isn't free
and unless fought for it will be lost. This is chilling what he wrote, but we
need to read it in light of the world today.
Lenin's philosophy on social engineering
Always preach true democracy but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as
possible.
"Corrupt the young, get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex.
Make them superficial, destroy their ruggedness.
Get control of all means of publicity and thereby:
Get the peoples' mind off their government by focusing their
attention on athletics, sexy books and plays, and other trivialities.
Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on
controversial matters of no importance.
Destroy the peoples' faith in their natural leaders by holding up
the latter to ridicule, contempt and obloquy
Encourage government extravagance, destroy its credit, produce fear
with rising prices, inflation and general discontent.
Foment unnecessary strikes in vital industries, encourage civil
disorders and foster a soft and lenient attitude on the part of the
government towards such disorders.
By specious argument cause the breakdown of the old moral virtues:
honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.
Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with the view
of confiscating them and leaving the population defenseless."
Vladimir Ilich Lenin
What a difference five years can make!! America was humbled and humiliated on
September 11, 2001 by the wanton blind rage of Islamic freaks as they flew
commercial airliners into the World Trade towers of Manhattan, the Pentagon and
a open field in Pennsylvania. Once the horror and humiliation of the day turned
to anger and reciprocation, Americans were united to right that wrong and fight
all who were behind it. However, as we see today, the times have changed and the
liberal political harlots, many of whom sang "God bless America" on the Capital
steps, now seek to win elections over the dead bodies of that tragic day. They
look to the incredible sacrifices of our armed forces as unfortunate and vain.
They count at naught and politically calculate the hard fought successes of
killing the evil, terrorist enabling sons of Saddam Hussein, his removal and
capture, and elevating the status of women's rights in what was one of the
world's most oppressive regimes. To their politically useful world such things
are incredibly, in their words, a "failed policy". Beware of their selfishness
and distortions and call to mind the words of Thomas Paine..."
"These are the times that try men's souls:
The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink
from the service of his country; but he that stands it Now, deserves the
love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily
conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the
conflict the more glorius the triumph."
Thomas
Paine, The Crisis -- December 1776
Please, every living soul that values self determination and
liberty under law, reject the left's propaganda and inoculate your mind with
what happened five years ago on that bleak day in our history. In doing so, we
can resist the "summer soldieritis" of the deranged left.
Sometimes, it's just too easy to show the useful idiocy of the left. Current
exhibit; the "southern man intolerant" Neil Young of the blame
Canada-err-America first tribe. The Canada of today wouldn't exist except for
the America of today. This is a fact of circumstance since America is willing to
defeat and not placate terrorist. Now let's review Mr. Young's latest attempt to
make money...
Let’s impeach the president for lying WHAT DID HE LIE
ABOUT? Question-Do politicians lie to help or HURT their cause?
And leading our country into war WHAT ABOUT THE 17 United
Nations resolutions that Saddam lied about ?
Abusing all the power that we gave him ABUSED? WE GAVE HIM-O
CANADA?
And shipping all our money out the door YOUR MONEY?
He’s the man who hired all the criminals FUNNY-CONVICTIONS
The White
House shadows who hide behind closed doors TIME FOR THE ALUMINUM
FOIL SKULL CAP
And bend the facts to fit with their new stories YOU MEAN LIKE WHEN
SADDAM GASSED HIS OWN?
Of why we have to send our men to war YOU MEAN LIKE WHEN SADDAM PAID
THE SUICIDE BOMBERS 25G'S PER
Let’s impeach the president for spying DID A VICTIM OF THIS EVER COME
FORTH?
On citizens inside their own homes RIGHT MR. YOUNG, JUST LIKE THE IRS
Breaking every law in the country EVERY LAW? WOW...
By tapping our computers and telephones AND WHO WAS LED AWAY IN CUFFS?
What if Al Qaeda blew up the levees JUST GIVE THEM AN IDEA JACKASS!!!
Would New Orleans have been safer that way DUNNO? HOW ABOUT THE
TOPOGRAPHY -IT IS A SEA LEVEL THING
Sheltered by our government’s protection HUH? YOUNG LIKES TO RHYME FOR
A DIME!
Or was someone just not home that day? EVERY LAW? WOW...
Let’s impeach the president O HELL-BIN LADEN IS LESS EFFECTIVE
NEIL-WAKE UP-IMPEACH HIM!!
For hijacking our religion and using it to get elected WHAT RELIGION
IS THAT? THE GLASS HOUSE?
Dividing our country into colors CHOCOLATE...see RAY
NAGIN...CHOCOLATE
And still leaving black people neglected LIKE COLIN POWELL AND
CONDALESA RICE, ET AL...
Thank god he’s racking down on steroids BASEBALL...THE CANADIAN, ERR,
AMERICAN PASTIME...
Since he sold his old baseball team SORRY NEIL FOR NOT CONSULTING YOU
FIRST...
There’s lot of people looking at big trouble DON'T BE SO JUDGMENTAL
But of course the president is clean FINALLY... YOU GOT THAT RIGHT (1
for 24... back to the minors for you Neil)
Thank God GO AHEAD...TAKE THAT NAME IN VAIN...
Well, well, decades before hurricane Katrina and armed with simple knowledge
of the limited construction of New Orleans and with the political opportunism of
Howard Dean-folks back then could prospectively BLAME the current President Bush
for the hurricane of "today" for the flooding of New Orleans. If not, why not,
because twenty years ago, as it is today, New Orleans was below sea level and
exceedingly vulnerable to flooding from a hurricane. The criticism that Bush did
nothing to help the Katrina destruction might be found in a time capsule that
doesn't exist-except in the liberal hysteria
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060422/pl_nm/democrats_dc of today.
Unless "congressional, senatorial and presidential LAW makers" act against
the imported LAW breakers-there will be NO functioning law in the U.S.A.
pertaining to the "law breaking, illegal immigrants" who are boldly flaunting
the legal process by which American citizenship is "lawfully obtained". The left
is drunk with cheap votes and the right is drunk with cheap labor and as both
scramble to play this avalanche of anarchy for their individual political
benefit, the law abiding are stunned by this implicit disrespect of their
compliance with the law. Question, if the lawless claim that their
cause justified because they are "doing jobs that other Americans wont do" to the extent that such a
claim exempts them from filing their income tax returns-what are the powers that
be to do? They are as equally if not more lawless since they both create law and
then irregularly and preferentially "apply" it. If we have two standards we have
NO standards. Mob rule is winning over the rule of law. The United States is in
sourcing civil war and anarchy. In a corollary, the elitist leftists of France have seen the fruit of their "liberal immigration
laws" and now realize what a mistake they are and...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1530481/posts... what will it take for
them to preserve their culture and self determination. Here in America, where
and when will the producer class wake up and smell the barbarians in our midst?
Unless our "conservative" soul realizes that by definition, it must be
different from the works of the left, the Republican party will become as luke
warm as an Hans Blicks interview. I thought there was a line in the sand. I
thought we were to work against the religious tyranny and their advocates in the
old media. Yet, every day we succumb to the cartoon world of the
pro-Taliban-democratic party; why?
The way out of whack and crazy "news story" about Dick Cheney's quail hunting
mishap is indicative of a hyper negative-anti Bush news cohort. They are the
gang that couldn't shoot strait-and will spray their hysterical game load at
anything that isn't left of center. By by birdie.
The very mention of the current state of Iranian "need" for nuclear
generated, domestic energy is bogus and flagrantly vacant of truth. Consider
that Iran is awash in oil and is not lacking in the capability of using it for any
pertinent energy need. But yet, the "reason" that this country "needs" nuclear potency is
to provide for their basic domestic needs. Just needy, needy, needy-oh my. Like
"needing" to destroy. Like "needing" to feel that your retrograde, seventh
century world view can guide the world to a better way. Iran, please consider carefully
that which you are about to do, for with it will come the recompense of the
reward and words will no longer matter. God is love and your nation SHOWS none.
"For to him that shows mercy, will mercy be given. Question,...would your
"leaders" even be on the world media if the west had not invented it? Remember,
you don't lead the world in angst-we all are kinda pissed off and me thinks you
better scale it right for when the whip comes down, might will make right. Who
says all deaths are righteous under your cloud-we die selflessly-you die
selfishly. So shall America show her grace and works of righteousness. Go ahead,
and cry about that cartoon...the pen is mightier than the sword.
With marking a new year should come a greater sense of renewed purpose and
devotion to liberty. We also should see how progress toward greater liberty
entails greater sacrifice. The day of humanity being complete will never come on
this side of eternity. However, what direction we move in is dependent upon both
our capability to recognize and to fight against tyranny. The main stream media
will always (in a guilt ridden ethos) focus on America's failings at the
expenses of her demonstrated greatness: it is all about their world view and how
they base their news coverage upon it. Thank God for the internet and the
substantial countermeasure it represents to the liberal press. Take a moment and
consider that the newspapers that once held such dominance are now in decline
and the blogs and cable news channels are growing exponentially. This is
something that will continue in this new year. Bob Dylan's song, "The times are a'changing" has new meaning for the liberals and conservatives alike.
One must remember that Queen Hillary Rodham once wished aloud for an edit button
for the internet. May all of
you have a healthy and prosperous new year. Thank you for visiting this web
site!
The comments of the Democratic party chairman Howard Dean and Senator John
Kerry of Massachusetts have the pedigree of the infamous propagandist "Axis
Sally" of WWII. These two sour grape losers claim they are for the troops
but call them "losers"
and "terrorists".
With "supporters" of our military like this, who needs enemies?
Obvious to the oblivious is the hyper cost of life and liberty at the
gas pump, the flight line, the check out line and the bottom line. Under the
current system upon which we elevate ourselves from the earthworm the
predominate fuel of liberty is under attack...as it should be...as it must be by
those who feel guilty over their place in the food chain. Total hypocrisy.
Without the bright lights and mobile society (which they decry) providing the
host for their parasitical carnival, being their irrelevant selves would prove
even more impossible. The corner we are painted into as a nation comes from the
church of the spotted owl. It comes from the general assembly of the snail
darter spoken of in the catechism of the big bang. Guilt, for the green weenie
is laughed at in "Christianity" yet embraced when "the earth is in balance"-and
who is preachin' here? Who is imposing their morals on who?
It is fun to see the current movie WAR OF THE WORLDS and fancifully
question the root of our cosmic irrationality. The focus of where we are as a
world on edge begs the question... is it all worth it? Yes it is. The road we
are on is a jolting pothole existence that holds the fruit of the winding road.
SOMETIMES THE PRICE OF FUEL HOLDS US BACK.. how we look at the open road tells
us where it will take us. We just need the eyes and heart to see and some steady
hands upon the wheel of life and prayers to trust that it will turn our way.
Start your engines.
Why does any thoughtful observer reason that the upcoming elections in Iraq
will result in an united Iraq? If one holds to the thought that Iraqi voters
envision a better quality of life with self-directed national leadership, such
thinking should be based upon where that nation has "come from" with
Saddam in control and where it's collective soul will take it post Saddam. Iraq
as well as the United States found common ground in a common enemy when the
capstone of liberty was laid. The U.S.A. was once a group of dissenting,
divided, headstrong parts of a gossamer winged ideal that eventually formed
"one nation, under God, indivisible...". Iraq is united against what
Saddam wrought as were the colonies against what the crown compelled. If this
"us vs. them" attitude of free thinking Iraqis can hold up against the
anarchist-terrorist-islamo-fascists then they will succeed in self governing.
The durability of a free Iraq will only go as far as their passion for liberty
will take them. It must also be said that America was and is a free nation
because of the providence of the Almighty. The question is for Iraq just how
long God will leave the door open for them to flee God in their own image and
embrace the God in whose image we are made. Who will be the father of modern
Iraq? What will be his world view? As for America, we see what George Washington
felt was the bulwark of sustained liberty by his own words.. “Of
all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and
morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of
Patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great Pillars of human
happiness….” According to Washington, no atheist was a patriot! And he
added, “reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality
can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.” Far from the popular idea
that we can have morality without religion, Washington knew better and warned
against it in his last words to the nation. Iraq was an example of a purely
secular society under Saddam and now it is free to live up to the challenges of
voting for liberty. The true God of us all is a God of life and peace. The
Islamic terrorists claim to do Allah's bidding, yet they find no peace in this
life and have contempt for life itself. By their fruits you will know them. The
basis for liberty is the truth that will set one free.
CBS and the Rather problem is a proxy for the old media and it's "truth
cartel" snobbery. With such bad reporting set against today's
hyper-competitive news market, this example of old guard media will fall on it's
own. The methodology of the left that keeps the "bible chained and
translated in a tongue foreign to the common man" will be seen and
overthrown. Courage.
As this year draws to a close, let us pause and think about the nature of our
human condition and apply our hearts to wisdom as we number our days. The year
2004 provided the United States with an election that affirmed the nation's
course of deliberate destruction of religious tyranny. Predominantly elected
were candidates that focused on the basic safety of our wonderfully blessed way
of life. It was understood by the majority of Americans that, without such, all
else is academic, vain and falls by the hand of oppression. We saw many pay the
ultimate price in that effort and scores of others suffering
injury to destroy the enemies of liberty abroad so Americans wouldn't be
threatened domestically. We also voted for common sense morality pertaining to
marriage as being defined by one man and one woman. We saw greed played out in
THE largest scandal in United Nations history euphemistically called "the
oil for food" program. The tsunami ended the year with horrible
devastation that made many question the goodness of God. However, it must be
stated that this earth is cursed and all of it will eventually pass away. Such
disasters allow man to show his love to his fellow man while pondering the
feeble existence we all occupy at natures favor. The old year will be remembered
for these and other noteworthy yet passing events as will be the new year to be
sure. The bottom line for all of us is to keep perspective on just how limited
our time is on earth while looking for the eternal to swallow up the temporal-we
all live on borrowed time. God bless the readers of this site and may 2005 be in
your favor.
Anti-Christian bigotry is alive and well in the
American public school system. Two recent news stories should be looked at to
substantiate this charge and they are tremendously valuable to sift through to
analyze how these bigots think. NOVEMBER 24--A California teacher who teaches
his fifth-grade students with the aid of primary source documents like the
Declaration of Independence has been ordered by school administrators to stop
using such artifacts of American history because the material contains
references to God. In the federal discrimination lawsuit, filed Monday
in U.S. District Court, Steven Williams contends that brass at Cupertino's
Stevens Creek School have recently rejected his use of "curriculum-related
handouts" like the Declaration, various state constitutions, George
Washington's journal, John Adams's diary, and writings by William Penn. Williams
alleges that the San Francisco-area school's principal, Patricia Vidmar, banned
the use of these handouts because "many original source documents from the
founding era contain references to God and Christianity." Why do these
references cause such censorship? Why such fear? Simple, because the left is a
jealous left and will have no other Gods before it. Mind control starts with
history revisionism and ends with useful ignorance. Thanksgiving is not giving
thanks to the government or the state it is giving thanks to God that allowed
our free system of government to exist and thereby allow a free people to
prosper. Let us look at the other story and see the same type of paranoia at
work.
Young students across the state of Maryland read stories about the Pilgrims
and Native Americans, simulate Mayflower voyages, hold mock feasts and
learn about the famous meal that temporarily allied two very different groups. But
what teachers don't mention when they describe the feast is that the Pilgrims
not only thanked the Native Americans for their peaceful three-day indulgence,
but repeatedly thanked God.
"We teach about Thanksgiving from a purely historical perspective, not
from a religious perspective," said Charles Ridgell, St. Mary's County
Public Schools curriculum and instruction director. School administrators
statewide agree, saying religion never coincides with how they teach
Thanksgiving to students. This is not teaching history this is hiding from
history. Here is what the pilgrims wrote as they made their way into the land
which we now call America...from the Mayflower Compact in 1793.
"In ye name of God, Amen. We whose names are underwritten, the loyall
subjects of our dread soveraigne Lord, King James, by the grace of God, of Great
Britaine, Franc, and Ireland king, defender of the faith, etc.
Haveing undertaken, for ye glorie of God, and advancemente of ye Christian
faith, and honour of our king & countrie, a voyage to plant ye first colonie
in ye Northerne parts of Virginia, doe by these presents solemnly & mutualy
in ye presence of God, and one of another, covenant & combine our selves
togeather into a civill body politick, for our better ordering &
preservation & furtherance of ye ends aforesaid; and by vertue hearof to
enacte lawes, ordinances, acts constitutions, & offices, from time to time,
as shall be thought most meet & convenient for ye generall good of ye
Colonie, unto which we promise all due submission and obedience. In witnes
wherof we have hereunder subscribed our names at Cap-Codd ye 11th. of November,
in ye year of ye raigne of our soveraigne lord, King James, of England, France,
& Ireland ye eighteenth, and of Scotland, ye fiftie fourth. Ano: Dom.
1620." Telling the story of the first Thanksgiving without referencing God
and the pilgrims faith is like trying to swim on dry sand. Why do the property
taxes that are paid to fund the school system fall into the hands of
propagandist indoctrinators? The state holds property owners hostage to the
"protection money" that is paid as property tax. The fastest way to
see who really owns "your" property is to protest the payment of this
tax money. Conditional payment is not allowed, payment under all circumstances
is mandatory. We must pay taxes but we must have more control over their usage.Finding a way to strip the school system of it's anti-Christian
proselytizing power is how to solve this bigotry. That is why home schooling and
private schooling are vital to breaking the brainwashing of our children. Please
support your community efforts and foundations that support the parents of the
private and home schooled children. The
denial and bitterness of the left over something (GOD) bigger than they are is sick.
In the most blasphemous and self-serving stretch of political imagination,
Sen. Hillary Clinton recently made the observation that "Jesus was a
democrat". Listed for your consideration are some basic reasons why Jesus
was neither a democrat or a republican. This is not written to convert but to
contradict this lunacy. Jesus came to this earth as a suffering servant and said
"Foxeshaveholes and birds of the air have
nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head." He didn't live
luxuriously as the high and mighty Mrs. Clinton does. He was most upset with the
hypocrisy of the religious leaders of his day and he wasn't preoccupied with
political ambition. And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar
the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. With
the democrats all thing belong to CAESAR. Jesus didn't pander but spoke the
truth to all he spoke to and never spoke one thing to one group and another
thing to another group. He had this to say to the religious leaders of his
day-keep in mind that modern day democrats thrive off of duplicity. " The
teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat. 3So you
must obey them and do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for
they do not practice what they preach. 4They tie up heavy loads and
put them on men's shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to lift a
finger to move them. 5"Everything they do is done for men to
see: They make their phylacteries wide and the tassels on their garments long; 6they
love the place of honor at banquets and the most important seats in the
synagogues; 7they love to be greeted in the marketplaces and to have
men call them 'Rabbi.' 8"But you are not to be called 'Rabbi,'
for you have only one Master and you are all brothers. 9And do not
call anyone on earth 'father,' for you have one Father, and he is in heaven. 10Nor
are you to be called 'teacher,' for you have one Teacher, the Christ. 11The
greatest among you will be your servant. 12For whoever exalts himself
will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. Like when Kerry
"tried to get him a hunting license". Ironically, the blue blood
Hillary said some years ago with caustic condescension "I suppose I could
stay home and bake cookies". Funny how she is appealing to those stay home
mom's vote now! It is a great victory for common sense morality that these
political harlots are "coming out of the closet" to say "we got
Jesus too" all of this will demonstrate how deranged they are and will harm
their cause. The red state people that voted against them won't buy it and their
blue state supporters have got to be wondering what happened to their
"progressive" candidates. Bottom line is that moral is as moral does
not what moral says... just like Kerry quoted from scripture...if a man has
faith without deeds what good is it?
Please thank a vet today. "All
that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing",
(Edmund Burke) is a quote that comes to mind when we consider the great good
that the U.S. military does in liberty's quest and preservation. The world is
mostly free today because of the American armed forces doing the heavy lifting
of divine intervention, working the will of ordained liberty against tyranny and
subjugation. This work will never be finished until the end of this age. Yet, as
this last election proves, "the pen is mightier than the sword". In
the gospel we find the truth that, (John 15:13) "greater love has no one
than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends". Please
thank a vet today.
Over the next couple of months, leading up to George W. Bush's inauguration,
for all the world to see, the left will attempt to redefine itself. What does
this say about them? What it says is that they really can't be who they are and
win nationally. This won't be the same process that the left used during the
"moderation" of George Bush (father of George W) when they used that
"moderation" against him. The left can't and won't
"moderate" toward the right because the left, in order to be the left,
CAN'T moderate. They are blind guides of the blind. There isn't a split the
difference bone in their political body. The point to this is still based on
their phobia of the plebeian underclass and all their messy independence. What
do you call 100,000 liberals "defecting" to Canada? A good start, a
really good start.
Wow, what a tragedy of the left,
that is, to say, that the political right is in need of "education" after the
right's vote in the 2004 election. It is as if the left had no clue as to what
brought them their liberty. Thomas
Jefferson wrote, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of
Happiness". The left, ignorantly stumbling after their supposed freedom, decry the voted choice
of the right for either I.Q., or supposed extra chromosome or hick index reasons. It is great
that they can't reason their losses out because if they did, future election
losses for them would be turned into victories. If it is fixed, PLEASE don't break it. Go Paul
Begala, James Carville, et al! We love Dean!
Well done G.O.P. and the new media. Thank you for keeping your focus and
sending Soros, Hollywood America, academia, etc away disappointed in the
election of 2004. The analogy of incrementalism relating to heating the water up
on a frog slowly enough to boil him before he realizes his circumstance was
rejected in this election because the frog has jumped. The pressure issues of
gay marriage, partial birth abortion and global tests proved too much for the
frog to take and as a result, he has made it safely, for now, out of the water
and is back where he belongs. It isn't from the pan to the fire but from the pan
into common sense government. The Democratic party is now in denial and has it's
focus on where it can make money and hide behind it's rhetoric. Thank you Terry
McAuliffe for presenting such viability and strength for the democratic
party. For conservatives, this is a time of wonder since it has been a
generation since a Republican president was reelected and gained seats in the
house and senate. This must not be squandered but be used to nullify the
pathetic socialism of the American left. Both in word and deed, conservative
republicans must prove themselves worthy of this fantastically unique moment in
American history. They dare not reach across the isle to a discredited party
that represents a discredited ideology. They dare not look success in the eye
and wonder if it is really for them. They must keep the pressure on the left for
SOLUTIONS, for ANSWERS, for ACCOUNTABILITY about how their governance has led
America down the road to serfdom. King Richard III might have said, "My
kingdom for a horse" but the democrats are now saying "Where are all
our sheep? Our kingdom was all our sheep. Remember to think what we tell you-you
the sheeple..we mean people..."
The general election of 2004 is one more ring on liberty's tree and going
with that metaphor, this has been a year of drought for common sense in the
electorate. This race is close because many Americans have a feeble sense of
liberty's cost and are ready to mistakenly trade their liberty for supposed
security. Kerry voters are ready to allow terrorists all the time they need to
control our future because, in the way they see things, the work of keeping
themselves free is harder than the delusional acceptance of a pre 9/11 world.
The real issue is that 9/11 was another mile marker on the terrorists highway to
victory over our liberty and way of life. John Kerry has fooled enough useful
idiots to accept his words while hiding his votes against all manor of weapon
systems that would have secured our liberty through strength. He is a huge
proponent of less is more for our military. Less research and development, less
body armor, less guns and advanced field equipment, etc. Spitballs anyone? He
has a running mate who is a trial lawyer and a friend of big law in all of it's excessive,
greedy worst. Yet Ted Kennedy and his perverted world view and voting record
can't match the socialism of Kerry and Edwards. President Bush, conversely, has
looked at the problem of terrorism and has set a path to destroy it and render
it a by product of the seventh century. When America was attacked on 9/11 we
were given a wake up call and a chance to act so as to keep it from happening
again. President Bush has seized upon the darkness of September eleventh to work
through the problem and remind everyone about their way of life being at stake.
This issue transcends all others in this election year because if we, through
terrorism, have our economy made so weak that job losses occur and are reduced
as a people to worrying when the next shoe will drop, we will have given the
terrorists what they wanted all along. President Bush has the faith in the
electorate and will, behind closed doors pray for liberty's triumph over
terrorism. He has seen the failure of socialism and will fight to keep it away.
Kerry in the campaign spoke of words vs. deeds being the measure of the faith of
a faithful man and isn't it ironic that the deeds of Kerry contradict his
campaign verbiage of strength through appeasement. So folks, vote for individual
liberty and the divesting of the big government. So much for the character of
Kerry. President Bush will seek more liberty and pursue it with all the military
power the situation needs. In summation, vote liberty, vote for your children
and their children to remain free. Look at deeds not words from an admitted war
criminal. Also, look at the president and see the successful, ongoing victory
over those who want to destroy our land and those who love it.
What comes next? If Kerry is elected president, what will come next? Feeble
self-defeating introspection as part of the" we are not worthy of
preeminence" in the worlds totem pole. If Bush is reelected, the progress
against the terrorist's plexus will remain. Kerry is a wanton political harlot
that politicizes politics to perversion. Polls show Kerry in trouble in his
campaign: he might he fall and never recover. Let's hope so.
It bears repeating, that is, the words of those who put the law to self
government and worked the labor of constitutional self government for their time
as well as our time. For as this election approaches, this electorate must vote
for liberty without regard for the propagandist recriminations from the left.
Please consider these quotes as you consider what candidates exemplify them in
their words, deeds and world view.
John
Adams said, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending
with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was
made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the
government of any other. Oct. 11, 1798, Address to the military
God
who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought
secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the minds of
men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated
but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is
just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.
--Thomas Jefferson
Those
people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants. -William Penn
"The
basis of our Bill of Rights comes from the teachings we get from Exodus and St.
Matthew, from Isaiah and St. Paul. I don't think we emphasize that enough these
days. If we don't have a proper fundamental moral background, we will finally
end up with a government which does not believe in rights for anybody except the
State!"
Harry S. Truman, Thirty-Third President
We
have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of
mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern
ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten
Commandments of God. --James Madison, chief architect of the Constitution
I
believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people
by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden
usurpations. --James Madison
Only
a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious,
they have more need of masters.
--Benjamin Franklin
Let
us not fall in line with the rest of history, whose fate was described by
Alexander Hamilton when he wrote..."But if experience, in this instance,
verifies the lesson long taught by the enemies of liberty, that the bulk of
mankind are not fit to govern themselves; that they must have a master, and were
only made for the rein and the spur; we shall see the final triumph of despotism
over liberty; the advocates of the latter must acknowledge it to be an ignis
fatuus, and abandon the pursuit. With the greatest advantages for promoting it
that a people ever had, we shall have betrayed the cause of human nature.---A
letter from Hamilton to the citizens of New York containing remarks on Mentor's
reply, 1784
Kerry and Edwards are suddenly finding religion as they try to find votes.
Kerry goes to a predominately black church in Miami, Florida to do what?... mix
politics and religion? Did he go there to make the I.R.S. revoke the tax
exempt status of that church? No, did he go there as most demogogs, in the
Democratic party, in order to pander for votes while revitalizing the inept in the pews and
appeal to their irrational fears about Republicans? Church members could listen to the
pastor preach against sodomy and for the sanctity of life out of one side of his
mouth and then praise Kerry out the other side of his mouth. The pastor of the
Miami church endorsed Kerry from the pulpit in almost messianic terms, telling
his congregation, "For every Goliath, God has a David. For every Calvary's
cross, God has a Christ Jesus. To bring our country out of despair,
discouragement, despondency, and disgust, God has a John Kerry." Wow and we
thought it says (until the ACLU has it's way) on our currency, "In God we
trust". Barry Lynn and his group, Americans united for the separation of
church and state, if they were true to their stated cause, should be all over
Kerry and denounce his appearance at that church. But because the liberals are hypocrites
and soullessly opportunistic, they will turn a blind eye to their
man Kerry. John Edwards also gets into the act by pretending to be a healer of those
with spinal cord injuries by telling them that, 'We
will stop juvenile diabetes, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and other debilitating
diseases...When John Kerry is president, people like Christopher Reeve are
going get up out of that wheelchair and walk again.' Edwards made the
scientifically unsubstantiated campaign promises during 30-minute speech at
Newton High School gym in Newton, Iowa...These two are bizarre, twisted political chameleons that only
those with a multiple personality disorder could logically vote for. Maybe stem
cells can cure them?
The situation that CBS and Dan Rather are in is a direct result of their bias
against president George W. Bush. It wasn't what they did as much as what they
failed to do that put them in this hole. Their negligence to verify the sources
and attendant document's validity shows motive and prejudicial preoccupation with
discrediting president George W. Bush. For if such a source and documents for
Kerry in a similar situation were there for the reporting, they would be deemed
dubious and not newsworthy. Rather and the gang were sooo eager to wound the
Bush reelection with concocted documents and bogus sources that purportedly cast
Bush in a bad light that customary journalistic verification of said information
went by the wayside as they rushed like liberal lemmings off the cliff to
"expose" George W. Most on the left say that this is all about poor
reporting and nothing more but is much more than that. The way CBS chose to
ignore the words of the widow and son of 1Lt. Bush's squadron commander Col.
Killian, "sources" who had first hand knowledge of that situation and
said that CBS was in error reveals the heart of Dan and the gang. The scalp
hunting here is shameful and dangerous, yet the left has crossed
the line undeniably confirming the suspicions of news consumers that
the networks, et al, are sources that are faulty to a fault. They are trying to
hold their ground but it is impossible to do so since the ground is crumbling
beneath them.
Bush and Kerry...Kerry and Bush where she stops no one knows but what is seen
and known is a useful kind of prejudice and wanton, abject don't
confuse me with the facts vendetta of myoptic, leftist angst. The failsafe
hatred against George W is so strong that an unviable tissue mass could run
against President Bush and be portrayed as the second coming of JFK. Votes are cast to make life better and votes are not cast to make
life better as well. Seen in this election season are words and deeds...the
words of candidate Kerry vs. the deeds as Senator Kerry. If a man have faith and
not deeds, tell us JF***K what that means? If means are to an end? Conversely are the politically
courageous words and parallel deeds of President Bush in actions against the
enemy. If you were a terrorist where would your vote be cast?
Hollywood values are great for Hollywood-Americans. Kerry/Edwards are full of
self-serving rhetoric for those selfish-Americans so described. The way of
liberals rules their blind nature into accepting government as our benefactor.
Yes, they are the first to call into question the patriot act for limiting their
liberty while calling on greater government to relieve them from the behemoth
government that comes with the present day Democratic party. Confused? Yes and
so are they.
Each year the occasion of July fourth is time to consider the principal of
individual primacy under law and limited government. America has a rich heritage
of rejecting self serving overlords and voting to elect clear and simple
thinkers who value individual liberty and individual rights. The bill of rights
is for protection from the government and not the stepping stone for unlimited
government. So, with these considerations, it is with this fourth of July that
America must consider the nature of the two presidential candidates and vote to
keep our liberty under law ongoing. We are all conditioned to think (as the
partisan press would have us ) that our liberty originates with government yet,
truth be told, liberty is from God and is protected or threatened by the whim of
man. So let us consider the value of the state and the value of man who gives
the state its value. Unless our schoolrooms become open and honest we will
continue to reap vanity of purpose as a nation and watch our children loose
vision and hope. our take it sometime for granted. On a different note, please
visit www.wallbuilders.com or www.constitutionparty.com/
to see how liberty is good for the people but bad for the ruling class-Kerry
types.
The partisan media is engaged in jihad against the successful reelection of
George W. Bush. Their holy war in influencing this election flows from their
world view that oppressive government preeminence is the perfect direction for
humanity. The liberal press "has religion" and it is beating the
American public over the head with the news that fits their views. They will
ignore that Iraq is in transition from decades of horrible human rights
enormities by Saddam Hussein and his clan yet, they will portray any misstep by
America and the coalition as the worst kind of self indulgence. They go out of
their way to keep hidden the savage butchering of the Iraqis under Saddam.
Recently, the media had a chance to see a video of the torture by Saddam upon
his people at an event held by The American Enterprise Institute www.aei.org.
They left right after a press conference because they didn't want to see people
getting their fingers cut off, castrations, tongues being cut out with razor
blades and beheadings. No, instead they must go back to the interrogations of
Iraqi criminals in Abu Ghraib prison and crusade against them. The partisan
media is guilty of profiling America more ethically upright than Saddam because
if Saddam did such it would be expected. However, since America did this (and
with a Republican president) it is cause for major investigations and outrage.
In showing just how supposedly evil American
servicemen are this media cult reveals their duplicity and partisanship! They are blind guides of the blind. Let's keep their ratings
going down and reward their gospel of blame Bush for everything with the one
thing liberals love most and that is the all mighty dollar.
With the passing of former president Ronald Reagan the deck is clear for the crocodile
tears to flow from the left who opposed him in life. This time of mourning is
for the honest and dishonest and shows the time for all who live that they too
will die. Ronald Reagan held the stage of his life as the 40th president and
lived liberty in his great way of destiny. Providence brings all of us to the
point of self recognition and self purpose, and with that, some of us find just
how we will be remembered. Reagan was great because he was the bearer of
greatness; he came to win-equipped with the ethos of individual liberty and
limited government as the champion of all people. Whenever and wherever man is
free to live his dreams, all societies grow great. President Reagan worked to
elevate and prosper the commoner as well as the privileged. All of us are
created equal and have been given much and will do much if government allows.
This simple truth is still alive today and always shall be. Reagan lived a life
of cultural leverage at the behest of common sense commoners who found his way
quite liberating. Yes, there is a better way. Reagan lived and lives on as the
pattern for enjoying self determination of the whole man and woman. Thank you
President Reagan.
We must note that all people who hate hate have had enough of the haters. All
people that is, exept the liberals who hate George W enough to subjugate their
own blood bought liberty to political lust and their crusade for the re-acquisition
of governing power. All those of the world who champion liberty, must flee
the "Summer Soldier" ethos and reject the point of purchase political
mindset of the partisan American media to continue in self determination. If
Al-Quida is good for liberty then why are the liberals so opposed to those that
oppose them? That is, circumstances be ignored, that liberals are really
advocates of liberty ? Note that the bulwark of a free people is the learned
scope of freedom and what is needed to keep it from destruction. Conversely, the
bulwark of the oppressor is the learned scope of devaluing freedom and making
all who live in it's light fatigued in the quest to keep it.
It must feel great to be a liberal since the world is a nice tidy place where
everything that is wrong with it is George Dubya' s fault. Whether it is
not enough cranberries to harvest or too many one armed paper hangers it is
George Bush's fault. Iraq would be "safer" if we let Saddam fund the
tentacles of terror around the globe if it were not for George W. Bush. Peace,
love and understanding would be felt by Israel and hamas like no one could imagine if
it were not for W. When as a child we thought like a child, reasoned as a child
and entertained childish thoughts but since growing up we were learned by our
collective life experiences to deduce fact from fancy and right from wrong. This
is true unless you follow the utter bilge of the most liberal U. S. Senator John
Kerry because his words describe a world that only he can improve and in his vanity
of mind only liberals can fix. Conversely, conservatives don't need to portray
liberals as the problem because they are the problem. For one to specifically prove
this statement, look to the chaos of the inner city and identify that this is
the fruit of liberalism. Too much government, not too little government is the
problem since most big city problems derive from liberal big government
"feel good" programs that never fix any problem in a final way.
Education is a topic that is supposedly a "liberal issue" because as
the story goes, Republicans want to see the inner city schools fail and have all
the students dumbed down and unprepared to make their way in life. It is ironic
that the liberals are the ones who have this exact result despite their
wonderful words and destructive policies. When the path of less government and
more individual liberty is tried to remedy a problem vis-à-vis school vouchers (look
at the google search) the liberals are all against it because if, through
the vouchers, the problem is solved, then government liberalism is shown to be
the problem and therefore rejected at the ballot box. The problem all Americans
face is simple honesty of policy versus the self serving deception of the power
hungry left. Even with this limited example and expository, the fact is, these
situations need to get worse before the reality of liberalism's structural flaws
overrides any spin the left puts on it. It is hoped that life will learn the
minds of the politically blind to the hazards of trusting in a government that
seems to be big enough to do everything for them while it is definitely big
enough to do anything to them.
The world of words fails to express the utter disdain and disgust that this
site holds for ted kennedy and robert byrd; they don't even deserve the respect
of proper capitalization. Both of these treasonous Saddam lovers hate the cause
of liberty and love the way of the tyrant. They want the Taliban to triumph and
want Muqtada al-Sadr to have his hate printed in his newspaper so that the
coalition forces might fail. Imagine the joy the Islamafreaks get when they hear
this from byrd and kennedy. Their treasonously liable rhetoric is designed to
undermine liberty and justice for the free world. byrd was a kkk member-say no
more and kennedy is a defiled, debauched, philandering political whore who seeks
to regain power on the dead bodies of our armed forces. teddy Chappaquiddick
needs to speak about what he knew and when he lied about it concerning Mary Jo
Kopechne before he lies about President Bush. ted needs to speak to why he and
his party calculate political gain as leveraged by liberty lost in Iraq.
America's representative government should never represent radical Islam, yet
that is what is going on with these two pieces of @#it.
It has been said that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. True, the
best always leads to imitation amongst the least creative (airamericaradio.com).
The relevance of imitation found new low ground on 3/31/04 as the American radio
airwaves became shadowed by liberal anti-Rush Limbaugh, et al wanna be's. Point
of reference, conservative radio talk shows were a necessary function arising
out of the complete "above the fold" liberal media dominance resident
in television (ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC): resident in the print media N.Y. Times,
Washington Post, etc as well as the brain washing and punitive grading schemes
operating in academia. Conservative radio talk shows worked their relevance as a
literal "voice in the wilderness" juxtaposed against the preponderance
of liberal media control. This is and continues to be the "how and
why" that defines the success of conservative talk radio and the ensuing
popularity of the FOX cable television network. The libs were a type of truth
cartel that made public opinion in their own image and did so uncontested.
However, since liberals are myopic and self-servingly disingenuous, when then
logical reaction of a free people manifested itself in the conservative talk
radio phenomenon, they moved to, as they "saw it" to counter this
supposed unfair tool of the right. The reason this leftist radio rebuttal will
fail is because the liberals are not moved by the operation of necessity being
the mother of invention; they are moved by delusional paranoia and fail to see
the above-explained contextual construct. Conservatives have many hills to climb
as they reason out positions on the issues of the day and then fight the
overarching intimidation of the left as they express and vote on them. Liberals
rely on mindless feel good motives and rampant peer pressure to conform to the
role the main steam media would have them to play. Just look at the immature and
plebian ethos of their vanguard to lead one to this inescapable conclusion. Vain
is as vain does.
If your libelous and you know it clap your hands (or apologize-what ever that
means?) if your a tragedy profiteer and you know it promote your book, if you
vindictive and you know it and you really want to show it coordinate the release
of your book with a witch hunt hearing against President Bush. Way to go, Mr.
Easy money (smear man) Richard Clarke author of the book Against
All Republicans, uh, AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, we think,
if your duplicity were rain, Mr. Clarke, the desert would never be dry again.
Let us catch our breath here and you can more easily too, since you have two
mouths to talk out of and unconscientiously preach from. Do you think the
terrorists love all the intelligence that is coming form these democratic, burn
um at the stake, hearings? What a country!!! Thought of the day...let us reveal
via these hearings, how the United States gathers intelligence so that the
"holy people" who want to eliminate us from the face of the earth (Ali
Ali in free degenerates) can beat us to the punch for their next attack!!! What
a wonderful group of "truth seekers" are these demorats, far be it
from the value of a free society to know when to hold them and when to fold them
in an election year. What a profane and disgraceful disregard to logic and basic
patriotic duty to our conscientiously self determined liberty. The Democrats are
mortgaging America's future captivity with the down payment of slanderous demagoguery
of America pre 9/11/01.
America's political process of presidential elections is looked upon by the
tyrants of the world as a frightening event. The ability of the governed to
select their leaders is antithetical to tyrants and makes them fear that one day
free elections will take them out of power. Yet, even with our ability to elect our
leaders, most Americans take the election process lightly as shown by low voter
turnout. Most American's political ignorance is self-imposed regarding the
issues of the day because they watch and believe the evening networks and these
news organizations are significantly biased toward the left. (please
reference the media research group's website) So it shouldn't be too
surprising to see that the left leaning media ignores important and influential
news stories that show their candidate in a bad light. Such an article that
shows just how real the foreign leaders (Mubarak is not a tyrant-but this makes
the point) fear is can be found at www.frontpagemag.com
where one chilling quote brings this point home. "We
are certain that a Democrat administration will be more realistic," says a
senior advisor to Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak. "Bush's talk of imposing
democracy can only destabilise the region and produce catastrophe for all
concerned."
Think on this comment for a bit and see the crazy world view of this ruling
class. This world view FEARS democracy and calls democracy
"unrealistic". This is a warning to all who stay home on election day.
The John Kerrys and Ted Kennedys are welcomed by those who view democracy as
unrealistic. This somewhat echoes Bill Clinton's (and the democrats) reasoning
for not allowing tax cuts since he didn't think we could "spend it
right". This presidential election shows what direction Kerry will take
this nation and it also shows how much weaker this country will become as a
result of it. President Bush is a strong leader with the vision and
understanding of how precious liberty and democracy are and is the right man
between the two to make our world freer for "all
concerned".
Prescience by form enables us to a new light of continued self determination.
The point of religion is to free all to seek the afterlife garnered by the
heavy lifting of the here and now (hey, you can't do it all). Gospel is as
Gospel does... O.K., we see an anomalous disregard of the fleshly minded against
their call of personal indulgence. Oh, by the way, Patrick
Henry is THE MAN has the place of the prime directive against all political
ambition.
Whatever...Martha Stewart was convicted of ineffective deceit. Wool over the
eyes is poor decor on public opinion and the jury enviously concurred. Would
that Hill's cattle future money laundering was exposed as such and she sentenced
accordingly. Now, the self imposed have-nots, pull the plug on Martha-the
have and feel better about it all the way to the mirror. The Clinton's lie and
get away with it and Martha lies and goes to the slammer...no honor among thieves
we suppose. Time for jail house patina...
President Bush has responded to the criticism of Sen. Kerry and the rest of
the left by airing some campaign ads that simply show America isn't "out of
the woods" yet concerning the war on terrorism. Kerry and the left have had
free reign of the public's ear for some months now and the time has come for
Pres. Bush to voice his point of view as a candidate. This is how elections work
and have operated in the U.S. since the nation began. It is a sign that the thin
skinned left is less than candid with the American people by becoming
"drama Kings and Queens" when the inevitable and predictable occur in
the political process. What one may ask is President Bush to do? Say nothing?
Agree with Kerry? Quit? Don't kid yourself, the left is weak on this and
complains here to cover it up.
Isn't it great that against the hard background wall of 9/11/01, a protracted
bear market, high energy prices and corporate scandals, America has a low
unemployment rate of less than 10%, low interest rates and has seen recent GDP
growth higher than any time in the last 20 years!!!
Freedom for the whole man is predicated upon the favor of almighty God. If
our role as free moral agents is to reach the high ground of self determination
then we must condition ourselves as agents of compliance to selflessness and
vanguards of moral clarity. In the world today it is known that our time is
short and our power limited to our mortality. Vis a vis, the release of Mel
Gibson's movie on the passion of the Messiah brings humanity to the proper place
of humble awareness of the eternal workings of the eternal God. America is a
free nation because she is blessed by the God of freedom and the sacrifices of
our countrymen and the love they showed for liberty's sake while paying the ultimate
sacrifice. Jesus of Nazareth took away spiritual bondage and captivity of the
soul with his passion and resurrection and as such declared the true value of
liberty for all. This is a time for hard introspection and simple honesty as
"The Passion" moves past the superficial and into the heart of all who
are paying attention. Please take the time and experience this movie...challenge
your heart and soul to be conformed to the image of the longsuffering, beneficent,
empathizing and loving Creator. The pain of Jesus is hard to bear, yet, all he
did was from love. More than ever, man does not live by bread alone.
By increasing the funding for the NEA, President Bush is finding the nation
in need of culture and sophistication...right? Actually, this current overture
to his leftist political adversaries is appalling and illogical and one might
say criminal. Appalling, because without the government's money (ours), some of
these programs have no chance of commercial viability. Illogical, since the left
became the left without logic and therefore, can't be conservative and never
will be. Remember that the politically heated rhetoric about former
president Reagan was from the irrational left and therefore irreconcilably
removed from any fair critique of his governance. Criminal, because he is giving
aid and comfort to those who denounce and vilify the American life as they work
internally to subvert liberty's precious cause.
Our perspective on Iowa, democrats and the politically ambitious for the ui
readers. The way to deal with such blood lust greed is to feed it bad spoils.
This macabre fiesta comes with the weight of a paper bag; just paint it black.
The real import to this operation in futility is how many vain haters will push
for their anti-liberty siren foreheads. President Bush has some failings, to be
sure, however, he sees the world in purple and orange and will act to oppose fanaticism
both foreign and domestic. We should be glad that the election process makes the
elite ruling class flip pancakes in vain. They flip-flop on everything else so
this show of connecting with the average Joe is but a garish metaphor of
"where they are coming from" all the while demonstrating where they
are going.
Just a quick question...If Dan Quayle is Mr. Potato(e) head for
spelling potato as he did (it was how the teacher told him to spell it) then is
Howard Dean, Mr. Bible trivia for referencing the old testament book of
Job as part of the new testament in his "understanding" of the Bible?
Media bias at work...and that calls for the patience of Job for everyone!!!!
May all have a gracious and beneficial new year. At this time, as the page
turns on 2003, let us remind ourselves that our country always progresses-either
toward self-determination or tyranny. With that thought in mind, let us
thoughtfully consider our state mottos and see what we say about who we are as a
people. This link is here
for your ease in doing so and provides food for national thought about our
heritage. May we have the fair hand of God's providence to guide and keep us as
we head into the unknown of 2004.
Twenty-twenty on nine eleven-20-20-on 9/11...say it now, say it later, say it
when no one is around. The best way to find out what one could have done about a
circumstance is to have something happen related to it and THEN tell how things
would have been different as seen from the 20-20 vantage point. "This
is a very, very important part of history and we've got to tell it right,"
said Thomas Kean. Kean has it all straight and is in that twenty-twenty hind
sight seat giving all the "folly rest of us" the what for-for not
acting upon the unknown that went before (sorry, "The Cat in the Hat"
still is ringing in the ears). What did he know and when did he know it should
be asked of Clinton, et al and not of George W. If Kean can find cause and
effect here then he can find it with Al Gore when he said of the illegal
immigrants..."just get them in here"... so they can vote to keep our corrupt
life style in tact. Just watch what the virtuous nine and especially
"Sleeves-up Dean" does with this speculative report. Hey, someone tell
Howard Dean that George W will trade pre 9/11 intelligence documents for Deans
self-imposed, off limits, gubernatorial documents-not!!!
Saddam Hussein is the mother of all cowards. He never got to the point in his
life were his love of self was less for the love of anyone or anything else. He
worshipped at the alter of self pity and self aggrandizement. Now, he will
answer for his sins-they have found him out. Praise be to the coalition forces
in Iraq whom have found and captured this mother of all cowards and will now
bring him to justice. He will go they way of Hitler, Mussolini and others of the
dictator class when good roots them out. O happy day...
The subeminent Eminem who lives in the shadow of truth and shines like a fool
in the rainbow of false promises, brings the dross of " dead
president"; what a useful idiot of marginal renown-a rapper of inconsequential
historical renown. What we have here is a failure to elucidate- a freak of the
times and the afterbirth of liberty to lead to the promised land. He is broke
while rich and found wanting in liberty's ditch. Would that all who follow in
his blind way would live to see the grainy, no , perfect, no championed, no
healing, no, marginal, no, yes, LIMITED LIBERAL WAY to the way that got us
here-GOD, GUNS AND GUTS. Play it again Uncle Sam.
It is wacky and inconsistent for the big liberal media to critique and
excoriate George W Bush as a big spender and hold him accountable for breaking
the bank while at the same time allowing and encouraging the likes of the proffered
"poor people serious" Senators' Teddy Kennedy, Hilary Clinton, Mikulski,
Sarbanes, et, al to go free in their mad rush to buy votes with their usual
political largess paradigm. What is the big liberal media saying?... Bush is bad
because he spends money to take issues away from the libs and in doing so works
to solve problems and the libs are better because they spend to "show they
care" without ever having much to show for it? We at usefulidiots.com
are conservatives first and cynics second, yet this evolving hypocrisy
works wonders in revealing the perfect inconsistencies of the leftward press and
their ideologically aligned politicians who vaunt their relevance as the helpers
of the down trodden. The emperor has no clothes!!!
Fighting all appeasers, foreign and domestic is what free people are all
about, yet when it comes to electioneering, free is as free does. Exhibit
"A", the
"drug bill", oh what a chance to retool the generic political
consumption and the endemic characterization of "what comes next"
because of the symptomatic-we care modus operendi. To wit, the grand
children will be paying for our political harlotry-good luck.
Free drugs for a free people, it can't work. Be careful for what you wish for
because that is what you will get. The servant will become the master. Yet, the
master will get the vote.
What an honor it is to be lectured by Howard Dean on the criteria upon which
southerners should vote. Mr. Scheme and his "promised land vision" for
Amerikka has once again told the south how to think and vote. He hates competition
in the arena of lordship so if you don't mind, the south, according to his
admonition, should stop...basing their votes on "race,
guns, God and gays." Why is he so sure of this you may ask? Well,
because as a member of the self assured-savant like rulers on high, he is the
one who will GOVERN/RULE by...basing his presidency on "race, guns, God and
gays." Alas, a pampered, elitist, Manhattan schoolboy preppie "counseling
" the south on how to think and vote. Wonder if his sleeves were rolled up
when he spewed this wisdom out or were his hip waders rolled down to guard
against the bull@#%* that came out of his fork tongued mouth?
It is instructive and humorous to observe the democrats whom are running for
the office of president of the United States bite and devour each other.
Recently, Howard (Scheme) Dean was challenged to explain his remarks about his
"burning desire" to be the candidate for the confederate
flag adorned, pick up truck driving, denizens of the American south. Ah, diversity
lives. Problem is that he is just "TOO" diverse for those that pander
to the N.A.A.C.P. When push comes to shove for these presidential wanna-bee shills,
they must divide and pander while they attempt to divide and conquer.
With a superb 7.2% gdp quarterly growth rate in the U.S. economy for the
July/September time frame the left will have one less reason to vilify the GOP.
It is truth or dare time for the left since all their words regarding our
economy are going to show their ignorance and hyper-political usury at its
worst. Tax cuts work to raise the American basic standard of living and enhance
it's economic vitality. However, the left's words don't work to this end and conversely
FAIL to invigorate America's economic strength. It is one thing to be vain with
"some" redemption and it is another thing to be absolutely vain with
no clue and NO redemption.
Let's look at the cause and effect for the California wild fires...do you
think that the green party theology was the proximate cause as advocated by the
political harlots in the California legislature and state house? Emphatically
yes and here is why; if simple common sense purging and trimming of dead and
decayed timber was practiced, less wood could burn and less fuel for these
devastating fires would be available. Yet, what we are led to believe by the
enviro-nazis is that man is to blame for these fires because he simply exists.
Man is to blame for the fires it can be said truthfully--liberal man that is!!!
WOW! Peer pressure, the adolescent substrata that keeps the best from us, in
some instances, from coming out, has caused the 9th circuit court of California
to change direction and not obstruct the recall of Gov. Gray Davis. This is
cool! What do you think? That court could have put this whole thing on ice and
been the fly in the ointment but the national spotlight was too much for them
and scrutiny before Kool-Aid drinking makes this so. Go Arnold!
The California recall election was put on hold by the state's legalistic
ruling class. Since the alphabet of the ruling class is big "I" and
little
"U", all who dare to render self determination through the standing
law need parental-patrician intervention. Nothing like the anointed wisdom of
judicial anarchists to set the "sheeple-people" straight. Perhaps,
with the high profile this recall election gives, the little "U" serfs
can overcome the big "I" overlords throughout the golden state. There
is no liberty under the liberals, only control for their purposes and the loss
of individual and constitutionally guaranteed rights. None of us has a right to
do wrong!!!
On it's watch, the Clinton administration was a failure in its foreign
policy. What did they do when they had OBL on a silver platter? Well, they found
ways to let him slip away and ultimately bomb the world trade towers and by
doing so murder the victims of 9/11/01. They tried to get Israel to give its
soul away in exchange for "peace" when
Prime minister Ehud Barak was prepared to give away most of the West bank to
Arafat and others of that terrorist tribe. Arafat said no to this because he wants
all Jews dead and if he accepted such a huge negotiation win and still
complained, then the world community would look at him as THE problem in the
completion of the so called "peace process". Also, as any democrat
knows, if a problem is solved then their not so quiet thoughts are... "Just
what issues do we have to run on and thereby get and keep our political power
and fuddy duddy jobs?" Well this leads us into the obligatory C.Y.A. and
rewrite of history now manifest with the "official" kool-aide drinkers
of the wretched Clinton administration. In particular, Albright the
inept-the
secretary of state under Clinton, has brought denial and cheap shots to new lows
in a recent interview with TIME magazine. Here is a sample. Did you
neglect the threat posed by Osama bin Laden and leave it for the Bush
Administration to clean up?
President Clinton focused on terrorism from the start. The CIA set up a special
bin Laden division, and the President authorized the use of lethal force against
him. We struck his camp in 1998 after the embassy bombings, and we came close.
President Bush has been in Afghanistan with 8,000 troops, and they still haven't
found him. Yes, and we all can see the results of their world of words.
The Bush administration took Saddam out, exterminated his sons and is restoring
self-determination to a long terrorized people in Iraq.
The Clinton administration avoided the deeds of liberty while embracing the
words of liberty. Big deal, under Bush OBL is running for his ugly life and the
world knows that Bush will do what he says when the time is right. In the REAL
WORLD of DEEDS Osama Bin Laden is closer IN EVERY WAY to
capture and death than he EVER was under Clinton. She also says...in response to
the question, "What should the U.S. do next?
"Frankly, if there was a President Gore, we wouldn't be in this particular
mess". Oh yes that is true. No doubt about that. The reason why is because
Gore would fire some cruise missiles and claim to have "stayed calm"
in the face of terror. What the democrats fail to realize is that the bold and
outrageously confident acts of the terrorists are the end product of WEAK
FOREIGN POLICY under Clinton. They might be terrorists but they are calculating
terrorists. The failures of the Clinton administration were the precursors of
the successes of the 9/11 terrorists. Books have recently been published that
show this in great detail and more are on the way. In closing, it must be said
that Clinton was very good at bombing aspirin factories-that was symptomatic of
his "war" on terror. Who would the terrorists vote for?? More
importantly, when the next time comes, who will we vote for????
Some questions: What is the cost of liberty? What is the cost of tyranny?
What is the cost of subjugation? What is the cost of emancipation? What is the
cost of liberty? If all we do as a nation and all we value as a free people is rendered
down to a given dollar amount then all we stand for as positioned as a "free
people" is lost. It is poisonously ironic that the current president of the
U.S. (Bush) is critiqued as to the funding of the operation in Iraq by the
democratic presidential candidates. To wit; they NEVER worry or make political
hay about the "cost" of providing prescription drugs for the elderly.
Please look at what they told us Medicare would cost. It is outrageous! It
is a transparent political joke when they say we can't afford liberty (fighting
radical Islam) yet we can afford dependency on their "responsible and
appropriate" social programs. The relevant (non-political) question is how
much is the cost of doing nothing to preserve our liberty? What is the
cost of allowing our enemies the time and means of working terror, more and more
effectively against our way of life, absent any THOROUGH countermeasure?
Politicians by definition must make politics of any and all things. However, if
they fiddle while Rome burns, all that will be left is the way of Saddam, UBL
and the Taliban! One man's cost is another's investment. This is truly the case
of being "penny wise" while being "pound foolish"!
Democratic sausage maker Terry
(Global Crossing) McAuliffe accused the White House of trying to undercut
the Democrats' day of outreach with the announcement that Miguel Estrada was
withdrawing his name from consideration for the federal bench. Senate Democrats
had blocked his nomination and had shown no signs of relenting. Racist is as racist
does. Some, according to them are more equal and more useful for votes than
others.
An Alabama commission that monitors judicial conduct on Friday suspended the
chief justice of the state's Supreme Court (Roy Moore) over his defiance of a
U.S. order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state courthouse. This
was done because it was decided that his actions violated the first amendment of
the United States constitution. If one can read it is clear that he didn't
violate the constitution because as we read it states...Congress
shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of
the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances... To begin
with, note that he
is not a member of congress, and as such he can't make a law that says that all
Americans must worship God in a certain manner. This whole sorry episode is full
of bad logic, deliberate misapplication of legal straw men and a chance for the
theophobic to steal our rights for what should be free exercise of religion. In
addition, these haters can't even define the word religion to begin with.
History also proves them in error as these quotes demonstrate. And they tell us
a mind is a terrible thing to waste...
John Adams said, "We have no government armed with power capable of
contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our
Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly
inadequate for the government of any other. Oct. 11, 1798, Address to the
military
God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be
thought secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the
minds of men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be
violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect
that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.--Thomas Jefferson
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.
-William Penn
"The basis of our Bill of Rights comes from the teachings we get from
Exodus and St. Matthew, from Isaiah and St. Paul. I don't think we emphasize
that enough these days. If we don't have a proper fundamental moral background,
we will finally end up with a government which does not believe in rights for
anybody except the State!"
Harry S. Truman, Thirty-Third President
We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the
capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us
to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the
Ten Commandments of God. --James Madison, chief architect of the Constitution
I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the
people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and
sudden usurpations. --James Madison
Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and
vicious, they have more need of masters.--Benjamin Franklin
Let us not fall in line with the rest of history, whose fate was described by
Alexander Hamilton when he wrote..."But if experience, in this instance,
verifies the lesson long taught by the enemies of liberty, that the bulk of
mankind are not fit to govern themselves; that they must have a master, and were
only made for the rein and the spur; we shall see the final triumph of despotism
over liberty; the advocates of the latter must acknowledge it to be an ignis
fatuus, and abandon the pursuit. With the greatest advantages for promoting it
that a people ever had, we shall have betrayed the cause of human nature.---A
letter from Hamilton to the citizens of New York containing remarks on Mentor's
reply, 1784
As we wrote in the commentary below and in light of the Howard Dean political
situation, more Americans are able to suffer the fools of his ilk gladly. Yet,
as the bloom falls off of his rose he will be revealed as the hungry socialist he
is. We hope he wins the Democratic presidential nomination because he is the
McGovern of our time. Please take the time to reference his revealing interview
on "Meet the Press" where he said he didn't mean what he had
previously said about how he would balance the federal budget with huge tax
increases, radical reductions in defense spending and raising the eligibility
age for receiving social security benefits. These sort of ideas have put most of
Europe in the sad shape it is now in and the same awaits America if Dean has his
self serving way. The reason he rolls up his sleeves when he gives one of his speeches
is to show that he has no tricks up them because no tricks can change his tried
and failed political ideology.
Each year Americans celebrate Independence day with less knowledge of their
heritage as a free people and the effort and cost involved to provide and secure
that heritage of freedom. Please consider the ever growing dependence on
government and its panoply of "helping" programs and conversely, the
waning dependence upon self determination. One doesn't need to look very far in
today's news to see in what direction we are headed. The past is prologue and it
is as if government is run by Santa Clause. Let's look at some definitions to
really put a fine point on this Independence day and what it is supposed to
celebrate...
independence
\In`de*pend"ence\, n. [Cf. F. ind['e]pendance.] 1. The state or quality
of being independent; freedom from dependence; exemption from reliance on, or
control by, others; self-subsistence or maintenance; direction of one's own
affairs without interference.
de·pen·dence also de·pen·dancen.
The state of being dependent, as for support.
Subordination to someone or something needed or greatly
desired.
The state of being determined, influenced, or controlled by something
else.
Free or dependent? Why is the government trusted to absolutely deliver us from
all evil exept our evil trust in it? Think about this and keep ourselves free
because we have this waiting for us if we don't:
From bondage to spiritual faith. From faith to great courage. From courage to
liberty. From liberty to abundance. From abundance to complacency. From
complacency to selfishness. From selfishness to apathy. From apathy to
DEPENDENCY. From DEPENDENCY back again into bondage.
We will only be free if we value freedom. God bless you all this INDEPENDENCE
DAY!!
Taxes are going down because the Republicans know the best way to ensure
liberty and opportunity is to take this weight off our freedom. Remember, the
power to tax is the power to destroy. Can any of you name a Democrat that
sponsored legislation enabling the producer class to keep more of their sweat
equity from the hands of the greedy government ruling class? Ask yourself, who
brought about the individual retirement accounts? What about the 401(k)? Take a
look because they have no laws that enable the liberty of one to prosper and
keep it. Reject them and their ilk lest the "servant" becomes the
master.
Ok. We have been away and our e-mail has shown a need for our commentary among
the masses that visit this site, so here we go with some fresh material. First
of all thank you for the e-mail, both pro and con because it is engaged thought
we are after and boy has it ever been expressed! Remember Memorial Day. Is
this an oxymoron? It is not, because contextually considered, the relevance of this day of remembrance
can also be forgotten. It is our unbridled hope and prayer that the Liberty God has
granted us in America will by its very precious nature cause us to powerfully
and prayerfully ponder the value and human cost upon which it is based. America
isn't perfect but it is perfectly able. Please give financially to veterans
groups or volunteer if you can because of all they gave for us. It is wonderful
to show them they are not forgotten.
Politics is the art of selling ideas. Labels and bumper sticker slogans are
used by the left to mute debate and criticism from the right concerning the
left's agenda. Examples of this are found in legislation entitled "smart
growth" or "family friendly". If one were to oppose "smart
growth" then they naturally would be for "dumb growth" or if one
were to oppose "family friendly" legislation then they would be for
"family un-friendly" legislation. Do we therefore see how honest
debate looses out in such a process? Well, on the day that purports to celebrate
blue collar labor, May Day, it will come as no surprise that the phrase
"living wage" will be hyped by the left. All who oppose the idea, by
default, will be deemed as for an "unlivable wage" and therefore,
no
friend of the blue collar class. This is a total lie, but in politics, where the
salesman and not the idea being sold is what ends up mattering the most, the
right must learn to use the left's medicine against them. Here is how.
Let us learn from the left in this regard and formally declare May Day to be
the day the producer class cries out for a living tax cut. Since, conversely,
as per the left, all who oppose such a tax cut MUST be FOR an unlivable tax
rate. Those in the legislature who, as has been said, have the power to tax and
destroy, would be found greedy if they were against a living tax cut.
They have our money and we want it, for with it, we can have the standard of living we have
worked for. This process must be presented to the working class since this idea
sells itself. Family "friendly", in the conservative tradition, means not having to work
as long to pay one's taxes. A living tax cut is what all workers
need on this May Day and it is time the left is called into question on this
and as a result, their own logic can be used against them.
Did it ever occur to you how that the liberal press in America has a fixation
with all that is negative in the world? If life is not down enough for
them, they look to find the wrong and the disturbing in all of their world
and their lives so that any success is overshadowed by doubt and selfish
"glass half-full" indulgence? Boy, ain't we lucky to have them leading the pack
each day on the op-ed pages of the tried and found wanting, "pages of
record"!!!???
Let us look at the Baltimore Sun concerning the liberation of
Baghdad and just what is preeminently covered in that paper. Is it that the
people of Iraq are free from the chemical baths or the slow torture and death of
plastic shredders turned people shredders? No. They try to make the case that it
was safer under Saddam and life was more predictable under tyrannical oppression.
Can you believe this garbage? It is amazing and saddening to see the left give
place to Saddam and work to show President Bush as a problem child. Take a look
at this
link and then remember where in the media
freedom is valued.
How about actor Tim Robbins and his less than astute and flawed observation
that...'A chill wind is blowing through this nation... A message is being sent
through the White House and its allies in talk radio... 'If you oppose this
administration, there can and will be ramifications'... Remember that Bill
Clinton had and used the power of the I.R.S. against those that opposed both he
and Hillary's administration and Robbins never spoke out against that. Once,
during one of Clinton's dog and pony show "town hall" meetings, a man
asked Clinton to provide an example of any economy that was taxed into
prosperity. Well, slick Willie looked bad as he attempted to "answer
it" and the NEXT DAY the man who asked that question
was issued an audit notice by the feds. Remember that Paula Jones was audited as
well and she didn't even itemize. Now folks, that's what we call a "chill
wind" around here! Robbins and his ilk are on the wrong side of liberty and
they are confused about it and are lashing out at president Bush as a face
saving measure. It is a sign the liberals are about as empty as a cookie jar on
a fat farm for ideas.
Alexander Hamilton wrote in 1784 about what happened today in Iraq. It is to
be understood that he knew of mankind's natural preoccupation with
self-determination and liberty. He could not have known about the specific names
of people and their places of today, but he knew of the transcending
truth of liberty and tyranny and how the conflict between them never changes or
goes away.
... "The world has its eye upon America (Iraq). The noble struggle we
have made in the cause of liberty has occasioned a kind of revolution in human
sentiment. The influence of our example has penetrated the gloomy regions of
despotism, and has pointed the way to inquiries which may shake it to its
deepest foundations. Men begin to ask, everywhere: Who is this tyrant that
builds his greatness upon our misery and degradation? What commission has he to
sacrifice millions to the wanton appetites of himself and a few minions that
surround his throne?"... This current challenge to liberty was met in Iraq
by military means that toppled Saddam but to keep this liberty, the Iraqi people
must hold the lessons of his tyranny as a stern schoolmaster. Because, as
Hamilton also pointed out...
"But if experience, in this instance, verifies the lesson long taught by
the enemies of liberty, that the bulk of mankind are not fit to govern
themselves; that they must have a master, and were only made for the rein and
the spur; we shall see the final triumph of despotism over liberty; the
advocates of the latter must acknowledge it to be an ignis fatuus, and abandon
the pursuit. With the greatest advantages for promoting it that a people ever
had, we shall have betrayed the cause of human nature. May we learn from history
and not repeat it.
The phrase that the pen is mightier than the sword should serve as the
operatively sequential caveat for the coalition military under the headship of
the United States. As the pages are turned and the present turns into history,
the war to liberate Iraq and vis a vis the free world from Saddam's terroristic
effect, focus will naturally go
from the battlefield to the battleground of the written and spoken word. The
U.N., France, Russia, Germany and the liberal democrats in the United States
congress will look to sculpt this obvious military success in the Iraqi theatre
into a politically self-aggrandizing vehicle. Their disingenuous ethos of words meaning everything
will lift itself off the canvas of irrelevancy and morph into and present itself
as "we knew it all along" that Saddam's regime would fall quickly. Yes, they are liars to such
a degree. Forewarned is forearmed because what comes next in Iraq is not so much
as what is as
what it seems to be.
Even though the words of the left are demonstrably vain and void by virtue of
this wonderful military campaign, the left knows and is counting on that when the bombs stop memories
will grow short. This time, however, with the aid of a truly " free
press", we perceive that the pen will align itself with the sword and
render a specific harmonious virtue and victory for freedom lovers
everywhere.
Free speech or free-for-all? Please establish the difference between
obstruction of civil life and uncivil behavior in the name of civility. If such
protests override my liberty so as to take it away, how does one through these
protestations, set society free in the name of freedom? The state of Oregon
(of all places) has a law that renders a proper litigious recompensing sentence
to the "war protesters" for their masquerading, anti-war,
anti-American anarchy. Remember, my liberty ends where your nose begins!
The liberal press has once again painted themselves into an ideological
corner. When they say that the coalition forces are going to whip the Arab
street into a frenzy as they move against Saddam, they prejudicially label the
Arabs as possessing an anger and rage special and peculiar to them. It makes one
think of what bigots of bygone years said about the Irish and the Indians not
being able to handle their alcohol and such like. What an ironic circumstance
that the supposed vanguard of all that is good and pure among the divergent
components of the American populace-the liberal media-should fall prey to their
own predispositions. Their minds are closed, yet their mouths are open so wide
that they must put their collective foot inside. This is bad enough even without
the thoroughly discredited Peter Arnett being mentioned. If this was a episode
on the battlefield then damage assessment would show gaping holes in credibility
and a change in THEIR battle plans-because plan A-to discredit all the success
of the coalition has failed and all they have in its stead is to label good as
bad and hope no one notices. On the REAL battle field this is the end of the beginning
but in liberal media land this is the beginning of the end.
What about us? We have all the wheels of life turning our way in our world of
hot water showers and instant replay. We are well equipped to see the end from
the beginning as we parse out conclusions in this war of fate and perfect
liberty! Who is to blame for the myopia that passes for analysis? What about the
protesters of this war; the afterbirth of liberty's pledge? Step by step and
thought by thought, our hope of freedom rests on the shoulders of the benighted
few who keep our peace: may God give them grace and all of liberty's
clan-victory! Consider the captives of this war who grace the eternal page of
life as liberty's children, wrongfully imprisoned behind enemy lines. Pray for
them as counseled by Psalm 35 1 Plead my cause, O LORD, with them that strive with
me: fight against them that fight against me. 2 Take hold of shield and buckler, and stand up for
mine help. 3 Draw out also the spear, and stop the way against
them that persecute me: say unto my soul, I am thy salvation. 4 Let them be confounded and put to shame that seek
after my soul: let them be turned back and brought to confusion that devise my
hurt. 5 Let them be as chaff before the wind: and let the
angel of the LORD chase them. 6 Let their way be dark and slippery: and let the
angel of the LORD persecute them. 7 For without cause have they hid for me their net
in a pit, which without cause they have digged for my soul. 8 Let destruction come upon him at unawares; and let
his net that he hath hid catch himself: into that very destruction let him fall. 9 And my soul shall be joyful in the LORD: it shall
rejoice in his salvation. 10 All my bones shall say, LORD, who is like unto
thee, which deliverest the poor from him that is too strong for him, yea, the
poor and the needy from him that spoileth him? 11 False witnesses did rise up; they laid to my
charge things that I knew not. 12 They rewarded me evil for good to the spoiling of
my soul. 13 But as for me, when they were sick, my clothing
was sackcloth: I humbled my soul with fasting; and my prayer returned into mine
own bosom. 14 I behaved myself as though he had been my friend
or brother: I bowed down heavily, as one that mourneth for his mother. 15 But in mine adversity they rejoiced, and gathered
themselves together: yea, the abjects gathered themselves together against me,
and I knew it not; they did tear me, and ceased not: 16 With hypocritical mockers in feasts, they gnashed
upon me with their teeth. 17 Lord, how long wilt thou look on? rescue my soul
from their destructions, my darling from the lions. 18 I will give thee thanks in the great
congregation: I will praise thee among much people. 19 Let not them that are mine enemies wrongfully
rejoice over me: neither let them wink with the eye that hate me without a
cause. 20 For they speak not peace: but they devise
deceitful matters against them that are quiet in the land. 21 Yea, they opened their mouth wide against me, and
said, Aha, aha, our eye hath seen it. 22 This thou hast seen, O LORD: keep not silence: O
Lord, be not far from me. 23 Stir up thyself, and awake to my judgment, even
unto my cause, my God and my Lord. 24 Judge me, O LORD my God, according to thy
righteousness; and let them not rejoice over me. 25 Let them not say in their hearts, Ah, so would we
have it: let them not say, We have swallowed him up. 26 Let them be ashamed and brought to confusion
together that rejoice at mine hurt: let them be clothed with shame and dishonour
that magnify themselves against me. 27 Let them shout for joy, and be glad, that favour
my righteous cause: yea, let them say continually, Let the LORD be magnified,
which hath pleasure in the prosperity of his servant. 28 And my tongue shall speak of thy righteousness
and of thy praise all the day long.
It is time to examine the fruits of Christianity vs. the fruits of radical Islam. The
Lord said that by their fruits you will know them and the fruits of Islam are to
torture, maim, castrate and shoot in the head the coalition prisoners of war. Conversely,
the fruits of America (a Christian nation by nature) provide food, clothing,
shelter, medical care and even copies of the Koran and time and place to pray
for the Iraqi prisoners of war. The Christian faith teaches that we are to do
unto others as we would have done to ourselves. This teaching extends even to
the point of eliminating evil even insofar as destroying such would make all
mankind free from evil-even if we were found to be evil ourselves. American is
not evil as proven by her fruits of perfect empathy and the destruction of Iraqi
evil is doing unto others as we would have done unto us-since evil is
intolerable wherever it is found. We submit this contrast before a candid world.
Remember and tremble at the murdered P.O.W.s love for LIBERTY because they
did it for us...
John 15 13 Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life
for his friends.
Words fail to describe the purposeful benefit of the coalition forces as lead
by the United States. They are in salvation mode for the Iraqi people in
particular and the world in general. Without this, the ilk of Saddam would have
their way, without this, the peace protesters would have their "perfect
world" of dictatorial control. With this, the metastasizing evil of Saddam
would call the shots and his way would be forcefully obeyed or at least torture
would ensue or at worst, death would come by his "tolerant" regime for
all dissenters, real or imagined. It must be stated that life was meant for the
better things of liberty as proscribed by the American way of life. Of course,
the anti-type of liberty is tyranny and oppression and that makes us want to
protest FOR liberty. It's one, two, three, four what are we fighting for...? Our
fight is for liberty, it is for emancipation and not subjugation. The fight we
are engaged in is for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as promised by
natures God. It is tragic that something so simple can be propagandized into the
protesters complicated shadows. After all, they protest against the political
system that allows them to protest. Logic is the first casualty of war.
Tom Daschle please become a human shield.
What is the difference between the words of the socialists,
communists and tyrants and the reality of the liberty based deeds and prosperity
of the free world's greatest hope-America? The difference is found in the
reality of good promised and good delivered. Americans live the fruits of
liberty while the words of the collectivists never deliver and never make good
on what they promised. Their words are as empty as the in fecund United Nations.
John Quincy Adams said, “This hand, to tyrants ever sworn
the foe,
For Freedom only deals the deadly blow;
Then sheathes in calm repose the vengeful blade,
For gentle peace in Freedom’s hallowed shade.”
This quote defines peace as a result of victory over
oppression and tyranny. Therefore, it must be posed…
Is peace found in the virtual reality of a staged protest?
Is peace truly achieved through protesting against war?
Is peace an abstract of the fruitful imagination that is
cast in blind ignorance?
Is peace a condition of words or an expression of negligent
suicide?
Is peace the same for the tyrant and the liberator from
tyranny?
Please follow logic as the war unfolds to see through the
specious arguments of the “anti-war” protesters. They protest against the
American system and it’s military which protects them while they do so and as
a result conversely enable tyrants to grow bold. In the world of these tyrants
the protestors are nothing more than useful idiots.
Let us be grateful for the free world's capability to remove Saddam from
power. The old liberal chant that one cannot simultaneously prepare for war and
peace is blown away by the goal of removing Saddam. It must be said that without
war there would be no peace. Thank God that the peace that comes through war is
the peace that come from the removal of the wicked, warped and grotesque
Saddam Hussein.
The liberal media establishment asks if one is anti-war are they also
anti-American? The answer is yes, if the war we are fighting in results in the
defeat of those who seek to remove the liberties that make America free.
It is roughly analogous to saying we are against house fires and yet protest the
firefighters who are trying to extinguish them. It is similar to saying we are
against hunger but we are also against farming. The group that these protester should
form is Americans in support of Saddam--A.S.S. for short.
The topic of hate crimes was all the politically useful rage several years
back. Yet when the terrorists flew those planes into the world trade towers, the
Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania, no one made the connection or protested that these
murderous acts were the mother of all hate crimes. Where are the protesters on
this issue and where are the Bozo political hacks and the divide and conquer
Democratic party "leaders" who sang the song of hate crimes all the
way to the bank? This should tell you what they REALLY think of "hate
crimes".
